The Best PC Speakers 2019

I've really fallen in love with my Vanatoo Transparent One Encores (T1E) lately. I have them paired with an old Infinity TSS-Sub4000 sub I retired a few years ago and they blend really well. Staging is great without having to pay too much for a decent setup. Admittedly it seems odd to spend less on this setup than the headphone setup for the same PC. It's not the best but it's pretty good for the price.

If I had the money I'd like to give the KEF LS50 Wireless a try though I've never heard them.
 
I've had the Klipsch Promedia 2.1s for over a decade and they're still kicking. Phenomenal quality speakers!!! Wouldn't ever consider another pair. Now, I've never turned up the volume beyond 20% because they are THAT powerful. Honestly, anyone living in a condo/apartment would never need 200 Watts RMS, but it's there if you ever want the neighbors to call the police. :)
 
Fostex does fine audio quality for me.
PRO.3, PRO.4 or PRO.5
Agreed.

PRO.3 is what I have ... I bought them ~8 years ago when they were dirt cheap. I think I paid $120CAD for the pair (that's about $90USD)

Absolutely amazing sounding speakers for both the price and size. Not huge on the bass, but dead flat down to ~70hz and audible bass down to ~40hz - impressive for a 2.5" bass driver.

Mids and highs are so accurate I can now hear flaws in music that lesser quality speakers would never be able to reveal. The sound stage of these things is mind boggling - I keep thinking I have surround sound ...

When I was shopping for new PC/audio speakers I was torn between these and some small Mackies ... while I didn't have the luxury of intimate testing with the Mackies, I have no doubt I made a good decision with the Fostex.

Extremely highly recommended (if you can still get them) ... if one needs punchier bass, the PRO.5 works well if you have the desk space for them. I am able to use mine with my sub, but to be honest I find the sub just muddies the beautiful sound of the .3's.
 
Last edited:
I agree. There are lots of options out there in this class. However, I think it best that people educate themselves since many manufacturers play the watts of power game, especially, I bet, PC speaker makers, with peak power ratings at 10% THD which, likely will not sound good - IMO.

Agree here as well.

Now that I have become a bit of a audiophile, advertised "watts" is usually not anywhere in my purchasing decision anywhere at all.

If I see advertised something like "50w @ 10% THD" - I immediately think, "ok, so we probably have about only 10 - 20w of actually useable power here, and I don't know the distortion at lower levels ... hmmmm what if 1% THD is the best it can muster?" -- unless maybe its through a <65hz subwoofer, 10%THD is going to sound horrific; so even allowing the amp to output 50w is way beyond what it is actually capable of in any reasonable listening experience ...

Likewise if I see "10w @ 0.1% THD" - I know that the amp is likely capable of at least a usable 20w range before distortion properly sets in, but, I also know that the mfgr wanted me to know that 0.1%THD is possible with this system - which indicates a high quality sound, and a potentially higher output level that will still sound great. I would choose this over the 50w system I described above, even though the manufacturers rating is "only" 10w.

Also people tend to associate watts with how loud a speaker can be - but without knowing the sensitivity and impedance of the speaker/amp, watts alone does not dictate loudness either.

Frequency range is also a consideration to quality, but is also abused in marketing.
60-18,000hz at -6dbs will be likely superior to 40-21,000hz at -12dbs. Cheaper brands will use the -12db metric to try to make it looks like the range is better than it probably is, but any quality speaker brand will likely use the -6db metric. It should be listed - if not, assume -12db. Either way, knowing the difference between the two is really what is needed to interpret the frequency range data that manufacturers list.

So TL;DR

1) Watt metric is almost useless unless you know and understand the THD rating.
2) Frequency range data is almost useless without knowing if the metric used is -6db or -12db - and understand what each metric means.

Research is needed to narrow down choices, after that, listen to them and choose what works for your ears best.
 
If I see advertised something like "50w @ 10% THD" - I immediately think, "ok, so we probably have about only 10 - 20w of actually useable power here, and I don't know the distortion at lower levels ... hmmmm what if 1% THD is the best it can muster?" -- unless maybe its through a <65hz subwoofer, 10%THD is going to sound horrific; so even allowing the amp to output 50w is way beyond what it is actually capable of in any reasonable listening experience ...
The next time you hear the car next to you rattling along with their subwoofer, well, that is what a poor subwoofer/installation can sound like. :laughing:

Then again, I spoiled myself WRT subwoofers over 20-years ago when I bought a Paradigm Servo-15 for home theater use. It "only" has a 400W output, but the sound is very clean.

BTW - Nice post. I think it is great to see people not buying into marketing speak.
 
...
Then again, I spoiled myself WRT subwoofers over 20-years ago when I bought a Paradigm Servo-15 for home theater use. It "only" has a 400W output, but the sound is very clean.

Indeed ...

"Loud" bass can be easy and cheap. Clean, low frequency bass with low distortion is a whole different ballgame and requires some serious effort in the enclosure design (especially to get something compact). And the ears will thank you for the latter. :)
 
Last edited:
I don't buy anything nowadays. I'm still using a set of Logitech X-140's from like 10 years ago and they still sound great.
I know there are a lot of people that just don't care for sound quality.
Some are even using display built-in speakers - it's a nightmare for me to even imagine using it, but for some, it's a daily driver, "good enough".
 
Hard to believe that a pair of active bookshelf fill all the audiophile's gaps, there are plenty of good stuff out there within that price range, now comes to my mind some cheap marantz or cambridge stereo amp, coupled with a pair Dynaudio emit m20 speakers or Dali Zenzor or Monitor Audio bronze speakers, whatever you like and fit your pocket, because one of the most important thing audiophiles look for is versatility, the possibility of trying a new set of speakers or a new amp. Or maybe that's just me...

Edit: I'm not saying that a cheap Marantz or Cambridge Audio stereo amplifier are a bad thing, but there are stereo amps that cost like if they were a space rocket, even from these brands, but you can find a good well-rounded stereo amp without breaking the bank, I don't recall the models, but I do remember a few from the 2 brands I mentioned before.-
Wrong - one of THE most important things Audiophiles 'look' for in a speaker, is SOUND QUALITY!
 
I know there are a lot of people that just don't care for sound quality.
Some are even using display built-in speakers - it's a nightmare for me to even imagine using it, but for some, it's a daily driver, "good enough".

They are lacking Bass, but the sound quality is very good. These things have excellent reviews on both Best Buy and Amazon. Logitech X-140 Speakers.

I mean they don't compare to my set of JBL bookshelf speakers, but they aren't bad.
 
They are lacking Bass, but the sound quality is very good. These things have excellent reviews on both Best Buy and Amazon. Logitech X-140 Speakers.

I mean they don't compare to my set of JBL bookshelf speakers, but they aren't bad.
Many many speakers and other equipment have excelent scores on sites, it does not really make it a good product, it only shows its user are not capablet of critical thinking or comparing to other products.
More complex topic creates less relevant user feedback.

BTW don't get any idea this is targeted at you or I am trying to insult you - it's just my observation :)
 
Back