Nvidia reaches historic 92% GPU market share, leaves AMD and Intel far behind

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,926   +53
Staff
The big picture: In our review of the 8GB variant of Nvidia's RTX 5060 Ti, we suggested that the GeForce 50 lineup might go down as the company's worst ever. Yet despite scarcity at more reasonable pricing, fierce competition from AMD, and plenty of criticism, Team Green's latest family of graphics cards has propelled it to unprecedented market dominance (even without taking AI into consideration).

According to Jon Peddie Research, total sales of dedicated desktop graphics cards reached 9.2 million units in the first quarter of 2025 – an increase of more than 8% both year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter. Although both Nvidia and AMD launched new GPU lineups during this period, Nvidia benefited far more.

Nvidia sold millions of RTX 50 series GPUs between January and March, while AMD's Radeon 9000 series shipped fewer than 750,000 units. Nvidia's market share surged to a historic 92%, squeezing AMD down to an all-time low of 8% and leaving nothing for Intel. Jon Peddie told Tom's Hardware that underproduction on AMD's side is the primary factor behind this dramatic gap.

AMD reported "unprecedented" demand for the RX 9070 and 9070 XT in March, suggesting that it was caught off guard and is now racing to ramp up supply.

The company also faces the added challenge of balancing its allocation of TSMC semiconductors between Radeon GPUs and Ryzen 9000 CPUs, which have also been in short supply following a strong market response. Interestingly, German GPU sales from last month – outside the scope of the Jon Peddie report – showed AMD ahead of Nvidia, hinting that upcoming financial briefs could reveal growing momentum for AMD's cards if production can catch up.

Nvidia, meanwhile, expanded its already dominant market position despite releasing some of the least exciting graphics products in recent memory. In our reviews, we noted that the RTX 50 series GPUs deliver little performance uplift over the RTX 40 Super lineup.

During recent coverage of Nvidia's quarterly financials, the company's gaming revenue (PC graphics cards) surged to a record $3.8 billion, up 42% year-over-year and 48% quarter-over-quarter. That's the fastest growth rate the gaming GPU segment has seen in years.

However an "overlooked" factor behind gaming revenue growth may be the increasing diversion of high-end consumer GPUs into small-scale AI operations. As demand for AI compute spreads beyond large data centers to startups and independent developers, some gaming-class GPUs – especially higher-end RTX cards – are being repurposed for machine learning workloads.

To AMD's credit, their latest Radeons finally caught up to Nvidia in ray tracing performance and upscaling image quality after trailing for several GPU generations. That triumph, alongside larger VRAM pools in some products, has allowed the $600+ Radeon 9070 XT to outpace its direct competitors and touch the $1,000 RTX 5080 in certain scenarios.

Upcoming quarterly reports will shed more light on the battle between mainstream GPUs such as the RTX 5060, RX 9060, and possibly the Intel Arc B770. While AMD scrambles to increase production, Nvidia may scale back consumer GPU output to refocus on its true revenue driver: AI chips.

Permalink to story:

 
RX 90 wasn't launched until close to the end of Q1, which at that point all but two RTX 50 cards had been launched, so the figures presented in this article are lacking such context. "Millions of RTX 50 cards" could mean as few as 2 Million, over the span of about 13 weeks, vs under 750k RX, but over the span of just 3.5 weeks until the end of Q1.
 
I said it before in the other article that was basically this same info, the amazing RTX 50 sales numbers are not to gamers. They are from AI startups and companies buying them as cheap alternatives to the server/AI grade cards. The AI boom/bubble is possibly worse than the crypto bubble. The AI bubble still has a few years to go and is pretty much holding up the entire stock market right now. Love or hate Nvidia, they happen to be the company with the product everyone wants. It just really sucks that AMD and Intel can't get the s**t together and make a real difference in the gaming GPU market.
 
I'd buy a 9070 XT in a heartbeat if I could actually find one near MSRP. bump up that production and you'd bump up those numbers!
 
I've had Nvidia cards for a very long time before buying my 7900 XTX last summer, and I think the current market is really bad, because AMD cards are really good. The 7900 XTX is a really good card, and the 9xxx series is also really good (apart from the 8GB versions... *please* AMD -and Nvidia!-, what the heck!?) It's cheaper, and what you lose is not much compared to Nvidia. I did a lot of research before making the jump last year, and I must say I do not regret it.

Frankly, upscaling is better on the latest series, but when gaming, you don't notice the difference 99% of the time, if ever...
So yes, when my 7900 XTX is struggling, I will think about a replacement, but for now, I'll keep it for as long as I can.
This is a sad state of affairs for PC gamers... either way, you can't help feeling that, somehow, you are being scammed...
 
The bulk buying is done by corporations and includes pre built PCs and laptops. Plus all those those buying them for AI.
No real surprise here.
 
RX 90 wasn't launched until close to the end of Q1, which at that point all but two RTX 50 cards had been launched, so the figures presented in this article are lacking such context. "Millions of RTX 50 cards" could mean as few as 2 Million, over the span of about 13 weeks, vs under 750k RX, but over the span of just 3.5 weeks until the end of Q1.
So math isn’t your strong suit then?

