Burty117
Posts: 5,108 +3,688
Has the US or any NATO member explicitly said they need to go to war with Russia?The question is, if all of this is true, why is it then so crucial that Ukraine join NATO and that we start a war against a country on the verge of collapsing all by itself?
I do get that Ukraine shouldn't be somewhat forced into NATO by the West but after what's currently happening now, could you blame Ukraine for now wanting to be in NATO?
Putin should have tried much harder to be friends with Ukraine, not start a war with them.
Pre this war, I would completely agree, after this war (assuming Russia gives up that is) well, Russia certainly won't be helping Ukraine to re-build, I bet the EU and the west in general help re-build Ukraine.The US and Russia alike need to get out of Ukraine.
I don't think you understand what the acronym stands for, here, I'll quickly give you the definition:Perhaps liberal media didn't explain "BRIC" to you: Brazil, India, Russia, China
"BRIC is a grouping acronym which refers to the countries of Brazil, Russia, India and China deemed to be developing countries at a similar stage of newly advanced economic development, on their way to becoming developed countries."
Oh, They're all on Russia's side are they? I'm fairly certain India and China are Neutral in all this and Brazil has openly said, actually let me get the quote...There's at least 3 Billion people on Russia's side.
"Brazil's position is clear... We are on the side of world peace," Franca told a news conference in Lisbon when asked if he condemned the invasion. "We think we can reach that (peace)... by helping to find a way out (of the war), not by taking sides."
I'm just saying, if you look at the western world, the amount of countries backing up and actively supporting and supplying Ukraine is much larger vs Russia's allies that all appear to be doing basically nothing.