Read the full article at:
https://www.techspot.com/review/499-samsung-galaxy-note/
Please leave your feedback here.
https://www.techspot.com/review/499-samsung-galaxy-note/
Please leave your feedback here.
In my experience, Samsung's earlier Galaxy S II models performed more smoothly and the global version of the Galaxy Note (sans LTE) is also a speedy performer. This leads me to believe that the software on this particular Note for AT&T is not fully optimized to take advantage of the hardware underneath.
Guest said:
Disappointing conclusion in the article. Was hoping to get one, but given what they said about it in the review, I may have to reconsider now.
Milwaukeemike said:
2nd sentence... "Straddling the line between a smartphone and a tablet, the Note features a massive 5.3-inch display" Massive? Whales are massive. 5.3 inches is not 'massive' Especially coming from a website where I read about the new 8 inch iPad MINI. 8 inches is mini and 5.3 is massive?
Yeah, I get it. 5.3 inches is big for a phone, but isn't this supposed to be 'straddling the line between a phone and a tablet?' Why didn't you treat it like a small tablet and see how it worked? You did the whole review as if it's a phone that's too big to be a phone. Maybe try it like it's a small tablet you can make calls with and see how you like it. Try a bluetooth headset.
The size is the obvious special feature about this thing, and yet there's no speculation as to whom it's marketed towards. The business community, art students, doctors who need to sign a prescription via an app?
I know it's more fun to talk about how big it is (HEY NOW!), but is it possible you missed the point of it?