TheBigFatClown
Posts: 1,110 +495
I don't. I'm actually a fan of ModernUI. The performance gains from Windows 7 to 8 were worth it alone. Not to mention that Win7 will not be able to support future monitor resolutions or newer versions of DirectX, if you're going to want to keep current you will have to upgrade. Lots of people don't like the 'flat' look of it, but honestly a LOT of UI design is going that way nowdays, not just MS. 5 years ago everything was about skeumorphism; design styles change, not everyone is going to like where trends go.
And also, all those colors and everything? They're totally changeable. And if you don't like it, I'm sure by launch people will have custom shells and start menus that you can install, though I wouldn't be suprised if on the Pro edition that you'll have the capability to turn it all off to bring a more traditional start menu back. Win 8.1 is a huge improvement over Win7, just for the search and admin tools alone. I'm looking forward to 9.
Crippling a UI by digressing to a caveman like appearance? Yeah, I could see how that would yield some nice performance gains on systems that aren't that powerful to begin with. My only minor, minor complaint about Windows 7 is that it does take a while for the hard drive to settle down after some update/reboot operations. But my solution to my own complaint is to purchase an SSD sometime in the near future. Rather than digressing into an operating system with square boxes and 16 different colors as some new hip color scheme. And we still can't deny the WHY of Windows 8. WHY is it using square Windows and 4-bit color schemes? The answer is still the same. Because they wanted to be the next Apple at the expense of their own desktop market. They thought everybody would just hop on board and they would be as successful as Apple. It just isn't happening that way.
If everything is about performance gains at the expense of everything else you might wanna try to switching to a Linux OS without a graphical front end. That should get you even more performance gains than Windows 8. To have my system boot to desktop a few nanoseconds faster than it does now at the expense of having to work in a childrens UI 24 hours a day, 7 days a week...guess what? I would be more than happy to wait that time out. And that's exactly what I will continue to do. Windows 8 was a disaster and Microsoft is doubling down. Amazing. Hey Microsoft, careful, icebergs dead ahead. Oh, but they don't scare you, do they?
You sacrificed a hell of a lot of style, flexibility and power for a quicker boot experience. LOL. To each their own.
Last edited: