Judge denies Apple's bid for a permanent injunction against Samsung

By Himanshu Arora ยท 6 replies
Aug 28, 2014
Post New Reply
  1. In a new setback for Apple, a federal judge has rejected the company's plea to ban US sales of Samsung smartphones that infringed on its patents. Apple had asked for a permanent injunction against certain Samsung mobile devices, most of which...

    Read more
  2. rub900

    rub900 TS Member Posts: 76   +6

    Maybe Apple is trying to be big brother and control all phone sales. They took the 1984 commercial a little too literally?
  3. Skidmarksdeluxe

    Skidmarksdeluxe TS Evangelist Posts: 8,647   +3,274

    Apple are unlikely to comment because just yet they're still sulking.
  4. Camikazi

    Camikazi TS Evangelist Posts: 925   +284

    If they did they missed the point of their own commercial :p
  5. Arris

    Arris TS Evangelist Posts: 4,730   +379

    Seriously, parsing text is patent-able???!!!
  6. Timonius

    Timonius TS Evangelist Posts: 647   +58

    They would make wiping your a*& patentable if they could get away with it. Only $0.99 per square.
  7. captaincranky

    captaincranky TechSpot Addict Posts: 13,029   +2,558

    ", US District Judge Lucy Koh said Apple failed to prove to the court that it deserves an injunction against infringing products."

    Hey wait a minute, "Koh", isn't that a Korean name, the same as "Samsung"?:oops:

    Why yes it is! : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ko_(Korean_surname)


Similar Topics

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...