Intel to cut as many as 10,000 factory jobs, one of its largest-ever layoffs

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 746   +15
Staff
What just happened? Intel is preparing to lay off as much as one-fifth of its factory workforce in a move that will reshape one of the company's core business units. The layoffs, set to begin in July, are expected to affect more than 10,000 employees worldwide, marking one of the largest workforce reductions in Intel's history.

In a memo to employees, Intel Manufacturing Vice President Naga Chandrasekaran acknowledged the gravity of the decision. "These are difficult actions but essential to meet our affordability challenges and current financial position of the company. It drives pain to every individual," Chandrasekaran wrote, according to The Oregonian. The company is targeting job reductions between 15 percent and 20 percent, with most of the cuts taking place next month.

Intel declined to comment directly on the memo, but reiterated its commitment to "treat people with care and respect as we complete this important work." The company emphasized that "removing organizational complexity and empowering our engineers will enable us to better serve the needs of our customers and strengthen our execution. We are making these decisions based on careful consideration of what's needed to position our business for the future."

The layoffs will primarily impact Intel's foundry division, which includes a wide range of roles from technicians on the factory floor to researchers developing future generations of microprocessors. While Intel has not disclosed the exact number of factory workers, estimates suggest that about half of its 109,000 employees work in production or related services, meaning the cuts could eliminate between 8,000 and 11,000 jobs globally.

This round of layoffs comes after Intel eliminated 15,000 jobs across the company in 2024. The company is responding to a prolonged decline in sales and a challenging outlook, driven by stiff competition in the PC and data center markets and missed opportunities in artificial intelligence chips.

Intel reported an $821 million loss in the first quarter of 2025 and has steadily reduced its headcount from nearly 125,000 in 2023.

Unlike last year, when job reductions included buyouts and early retirement offers, Intel does not plan to offer voluntary departures this time. Instead, the company will select which workers to let go based on investment priorities and individual performance. "These reductions will be based on a combination of portfolio changes, level and position elimination, skill assessment for remaining positions, and some hard decisions around our project investments. We are also taking into consideration factory operations impact," Chandrasekaran stated in the memo.

The cuts will be felt across the company's 15 wafer fabrication plants at 10 locations worldwide. Key roles such as engineers working on advanced process technologies and skilled technicians managing critical lithography equipment are considered vital and are unlikely to be affected, while positions made redundant by automation or efficiency initiatives may be trimmed.

Intel's restructuring comes amid uncertainty over federal and state subsidies. The company received $1 billion from the federal CHIPS Act last year as part of a larger $7.9 billion package, but much of the remaining funding is in limbo as the Trump administration reviews ongoing awards.

New CEO Lip-Bu Tan, who took the helm in March, has repeatedly stressed the need to streamline Intel's operations, reduce management layers, and accelerate the deployment of new technologies. "I'm a big believer in the philosophy that the best leaders get the most done with the fewest people," Tan said in an April memo. The company's challenge now is to convince its workforce and investors that it can chart a growth path, even as it makes deep cuts to its operations.

Permalink to story:

 
Basically, the CEO stated not long time ago that margins needs to be more important for Intel Business Model to withhold competition pressure.

They can do that by two options... raising prices, or cutting their costs.

Laying off their workforce is going with cutting costs, however with 25% less workforce, I doubt that Intel will be able to maintain any competitive edge to be able to drive their margins back where the company Business Model could be viable.

Going after TSMC, after failing to maintain their leadership against AMD, is going to be their demise.

They are in a vicious circle that will lead them to their doom if they don't get rid of their fabs, but if they do so, they will lose all their government subsidization which will only accelerate their downfall.
 
Basically, the CEO stated not long time ago that margins needs to be more important for Intel Business Model to withhold competition pressure.

They can do that by two options... raising prices, or cutting their costs.

Laying off their workforce is going with cutting costs, however with 25% less workforce, I doubt that Intel will be able to maintain any competitive edge to be able to drive their margins back where the company Business Model could be viable.

Going after TSMC, after failing to maintain their leadership against AMD, is going to be their demise.

They are in a vicious circle that will lead them to their doom if they don't get rid of their fabs, but if they do so, they will lose all their government subsidization which will only accelerate their downfall.
Without the fabs, they have no chance of competing either, since TSMC is already loaded up, where would intels massive orders come from? Not to mention they’d have to pay the middle man for all those chips.

Intel sells several times what AMD sells, even today, and AMD has trouble keeping up with demand.

They need to take a serious cleaver to middle management and get some innovation into those fabs pronto.
 
Feel sorry for the workers, but they let the marketeers that ruin the party...

The cycle seems to be:

Find out what customers want (“all the features, no artificial locks, accelerators enabled, transparency”).

Do the exact opposite.

Slather it in “Performance for the Real Professional” branding.

Ship a new PowerPoint with 60% of the features fused off.

Go home, pour a drink.

Next day: Repeat!

 
Intel is like a lot of big companies through the years. Once they reach the "peak" a lot of them sit back and enjoy it and stop "inventing".
Look at Xerox for example. I remember the tv ads in the 70's..."it's just as good as a Xerox". Now, Xerox has so much better competition.
Look at the American automobile industry. Once the top...then the oil crisis hit and they fell to the floor, while Japan, Germany, and others came in.
Look at Sears. One of the biggest catalog stores until the internet came along. Now they are gone.

 
Intel’s foundry strategy was supposed to be their comeback arc and now it feels like they’re speedrunning the “we regret to inform you” part. Cutting tens of thousands while trying to win government subsidies and compete with TSMC sounds like trying to play 4D chess while flipping the board.

 
Lives are not ruined when a layoff happens at a big company unless individuals become over dramatic about the decision. Nearly everyone in the workforce will have to move 7-10 times in their life. People become better when they work in a variety of fields and complete more tasks optimally.
 
Lives are not ruined when a layoff happens at a big company unless individuals become over dramatic about the decision. Nearly everyone in the workforce will have to move 7-10 times in their life. People become better when they work in a variety of fields and complete more tasks optimally.

Y'know, time was when a career with one company that spanned your working life was viewed favourably by everyone in business. When did it change to "Swap jobs every few months for 40-odd years, demonstrating no loyalty to anyone.....and no ability to stick at anything either"?

I have the strangest feeling this is somehow related to the insistence that every young person has the God-given right to expect to go to university......resulting in an over-qualified population that think everything is beneath them, and are consequently unemployable by almost everyone out there. I appreciate that with an ever-increasing population, and finite global resources, it's a dog-eat-dog world out there, but......honestly. Is this what we're coming to?

What price hubris?

Miq.
 
Y'know, time was when a career with one company that spanned your working life was viewed favourably by everyone in business. When did it change to "Swap jobs every few months for 40-odd years, demonstrating no loyalty to anyone.....and no ability to stick at anything either"?

I have the strangest feeling this is somehow related to the insistence that every young person has the God-given right to expect to go to university......resulting in an over-qualified population that think everything is beneath them, and are consequently unemployable by almost everyone out there. I appreciate that with an ever-increasing population, and finite global resources, it's a dog-eat-dog world out there, but......honestly. Is this what we're coming to?

What price hubris?

Miq.
Lot's to be said about a secure and charted life path. Life has gotten insanely hard. And only getting harder. My best bud just died from cancer at 36. Life was too hard for his character type. Nobody is making all the rules out here you just have to remember that you are blessed to be here and fight to stay.
 
Back