JetZero aims to make commercial jets flatter (and more futuristic) by 2030

zohaibahd

Posts: 937   +19
Staff
Forward-looking: While commercial aviation has made incredible strides in safety and efficiency over the decades, passenger jets have stubbornly adhered to the same fundamental tube-and-wing configuration for nearly a century. While this architecture has proven reliable, it is reaching the limits of its potential. With aviation contributing approximately 2.5% of global carbon emissions, many startups are now exploring radical alternatives.

One such company is JetZero, which, in partnership with engineering giants Siemens and Northrop Grumman, is developing a revolutionary passenger jet design that seamlessly blends the wings into the fuselage.

This concept, known as the "blended wing body," isn't entirely new. It was first proposed over a century ago by Russian aviator Nicolas Woevodsky. However, it has largely remained theoretical, appearing only in a handful of military drone designs.

Once conventional tube-and-wing airliners became the standard, the industry resisted change due to the challenges of certifying a new aircraft shape for passenger use. But JetZero believes the potential benefits of the blended wing body design are too compelling to ignore.

The biggest perk of a blended wing body is its wider, shorter fuselage, which transitions smoothly into the wings to create a single lifting surface. The startup says this reduces aerodynamic drag by up to 30% compared to a traditional tube fuselage. When combined with lighter weight and improved engine integration, JetZero claims their design could slash fuel consumption by 50% compared to today's jets. That's massive.

The blended shape also allows for more interior space. JetZero's concept seats 250 passengers while maintaining a smaller overall footprint than existing single-aisle planes like the Boeing 737, which holds 215. Noise levels are expected to be significantly lower as well.

Perhaps most importantly, JetZero's design is fully compatible with sustainable aviation fuels and has the potential to run on hydrogen, achieving zero emissions as that technology matures.

JetZero plans to conduct its first test flight by 2027 and aims to enter commercial service by 2030. However, the company acknowledges that this is an ambitious timeline for bringing such an unconventional design to market. Notably, JetZero has yet to establish a manufacturing facility for the aircraft.

This is where Siemens comes into play. Announced at CES 2025, the partnership with Siemens will leverage the company's automation hardware, software, and services to create a "Factory of the Future," where the aircraft will be designed, tested, and iterated upon before final production.

In parallel, JetZero is collaborating with Northrop Grumman and the U.S. Air Force to develop a subscale prototype called "Pathfinder." This 23-foot test aircraft has already validated key aerodynamic principles and begun real-world flight control testing. Data from Pathfinder will inform the development of the full-scale aircraft, which will be eight times larger.

Permalink to story:

 
For those interested in a more global look at the general idea of this type of aircraft (not this one specifically). I've seen this video on it a while back which is quite interesting:

Sounds like Jetzero is polishing up the numbers a bit more to attract more investors. This concept isn't new and they're not the only ones working on it. At least Boeing and their dubious construction quality isn't involved.
 
Yeah, because those flat wing concepts are some 30 years old now, and because Boeing is so cheap that They refuse to let go 737 design for 60 years now, that It gets them in trouble in the last decade.

Good luck.
Should have added "supersonic" to this clickbait - would have add more value to the shares of mentioned companies.
 
Looking at the pic, it is very possible there is a space for 2 planes in this thing.
It means, the airline can put twice as many sits in it and get twice as much money.
I
 
Looks cool but you didn't define what "potential" is for the "tube and wing" design. I like reliable personally.

I don't believe this statement "resisted change due to the challenges of certifying a new aircraft shape for passenger use." I think, why change what works so well? This can be seen in the longevity of the B-52.

"Perhaps most importantly, JetZero's design is fully compatible with sustainable aviation fuels and has the potential to run on hydrogen, achieving zero emissions as that technology matures."

No not most importantly at all. This may work and I hope it does because planes are cool. Most importantly is getting more stories out there about carbon which absolutely NO ONE cares about. Even those that say and write that they do. And what are sustainable fuels that can power this thing. They don't exist
 
They've been talking about Blended wing bodies forever.

Thing is: evacuation standards and fuel placement issues are probably not gonna let it happen anytime soon.

For the foreseeable future, the Airbus A350 is the future of air travel. Large, widebody twin jets capable of 9000 mile range. NYC to Singapore nonstop.

I've already flown business class with Philippine Air for 16 hours nonstop (the longest flights I take) on their A350 and it's a pretty good experience.
 
Remember the last South Korean air disaster? Imagine that with a plane filled with hydrogen...
 
Remember the last South Korean air disaster? Imagine that with a plane filled with hydrogen...
This is a common misconception. People think a hydrogen fuel tank will explode like some kind of giant bomb. Hydrogen alone cannot burn without a mix of oxygen.

"Hydrogen can be explosive with oxygen concentrations between 18 and 59 percent while gasoline can be explosive at oxygen concentrations between 1 and 3 percent. This means that gasoline has greater risk for explosion than hydrogen for any given environment with oxygen."

Those planes fly at a pretty high altitude where there's less oxygen, coupled with the fact that hydrogen is much lighter than air, it dissipates rapidly when it is released.
 
Lifting body craft always look the coolest to me. They also have immense cargo capacity.

I'm not an aerospace engineer, but I've built and flown countless fake airplanes on my PC.
 
My bet is that wind tunnel tests between traditional designs and blended body designs show a reduction in turbulence at the wing/body interface, and this is at least part of the reason blended body designs are more efficient.
 
Back