Hidden underground hydrogen reserves could power the entire Earth for centuries

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 582   +13
Staff
Futurology A new study has unveiled a discovery beneath the Earth's surface: a vast reservoir of hydrogen that could potentially reshape the global energy landscape. Scientists estimate that approximately 6.2 trillion tons of hydrogen lie hidden in rocks and underground reservoirs, a quantity that dwarfs known oil reserves by a factor of 261.

The research, led by Geoffrey Ellis, a petroleum geochemist at the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), has been published in the journal Science Advances. It suggests that tapping into just a fraction of this hydrogen could have far-reaching implications for the world's energy future.

"Just 2% of the hydrogen stocks found in the study, equivalent to 124 billion tons of gas, would supply all the hydrogen we need to get to net-zero [carbon] for a couple hundred years," Ellis told LiveScience. This amount of hydrogen contains roughly twice the energy stored in all known natural gas reserves on Earth.

Hydrogen, a clean energy carrier, has diverse applications, ranging from fueling vehicles to powering industrial processes and generating electricity. As global efforts to combat climate change intensify, hydrogen is projected to play an increasingly significant role, potentially accounting for up to 30% of future energy supply in some sectors.

The study's findings challenge long-held beliefs about hydrogen's behavior underground. "The paradigm throughout my entire career was that hydrogen's out there, it occurs, but it's a very small molecule, so it easily escapes through small pores and cracks and rocks," Ellis said. However, recent discoveries of substantial hydrogen caches in West Africa and an Albanian chromium mine have shifted this perspective.

To estimate the global hydrogen reserves, Ellis and his colleague Sarah Gelman developed a model accounting for various factors, including hydrogen production rates underground, the amount likely trapped in reservoirs, and losses through processes such as atmospheric leakage. The model revealed a wide range of possible hydrogen quantities, from 1 billion to 10 trillion tons, with 6.2 trillion tons being the most probable estimate.

While these figures are promising, Ellis cautions that much of this hydrogen may be inaccessible due to depth or offshore locations. Additionally, some reserves might be too small for economically viable extraction. Nevertheless, the sheer scale of the estimated reserves suggests that even with these limitations, there could be ample hydrogen available for exploitation.

One of the key advantages of natural hydrogen over synthetically produced "green" or "blue" hydrogen is its ready availability. "We don't have to worry about storage, which is something that with the blue hydrogen or green hydrogen you do," Ellis said. "You want to make it when electricity is cheap and then you have to store it somewhere. With natural hydrogen, you could just open a valve and close it whenever you needed it."

However, the exact locations of these hydrogen reserves remain unknown, presenting the next challenge for researchers. Ellis and his team are working on narrowing down the geological criteria necessary for underground hydrogen accumulation, with results for the U.S. expected early next year.

While the potential of this discovery is enormous, some experts urge caution. Professor Bill McGuire from University College London told the BBC that extracting hydrogen on a scale large enough to impact emissions significantly would require "an enormous global initiative for which we simply don't have time." He also emphasized the need for extensive supporting infrastructure. McGuire questioned whether exploiting another finite resource is necessary, given the availability of renewable energy sources like wind and solar.

Permalink to story:

 
McGuire questioned whether exploiting another finite resource is necessary, given the availability of renewable energy sources like wind and solar.

Ah yes because solar and wind are always available. Oh and solar panels and wind turbines last forever as well.
Not like they last only 25 years and we make them out of non recyclable materials that we just dump on a trash heap after.
**End of sarcasm**

Solar panels do get some precious metals extracted using heavy chemicals.

And all those lithium batteries required for cars aren't exactly great for the environment. Hydrogen would make for a clean alternative for vehicle use if it can be extracted with minimal impact on the environment and it would last us long enough to carry us over to an energy source with fewer negatives than what's available now. Hell, fusion might finally be viable in another few centuries
 
That solar fusion reactor in the sky will continue to provide us with FREE ENERGY and heat for the next 4 Billion years.

We could be using solar energy to help produce hydrogen through electrolysis with regular sea water.

The move to electric vehicles makes the most sense. We can continue to install solar in as many places as possible to help the electric grid and provide shade/shelter. Then add charging stations - level 2 and level 3 where appropriate. Continue to push for nuclear power and alternative energy.

