Modern Warfare 3 launch trailer unveiled

Wow. Wow wow wow wow. I know most bf3 fans are uninformed and full of **** but wow. Of coruse they have the same bloody voice actors in a sequel, that's like saying the Dark knight is the same as Batman Begins because both have Bale, Caine and Freeman in them, Jesus.

A new campaign, new survival, new weapons, new multiplayer modes, revised physics, new maps, new perks, new features and polished visuals is a new game. BF3 plays exactly the same as BF2, barely any different from BC and BC2 yet you act as if it's revolutionised gaming. Grow up.
 
Burty117 said:
Oh No don't get me wrong red! It wasn't new at all, but it was new for COD?
which is why i think they should simply kill this dead horse (that presumably, is being dragged along with a tow rope through several extended cut scenes) and go spend some money on a shiney new horse? sure the discovery of a horse is nothing new but a new horse is certainly better than a dead rotting one that has been pulled one two many cut scenes?

If you get my drift ;)
Click to expand...

:haha: right.

Guest said:
Wow. Wow wow wow wow. I know most bf3 fans are uninformed and full of **** but wow.
Click to expand...

Grow up.
Click to expand...

well that was ironic.:p

1) it's just a video game
2) it's completely subjective.
3) How's the benefit package over there at Activision?
 
Since this is a computer tech site you will find far more people interested in playing BF3 then Call of Recycle 3.

I'm going to try and pickup a copy of BF3 tomorrow in store if the line up isn't to long. I haven't been interested in the COD series since COD4. And I don't plan on going back, whenever I go to my boy place and they are playing MW2 or blackops on either ps3 or 360 and you get some lil puke that is 11 swearing at you like he is king kong I just laugh.

To each his own but COD is no longer for me I prefer to play with adults my own age.
 
arent these new mw really just expansions since they are for the same old 7 year old consoles?
 
sad how people argue between MW3 and BF3. its a waste of time, they are too completely different games, and one is currently dominating. if you did not see MW3 introduction for this year E3 event than I provide a link below. I have to say from what I have seen, the game makers focus more of there time on the story line. It is going to be Epic.

Here's the official first Modern Warfare 3 game play at E3.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=UfkN3T7KHGE

Enjoy!
 
Looks awful. If you don't care about graphics or gameplay, then why even play video games?
 
How MW3's trailer makes the news on Techspot and not Battlefield 3's is absolutely beyond me...
 
COD is such a wannabe game, their big claim to fame is that they're realistic, but that's bull. Like u would ever use a throwing knife in real warfare. And sniping is way too easy and unrealistic. Whereas battlefields sniping takes skill, and also there are no medics in COD, the reality of battlefield has won me over. BF3 FTW!!!!
 
Dude you keep saying modern warfare 3 is a repeat and nothing has changed...battlefield 3 is the same i mean its just real world mechanics and building destruction each time so its all the same.
 
Its nice to see developers out there that are making games just for the young.

While others like DICE are making more mature games just for our more adult taste.
 
I have played the new MW3 at LA XP and I can honestly say. Its a learning curve just like COD4 to MW2 and it will make experienced players shutter once more until they get the hang of it. And yes, it still seems amazing to me.

-Josh
 
I can honestly say that I enjoy both games for different reasons. I can say I enjoy BF3 for its single player campaign and frankly thats about it. Their mulitplayer seems to be very unbalanced and crude. For example, I join a BF BC2 game and I notice all the vehicles are gone, the people driving them are very rarely killed and score alot of points. Also when I play solo with random people against a squad of friends, I get absolutely murdered with no chance of a come back. In retrospect comparison to MW2, the odds were much more user friendly. Meaning that, if you were a good player, you had a chance to hold your team up and still win because your a skilled individual. BF BC2 doesn't have that luxury. I also enjoy the single player on MW because it's a movie like experience and I just so happen to enjoy those types of things. I believe that BF3 should be played and enjoyed on the PC due to the much larger player cap, but just don't expect me to mindlessly follow the BF crowd. Medal of Honor was made by the same company and I don't think I have to remind anyone about that gem. I foresee beating the single player campaign in BF3 as well as MW3, but I think overall that MW3 will have the better replay value and my vote.

Thanks for your time
-Josh
 
Already have MW3 hardened edition pre-ordered. If I get BF3 it will be strictly for the campaign gameplay. I do not like the multiplayer engine that EA uses. I played MoH and BF3 was way too much like that. MoH was another game with great Campaign and terrible Multiplayer. I'm sure CoD will break it's previous records.
I just can't wait for the games to both be out so all the fan boys will stop with the smack talking and just play whatever game they want
 
Did you think BF3 was horrible because you can't camp like you can on call of duty? Battlefield is a real man's game, completely realistic.
 
lawfer said:
How MW3's trailer makes the news on Techspot and not Battlefield 3's is absolutely beyond me...
Click to expand...

Agreed!

The trailer is awesome! on a couple of the shots I actually struggled to tell the difference between the game and real life! :)
 
red1776 said:
Burty117 said:
Oh No don't get me wrong red! It wasn't new at all, but it was new for COD?
which is why i think they should simply kill this dead horse (that presumably, is being dragged along with a tow rope through several extended cut scenes) and go spend some money on a shiney new horse? sure the discovery of a horse is nothing new but a new horse is certainly better than a dead rotting one that has been pulled one two many cut scenes?

If you get my drift ;)
Click to expand...

:haha: right.

Guest said:
Wow. Wow wow wow wow. I know most bf3 fans are uninformed and full of **** but wow.
Click to expand...

Grow up.
Click to expand...

well that was ironic.:p

1) it's just a video game
2) it's completely subjective.
3) How's the benefit package over there at Activision?
Click to expand...

Agreed, no need to be so angry Guest, I'm not stating that the entire COD series is rubbish compared to BF, I'm just saying what impression the trailer gave me? Jeesss
 
greedy greedy they are....
I agree the price is way more than it should be....
I will think about the purchase of the game...
:)
 
Bleah... who cares about a clip with cut-out scenes? I bypass them even in the game itself (when possible). Show the actual game play!
 
I don't care about either game, to be honest; I just take issue with their claim that it's the "Most Anticipated Game In History." I question their definition of "most anticipated." I could name a half dozen games that, historically speaking, were far more anticipated. MW2 didn't happen long enough ago for this one to gain anticipation of historic proportions. Anyway, I'm pretty certain that both Diablo III and Starcraft II were more anticipated. Heck, even Fallout 3. Possibly the original Fable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Helldivers 2's daily player count on Steam matches Modern Warfare II and Apex Legends
Replies
8
Views
182
erickmendes
erickmendes
midian182
Activision justifies Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3's massive install size
Replies
15
Views
652
texasrattler
T
midian182
Modern Warfare 3's Metacritic score is a new low for the Call of Duty series
Replies
10
Views
410
ID10T
ID10T

Latest posts

Back