A site called techspot says this"If MS had gone with 8 GB ram the hardware would be the same" WHAT??? Embarassing the ps4 has a considerable more powerfull GPU which is the bigger issue, faster ram is the least of x1's issues, faster ram doesn;t make much difference.
Also, when will people stop underestimating playstation?? WW it is dominant, even if Ms had a great launch, and hardware wise was on par ps4 would be winning, it is a stronger brand... Sony dominates Europe, Asia and emerging markets, MS as usual outside the US is weak....
Ps5 GPU, stronger brand are bigger issues not ram. Only reason 360 and ps3 were close was ms had a 1 year head start and sony launched at 600 bucks..
at least try reading the entire article. do you even know why the PS4 GPU is bigger? It's because of the 8GB of DDR3 RAM that the xbox one uses. More exactly the ESRAM that microsoft put in on the same APU die to increase the bandwidth since the DDR3 bandwidth would become a very big bottleneck. Sony doesn't need the ESRAM so they just used the extra space for a larger GPU.
So in theory, if MS had used GDDR5, the consoles would have similar power.
I read it did you???? The x1 still had kinect which drove the cost up 100 more...so even with GDDR5 there is no guarantee it would have had the better GPU as cost would go higher, in theory is right as this article is clearly talking out of there arse...MS tried to pull a DRM trojan horse and had features no one needs or wants, this is a much bigger issue then graphics power. That and Playstation keeps getting underestimnated by the ignorant american pres... News flash, head to head Playstation beats Xbox everytime Worldwide...It is just a bigger more popular brand. If not for the US xbox would have died years ago.
MS played there hand as to why they are really in the game market...and it backfired, no one wants that future...Sony stuck to gaming on a game console, go figure. MS wanted more power for app switching and multitasking, which are a waste of resources on what 90% of people buy a games console for, GAMING>
A Waste of resources? I'm guessing you dont own an Xbox One correct? I use those features every day, turning on my entire entertainment center, multitasking with party chat while playing a game, having the system record awesome moments by just telling it to. These are features that work and work very well WHILE you are gaming. Your friends jump on, its easy to just snap up the party chat and invite them in, all without leaving the game. I can zoom out to the dashboard and go watch a show on Netflix and then resume my game right where I left off. It works extremely well and the system was built and meant to do things this way and as a gamer, I really like what MS has done with the Xbox and their OS.
As far as sales go, both are selling way better than the previous generation, MS isnt doing bad at all really, Sony is just doing BETTER with the PS4. Shame though that even their amazing world wide sales cant bring the company to any profit, so how well is the PS4 actually doing when the entire company keeps posting major losses. MS is posting major gains almost every where in comparison and can put a lot more in the tank with their console.
Umm the market decides, and they clearly decided theyw ere a waste..people dont buy vonsoles for voice (Which Ps4 has but didnt force it through an over priced peripheral). Most other thigns PS4 can do, including many thigns better, where is MS share play? PS now? Still cannot even take screens shots with X1...Ps4 install times and instant play go....Xbox was designed around media, people buy game consoels for gaming features....You are the minoroty, the sales speak for themselves.
We live in an era phones, Smart tvs can do all that stuff, cramming it in one set top box was cool in the 90's.. MS is out of touch as usual. If not for windows monopoly they's be irrelevant decades ago.
Again, the market decides, and they decided.....what you think is irrelevant. No one buys a consoel for snap, ordering dominos, vocie commands.