Electrical furnaces and electrical appliances.

But none of that changes the fact that when you have less expensive energy, it drives human population growth and its possible some people don't want that.

 
I think everything is on the table.

A lot of it is driven by commodity and utility prices

Coal is generally being phased out if not high quality easy extraction and ease to markets

We have see cylindrical effects for prices at the petrol/gas/benzene tanks

Plus prices like Oil get market shifted by OPEC up or down , extracted left in ground to suit solely their purposes , unless the Good old US of A puts pressure on to fit their agenda

Given quicker R&D techniques , more production techniques , more material science. ie the curious fact you can stuff more hydrogen gas into something than nothing - eg that something being some kind of porous nano material.

Until we have portable fusion batteries or high density batteries with the right ticks. Hydrogen does seem a viable option for long haul trucks going forward

As for Oil Saudi Arabia is still floating on it, I'm sure edge deep sea, fracking ( and other active extraction methods ) will get phased out in coming decades

Gas Russia. Ukraine and else where have plenty for a long while yet
 
As with all other avenues for commercial scale energy production, the pursuit will be governed by the finances. If the margins aren't viable, too expensive to access, etc. no buyers. Solar thrives recently because it's become inexpensive. Demand is strong for storage, build it in whatever fashion possible.
 
That solar fusion reactor in the sky will continue to provide us with FREE ENERGY and heat for the next 4 Billion years.

We could be using solar energy to help produce hydrogen through electrolysis with regular sea water.

The move to electric vehicles makes the most sense. We can continue to install solar in as many places as possible to help the electric grid and provide shade/shelter. Then add charging stations - level 2 and level 3 where appropriate. Continue to push for nuclear power and alternative energy.

Electrical furnaces and electrical appliances.

But none of that changes the fact that when you have less expensive energy, it drives human population growth and its possible some people don't want that.
Free LOL
 
There is already long lasting clean energy source but still many didnt tap due to regulation and potential menace of WW3 in form of nuclear energy... Also this come right after news of cheap Battery from chinese ready to export ... seems coincidence to affect something in this world
 
This discovery is truly amazing! Finding such a vast amount of hydrogen beneath the Earth's surface could revolutionize the energy industry. Not only would it help reduce reliance on fossil fuels, but it also provides a pathway to achieving global carbon reduction goals. Especially considering that this natural hydrogen can be easily accessible without the need for storage concerns. With this great potential, it truly brings hope for a cleaner and more sustainable energy future.
 
So-called white or gold hydrogen has been known for a few years now but estimated reserves were thought to be quite Limited.
Deep Drilling is a well-established process for oil and gas extraction so adapting to hydrogen should not be too difficult. An expert saying that we don't have time is quite wrong; we cannot afford any delay.
 
Scientists estimate that approximately 6.2 trillion tons of hydrogen lie hidden in rocks and underground reservoirs, a quantity that dwarfs known oil reserves by a factor of 261.
It's incredibly disingenuous to compare a wild estimate (of hydrogen) to known proven reserves of oil and gas. Since 1965, we've discovered more than 5 new barrels of oil for every 3 we've consumed, a process that's likely to continue further.

It's even more absurd when one considers this hydrogen estimate comes largely from the assumption of abiotic production processes deep within the earth. If those do indeed exist, then those same processes will also produce abiotic oil and gas (an assumption Soviet scientists first proposed in the 1950s) meaning the earth's stocks of fossil fuels are hundreds of times larger than current estimates.

But by far the largest problem here isn't the estimate size, but the sheer inability to economically collect 99.9% of the hydrogen anyway. Your average square meter of topsoil in your own backyard contains many valuable elements: iron, nickel, aluminum, rare earths ... even gold, palladium, and uranium. But a few stray molecules here and there aren't anywhere near enough to make collection viable.
 
The environmentals will find a reason that it should not be used

Wrong people, the coal luddites will. those earth and baby killers will find any reason to have lobbyists kill any thing that is as good as hydrogen so they can kill more people undergrounds, kill babies with fracking contamination and rape the planet to underage cheerleader porn like matt geatz
 
.... those earth and baby killers will find any reason to have lobbyists kill any thing that is as good as hydrogen so they can kill more people undergrounds, kill babies with fracking contamination...
LOL, a particularly ironic accusation, given that these underground hydrogen reservoirs can be reached only by fracking the surrounding rock.
 
The use of any fuel depletes the oxygen content of the atmosphere, with one exception: hydrogen produced from water.
 
"supply all the hydrogen we need to get to net-zero [carbon]"

How will we extract energy from hydrogen? Burn it, perhaps, in an engine to convert it to power? Where, then do those waste products go? How much wil this cost? If it's not more cost effective, then what will we gain?
 
The use of any fuel depletes the oxygen content of the atmosphere, with one exception: hydrogen produced from water.

A) The hydrogen in this article isn't produced from water. Since it already exists: 2H2 + O2→ 2H2O.
B) If we produce hydrogen from water, it's no longer an energy source, but just a carrier. And a rather inefficient carrier, as electrolysis alone is only about 60%, plus what you lose when you burn the H2 itself.
C) The burning of any fuel -- be it oil, natural gas, or hydrogen -- is done in quantites many millions of times too small to effectively change the O2 content of the atmosphere.
 
Last edited:
Wrong people, the coal luddites will. those earth and baby killers will find any reason to have lobbyists kill any thing that is as good as hydrogen so they can kill more people undergrounds, kill babies with fracking contamination and rape the planet to underage cheerleader porn like matt geatz
Wow. You have a bleak attitude towards man. Cheer Up, find a worthy purpose and your whole life will change for the better. Good Luck, I'm praying for you
 
Man, can you climate change deniers contact the Texas Railroad Commission and get them to remove all the monetary hoops I have to pay my way through so I can start flaring gasses off schedule without penalty? That would really save my company tons of money. Chop chop?
 
Before you go discounting batteries for cars.
Before you discount windmills and solar panels and say look these are bad for the environment too etc. etc. etc.

Be sure you really understand just how bad oil extraction, refining, storage, piping, and burning/using is for environment.

People do not get cancer from lithium or lithium processing but they do from oil refining.
People do not get asthma from batteries, but they from breathing diesel exhaust.
Downwind areas or "fallout zones" around refining plants and coal fired power plants are well known for a host of medical issues not seen further away.

And in the end, lithium mining is typically just refining salt water. Its not dangerous at all.
Nickle, chromium, cobalt etc. are definitely bad but still not as bad as coal or oil.

Coal and oil are the WORST even if climate change is not a thing and using them has no effect on the climate.
 
No matter what the unobtanium is that would provide us with energy there will always be that group of people we all know who will use it as a political football by demonizing it, guilting us through a massive web of internets and media , and taxing the sh#t out of it so they can keep on thriving and feeling good about themselves since they don't believe in anything but their egos.
 
People do not get cancer from lithium mining ... lithium mining is typically just refining salt water. Its not dangerous at all.
Nickle, chromium, cobalt etc. are definitely bad but still not as bad as coal or oil.
Oops! This fallacy is based on the fact that, while we've been studying the dangers of hydrocarbons for centuries, lithium mining is new and little researched. But not wholly unstudied:

Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology:

"...The results of this review suggest that occupational and environmental exposure to mining metals used in [lithium ion batteries] presents significant risks to human health that result in both acute and chronic toxicities....Lithium mining has been shown to increase the concentration of other heavy metals, such as arsenic, in surrounding surface water....."


Journal of Environmental Pollution:

"... soil contamination with Li can reach the food chain due to its mobility in surface- and ground-waters and uptake into plants. High environmental Li levels adversely affect the health of humans, animals, and plants....."
NYTimes:
"...the [proposed Nevada mine], known as Lithium Americas, has drawn protests from Native American tribes, ranchers and environmental groups because it is expected to use billions of gallons of precious ground water, potentially contaminating some of it for 300 years, while leaving behind a giant mound of waste....Production of raw materials like lithium, cobalt and nickel that are essential to these technologies are often ruinous to land, water, wildlife and people....":
 
Man, can you climate change deniers contact the Texas Railroad Commission..
Sure -- just as soon as you stop using all electricity and fuels derived from oil and gas, along with all subsidiary plastics, pharmaceuticals, and other products made from hydrocarbon mining.

Get right on that, will you?
 
Back