bexwhitt
Posts: 678 +423
that's what I went for, more than good enough for 1080pMake 199$ and I will take one. If not, then best budget GPU is still by far RX 6600
that's what I went for, more than good enough for 1080pMake 199$ and I will take one. If not, then best budget GPU is still by far RX 6600
It would have been been great if Ray Tracing benchmarks were also included, even if only couple of them, to drive home the point that how utterly useless Ray tracing is for lower segment.I want to point out that both cards will perform really badly with RT enabled.
Ray Tracing is unless full stop, people who spend $1000 plus on a card want high performance which turning on RTX killsIt would have been been great if Ray Tracing benchmarks were also included, even if only couple of them, to drive home the point that how utterly useless Ray tracing is for lower segment.
This is rhetorical right? haha, we all know why.Why didn’t they just call this the 3050 Ti![]()
It would have been been great if Ray Tracing benchmarks were also included, even if only couple of them, to drive home the point that how utterly useless Ray tracing is for lower segment.
This and the RX 6500 XT says both AMD and nVidia are large corporations whose every action is designed to optimize profits. Intel Arc isn't exactly a great value for gamers either.As someone who only buys Radeons, stories like this make me laugh because it demonstrates to me just how low nVidia's opinion is of their customers' intelligence.
I can't say that I blame them though because no matter what they do, people still buy their products. If nVidia's customers don't care enough about themselves to prevent nVidia giving them (as the British would say) "A right buggering!", why should nVidia give a damn about their customers?
False equivalency. AMD has never been willing to go as far as nVidia in that regard.This and the RX 6500 XT says both AMD and nVidia are large corporations whose every action is designed to optimize profits.
Nothing is a good value when it doesn't work.Intel Arc isn't exactly a great value for gamers either.
The RX6500 XT isn't a bad product, just terrible pricing. The 8GB 3060 is just misleading, it should be called something else like 3060LE or 3050ti even.This and the RX 6500 XT says both AMD and nVidia are large corporations whose every action is designed to optimize profits. Intel Arc isn't exactly a great value for gamers either.
That's true. If someone just buys it for general use, it's fine. As you say though, it's far too expensive for what it is. OTOH, if only AMD had put PCI-Express x8 instead of x4, it would've been so much better a product, regardless of price.The RX6500 XT isn't a bad product, just terrible pricing. The 8GB 3060 is just misleading, it should be called something else like 3060LE or 3050ti even.
No. Once again I must remind that 6500XT is very small and cheap Mobile GPU. Putting PCIe x8 for small and cheap Mobile GPU would have made it much worse for it's intended usage.That's true. If someone just buys it for general use, it's fine. As you say though, it's far too expensive for what it is. OTOH, if only AMD had put PCI-Express x8 instead of x4, it would've been so much better a product, regardless of price.
Why? Since when is having more bandwidth a bad thing?No. Once again I must remind that 6500XT is very small and cheap Mobile GPU. Putting PCIe x8 for small and cheap Mobile GPU would have made it much worse for it's intended usage.
When it wastes die area? More cost and less availabilty for almost nothing since APU's it was meant to be paired with supported PCIe 4.0 anyway.Why? Since when is having more bandwidth a bad thing?
Yeah it might have actually beat the RX 5500 XT lol. Still it punches above it's weight. I fully expect AMD to sell them for years at $100, it will effectively be the entry card for them like the RX 570 was for a while. X4 graphics cards shouldn't even be considered. It'll be interesting if they have a replacement planned in for form of Navi 34 but I doubt they will.That's true. If someone just buys it for general use, it's fine. As you say though, it's far too expensive for what it is. OTOH, if only AMD had put PCI-Express x8 instead of x4, it would've been so much better a product, regardless of price.
I honestly think that a more appropriate name would be "RTX 3050 Ti".Shouldn't they offer this "3060" as an OEM only card instead? Or at least name it the RTX3060 LE.
Well, the problem in this case is that, as Steve pointed out, the card suffers considerably with PCI-Express 3.0 motherboards.When it wastes die area? More cost and less availabilty for almost nothing since APU's it was meant to be paired with supported PCIe 4.0 anyway.