Bombardier's Global 8000 aims to be the fastest civilian jet since the Concorde

zohaibahd

Posts: 978   +19
Staff
Forward-looking: It's a bummer that, more than two decades later, commercial flights still can't touch the Concorde's blistering speeds. Today's airliners cruise between Mach 0.74 and 0.85 – the sweet spot for fuel efficiency. But that's a far cry from the Concorde's incredible top speed of Mach 2.04. Will we ever experience those 3.5-hour jaunts from London to New York again? Not anytime soon, unfortunately. Still, one Canadian aerospace company is bringing us closer than ever to reliving that dream – at least in the realm of private jets.

Not many have heard of Bombardier, a business jet manufacturer headquartered in Montreal. The company trails the likes of Boeing, Airbus, and Embraer in sales volume, though it's still considered a leader in the business jet segment, especially at the high end.

Bombardier's new flagship, the Global 8000, is a near-supersonic private jet inspired by the Concorde. It promises stunning speed and an extraordinary range – all while pampering passengers with luxury amenities usually found in five-star hotels.

Set to become the fastest civilian aircraft since the Concorde's retirement, the Global 8000 boasts a top speed of Mach 0.94 (1,152 km/h) – just a whisker shy of breaking the sound barrier.

But it's not just about raw speed. This jet is a true globetrotter, with a jaw-dropping range of 8,000 nautical miles (14,816 km). That's enough to fly nonstop from New York to Sydney – with fuel to spare.

Stephen McCullough, Bombardier's Senior VP of Engineering and Product Development, explained that the company focused on what matters most to customers: range, speed, and comfort. "We asked ourselves, 'What can we do?'" he said.

The result – beyond the impressive numbers – is the innovative "Smooth Flex Wing" design, which essentially functions as two wings in one. It features a high-speed wing for speed and long-range cruising, plus a high-lift wing that enhances low-speed agility and dampens turbulence.

Inside, the Global 8000 offers plush interiors divided into four distinct living zones, including a luxurious Principal Suite with a full bed and optional shower. Bombardier has also equipped the cabin with its signature Nuage seats, designed to provide a weightless "zero-gravity" sensation that helps reduce back strain on long-haul flights. Passengers are surrounded by cutting-edge tech, including a system that lets them choose between fresh outside air or recirculated cabin air.

One major perk designed to reduce jet lag is the aircraft's low cabin altitude. It's pressurized to just 2,900 feet – even when flying above 40,000 feet – making it the lowest cabin altitude in its class, according to Bombardier.

Perhaps most importantly for busy executives, the Global 8000 can access significantly more airports than its competitors: 1,900 more in wet conditions, and a staggering 2,050 more when dry.

The jet is scheduled to enter service in the second half of 2025.

Permalink to story:

 
Not many have heard of Bombardier
That's like saying - not many have heard of private jets. Bombardier has always been there, shoulder to shoulder with GulfStream. It's like you are writing an article about CPU-s, and saying that not many have heard of AMD.

This jet is a true globetrotter, with a jaw-dropping range of 8,000 nautical miles (14,816 km). That's enough to fly nonstop from New York to Sydney – with fuel to spare.
No it's not, who's BS is this - yours or Bombardier's? Check the facts.... The flight distance from NY to Sydney is about 8650nm. At full speed, Global 8000 will be lucky to make 7000nm, and the rest will be on a flying pig.
 
Last edited:
Bombardier Global 8000
Entry into service was initially scheduled for 2017.By September 2016, it was delayed to early 2019.
 
I'm sure the left wing "green" types that preach everyone needs to stop using gas and what not, will be the FIRST ones to sign up to buy one too! LOL
 
I'd love to know what magic they've worked to travel at transonic speeds without the huge penalties. Above Mach 0.8 drag skyrockets causing massive fuel increase. Why do you think planes travel at no more than about 0.8x. While the aircraft itself may be traveling less than the speed of sound, the air going around the aircraft exceeds the speed of sound at some locations on the aircraft. In the regions where the local airspeed is near or greater than the speed of sound, you get compressibility effects and the air density may vary because of local shock waves and expansions, that can cause instabilities making flight highly unstable.

How have they solved this?
 
This jet could never fly nonstop from New York to Sydney because the hours taken for such a flight would exceed what is allowed for pilots. So in theory they would need a second flight crew on board to switch half way through the journey, but that won't happen because unlike many airliners who do such routes, their cabins are easily big enough to aoccomodate extra pilots (or have private crew rest areas) whereas in the G8, the spare crew would have to sit with the passengers (since there is no other space) and given the type of clients they would be taking - that is a no no.
 
That's like saying - not many have heard of private jets. Bombardier has always been there, shoulder to shoulder with GulfStream. It's like you are writing an article about CPU-s, and saying that not many have heard of AMD.

Bombardier was also known for a.o. trains, busses, snowscooters, quads, Can-am (Spyder & motorcycles). Those activities were sold, but some of these companies still use the name Bombardier.
 
This jet could never fly nonstop from New York to Sydney because the hours taken for such a flight would exceed what is allowed for pilots. So in theory they would need a second flight crew on board to switch half way through the journey, but that won't happen because unlike many airliners who do such routes, their cabins are easily big enough to aoccomodate extra pilots (or have private crew rest areas) whereas in the G8, the spare crew would have to sit with the passengers (since there is no other space) and given the type of clients they would be taking - that is a no no.
Do those regulations apply to private jets?
 
Back