HP forced customers to wait 15 minutes for tech support - on purpose - backpedaled after backlash

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 1,707   +499
Staff
Facepalm: In what might be one of the biggest gaffs of the year, HP is trying to dislodge its foot from its mouth after getting caught intentionally forcing customers to wait for 15 minutes on technical support calls. Even HP's customer service staff criticized the bafflingly dumb move.

The Register reports that HP intentionally forced customers to wait 15 minutes when trying to reach tech support. The "minimum" wait time idea mentioned in an internal memo that The Register obtained was floated as a way to push users to go online and look for "self-support" as the company tried to "improve" its overall customer service experience.

The change would have impacted retail customers calling from the UK, Ireland, France, Germany, and Italy. The memo from HP management informed customer care staff that, effective February 18, people using the "Interactive Voice Response" (IVR) system would need to wait at least 15 minutes before reaching support.

The company aimed to "influence" customers to use its digital support services, which is essentially just a Google site search. The IVR system would play a message about non-existent "high call volumes," asking users to check the official HP support or VirtualAgent Cloud websites for a quicker response to technical issues.

The IVR system only mentioned the 15-minute wait time at the beginning of the call. The rest of the automated recording would play three times during the call so that customers wanting to speak to a human would be too annoyed to complete the call. The company said it was taking "decisive short-term action to generate warranty cost efficiencies."

Technology companies seeking quarterly profits above everything else have never been particularly good with customer support. Even HP staffers weren't happy with the bizarre decision because clueless managers don't have to deal with customers looking for human help with their malfunctioning devices.

Ultimately, HP backpedaled after "initial feedback" on the ill-conceived notion and abandoned the policy. However, it still tried to spin the story in its favor to save face, saying it was only trying to make customers aware of its digital support options.

"We have found that many of our customers were not aware of the digital support options we provide. Based on initial feedback, we know the importance of speaking to live customer service agents in a timely fashion is paramount. As a result, we will continue to prioritize timely access to live phone support to ensure we are delivering an exceptional customer experience."

Nice try.

Permalink to story:

 
HP started to rot about 20 years ago and has been in a steady decline ever since.
Companies seem to compete now to provide the worst service. I think if an organisations made customer service a key part of their offering and were very clear about this they could do very well in an age of bots and overseas call centres.
 
HP is a terrible anti consumer company and has been for decades. They invented the whole locking half full ink cartridges and expiry date nonsense as if printer ink is a carton of milk. Not surprised they have a great many other dumb policies to annoy customers.
 
If people are too stupid to figure it out or find online, they need to talk to a human to get what they need. What if they do not though? They might not pick HP again.
Is that what HP really wants? It would be stupid to think so.
 
When I was working in the 90's and even into the early Aught's, HP was right up there neck and neck with Canon in printers and Dell in PCs. They were everywhere in my firm and in our clients' firms. Now here in the mid 20's, I NEVER see their equipment in offices. What a huge fall in mindshare. And they have nobody but themselves to blame for it.
 
Back