Regardless of your wordplay to make “millions” only 2 million, 92% means 92%… if you give AMD 750,000 sales then nvidia sold 8,625,000.

 
I've had Nvidia cards for a very long time before buying my 7900 XTX last summer, and I think the current market is really bad, because AMD cards are really good. The 7900 XTX is a really good card, and the 9xxx series is also really good (apart from the 8GB versions... *please* AMD -and Nvidia!-, what the heck!?) It's cheaper, and what you lose is not much compared to Nvidia. I did a lot of research before making the jump last year, and I must say I do not regret it.

Frankly, upscaling is better on the latest series, but when gaming, you don't notice the difference 99% of the time, if ever...
So yes, when my 7900 XTX is struggling, I will think about a replacement, but for now, I'll keep it for as long as I can.
This is a sad state of affairs for PC gamers... either way, you can't help feeling that, somehow, you are being scammed...
The 7900 XTX is a powerful card, I'd not change it for anything this gen (or maybe even the next - I'm still holding onto a 6950 XT!). Thing is tho, consumer sentiment towards the card (and the 9070 XT) is poor.

Tell a casual gamer the XTX has performance parity with the RTX 4080 / RTX 5070 Ti they won't believe you. Herein lies AMD's problem trying to sell anything to consumers.
 
AMD shipped many 9000 series cards last year, that's why there is much less 9000 series cards shipped Q1/2025.

This article also totally forgets that most of those GPUs sold are in fact mobile GPUs. AMD have mostly integrated solutions whereas Nvidia have only discrete ones. So this is NOT about desktop discrete card sales at all, it's all discrete chips including mobile.

@Daniel Sims : Topic is totally wrong, Intel still owns majority of GPU market. This is discrete only.
 
AMD shipped many 9000 series cards last year, that's why there is much less 9000 series cards shipped Q1/2025.

This article also totally forgets that most of those GPUs sold are in fact mobile GPUs. AMD have mostly integrated solutions whereas Nvidia have only discrete ones. So this is NOT about desktop discrete card sales at all, it's all discrete chips including mobile.
It doesn’t include integrated GPU though… otherwise Intel would be much higher than 0…
 
So math isn’t your strong suit then?

Regardless of your wordplay to make “millions” only 2 million, 92% means 92%… if you give AMD 750,000 sales then nvidia sold 8,625,000.

It appears reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit; no actual sales figures were given in this article, just top-end estimations.

The intent of my comment was merely to highlight the difference in the amount of time available each lineup was available within Q1; it was meant to provide relevant context to the negative spin against AMD. Which is why I made no claims to actual sales figures, since “under 750k” can also include figures as low as 150k-250k.

So yeah, Reading Comprehension. Try it next time.
 
I'd buy a 9070 XT in a heartbeat if I could actually find one near MSRP. bump up that production and you'd bump up those numbers!
My 3 month prediction seems to be getting closer to reality. We should see pricing getting closer to MSRP by black Friday. The 5090 already went from $4000 to $2759 ( available at microcenter collecting dust currently) within a few months). This would put pressure on everything below as prices normalize. Rumors are AMD is ramping up supply for the 9070 xt and MLID is claiming 9090xt and.or 9080xt to compete with Nvidia's 5080 and 5070 super class cards. This should improve pricing. Lastly their are Rumors of Intel's b770 hovering in the background.
 
It appears reading comprehension isn’t your strong suit; no actual sales figures were given in this article, just top-end estimations.

The intent of my comment was merely to highlight the difference in the amount of time available each lineup was available within Q1; it was meant to provide relevant context to the negative spin against AMD. Which is why I made no claims to actual sales figures, since “under 750k” can also include figures as low as 150k-250k.

So yeah, Reading Comprehension. Try it next time.
Except that’s not correct - AMD actually did sell 740-750k 9000 series GPUs during q1… and Nvidia did sell close to 9 mill…
 
The only thing that bothers me is the split between EVGA and NVIDIA.
I wanted to replace my 3090 Kingpin with a 4090 Kingpin and a 5090 to follow it.
I am absolutely disappointed I can't.
 
Between 2017 and now, Nvidia also went to dominating my portfolio. I knew they'd do well, but I never expected them to be here.
 
The only thing that bothers me is the split between EVGA and NVIDIA.
I wanted to replace my 3090 Kingpin with a 4090 Kingpin and a 5090 to follow it.
I am absolutely disappointed I can't.
Nvidia’s partners are desperately trying to diversify their portfolio to stay afloat.
Zotac fragrance anyone? 🤪
 
So math isn’t your strong suit then?

Regardless of your wordplay to make “millions” only 2 million, 92% means 92%… if you give AMD 750,000 sales then nvidia sold 8,625,000.
nvidia had 3 months to sell 5090s etc before the 9000 series released. just because a hooker is available on the street corner while your wife is in the hospital for 3 months doesn't make the hooker the better product lol even though the hooker is raking in more sales.
 
Back