G
Guest
Its still expensive especially since Apple just said at WWDC that Snow Leopard will be $29. I have been using windows 7 since RC1 came out and its a huge improvement over Vista but its still way to much money.
I actually ran ME (stepup edition) pretty problem free too.. But at least with ME I did actually know real people that had problems with it, every real person I know (not someone online) that runs Vista seems to run it without problems.I must have been the only one on Earth that *NEVER* had a problem with WinME. I had bought the $49.99 white box upgrade from 98SE, and it worked up until last year when I retired the computer.
Tell your IT department they are doing something wrong or buying crap hardware. Run decent hardware and Vista is stable. I've never seen a BSOD and never had the OS freeze on me (and very rarely a program, less so than XP), and I've been running Vista since its release. Vista Home Premium 32bit, and I'm on the same installation as I had from the start, made it through 2 service pack upgrades too with no issues.
So bottom line, you look like an ***** for trying to make a joke out of its stability.
I would like to confirm some of that. Vista x64 is a little bit more stable on my hardware. Plus in a few tests with some cross bit x64 vs x86 media software the 32 bit version was generating a bunch of page faults. I don't know if that us a direct result of the OS or the application, but given that x64 is more stable as a whole I would say it's the OS. Perhaps all these people with bad Vista experiences are all running x86 versions.
I agree completely. I don't run windows so I'm not really affected by this. But there are users that post on Linux forums with those sort of comments. Because it doesn't work for them then it mustn't work. I'd say that we see more of that type of user posting within the GNU/Linux community/userbase, whereas windows see more of the "it works for me" mentality. In general though it's simple: Users should use what works for them and understand that it might not be for everyone and also realise that no OS works perfectly on 100% of hardware.It's a direct reply to those who say "it doesn't work for me therefore it doesn't work" or even worse "I never tried, but heard it doesn't work for someone, therefore it doesn't work." So far in this particular discussion, "works for me" outweighs "doesn't work for me."