Google's self-driven cars far from ready, still face many technological hurdles

Himanshu Arora

Posts: 902   +7
Staff

Back in April this year, Google announced that its cars had driven 700,000 autonomous and accident-free miles. While these cars could probably perform well in an ideal driving environment, the reality is that they have yet to prove they can handle some common real-world driving scenarios.

According to Chris Urmson, director of the Google car team, the car hasn't yet been tested in bad weather conditions like heavy rain and snow, nor has it tackled big, open parking lots or multilevel garages.

While the driverless vehicle can detect and respond to stop signs that aren’t on its map, it wouldn’t know to obey a traffic stoplight that appeared overnight. Also, in case of an unmapped four-way stop, the car might fall back to slow, extra cautious driving to avoid making a mistake.

Among other unsolved problems, the car can’t differentiate between road obstacles like a rock and a crumpled piece of paper, and will try to drive around them. Also, it currently detects pedestrians as moving, column-shaped blurs of pixels, which means that it is impossible for the vehicle to spot a police officer managing traffic.

The car's video camera, which detects the color of a traffic light, gets blinded when the sun is directly behind a light, plus the vehicle also can’t detect potholes or spot an uncovered manhole if it isn’t coned off.

Urmson says these and other issues remain unsolved because engineers haven’t yet gotten to them, but he expects solutions are “going to happen more quickly than many people think”.

Permalink to story.

 
For the Traffix lights wouldnt be connected to the Traffic office service along with GPS coordinates, be more hellpfull for the car to know exactly what color is the light?
 
Wow this software is like pre-pre-alpha. It can just drive. It doesn't have any brains yet though! They still have ways to go not just in the driving mechanics but also encryption. The car needs to be protected against hacking.
 
If it can't detect the difference between law enforcement and the general public then at least it should be quick and powerful enough to make a clean getaway, have the ability to change numberplates on the fly, dispense oil onto the road and be bulletproof just like 007's rides.:)
 
I dont trust algorithms to work 100% of the time, especially when it comes to large several hundred pound boxes of metal with people inside trying not to collide.
 
This isn't discouraging news to me. I always felt we're at least a decade off, barring a huge leap in AI tech. The research should be done now.
 
I dont trust algorithms to work 100% of the time, especially when it comes to large several hundred pound boxes of metal with people inside trying not to collide.
It does not have to work 100%, just better than humans, which is not that difficult.
 
I got a Déjà vu feeling while reading this article, and suddenly realised why. Here it is -

At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25.00 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."

In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating: If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:

1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.

3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue.

For some reason you would simply accept this.

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.

5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive - but would run on only five percent of the roads.

6. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "This Car Has Performed An Illegal Operation" warning light.

7. The airbag system would ask "Are you sure?" before deploying.

8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.

9. Every time a new car was introduced car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

10. You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off."

Needless to say, I won't be buying a self driving car!
 
Tech is not there yet, in time it will be. Right now they can only do what resources they have today. What they should work on is Time Travel device go 100 years into the future grab the tech (if they're still using this idea of Self-driving cars) and bring it back to 2014 so they can implement and solve the critical issues of this time! LOL

But for now this vehicle is a work-in-progress and did Google get a project tax grant from US Government to work on this project. So at the end of the year or during the next income tax they can put it down as tax deduction (aka write off) off their company taxes.
 
Back