I humbly disagree with regard to Fulvia, its a beautiful car, much better than charger ........ beside in most american cars if you try to go round a bend at higher speed you gonna hit a tree anyway (as Eric Banna found out while filming for his film 'Love the Beast'

).
First of all, I had nothing to do with nominating the Charger.
What I said was, that the Fulvia looked like a glorified, perhaps refined, Corvair, which to me it does. Some people never get my associations, but google "Corviar" and see what you think.
What the Corvair was, was Detroit's attempt at a Chevrolet Volkswagon. Tragically, it suffered from drastic oversteer at highway speeds, and being a flat motor (like a Volks), it had external pushrod covers sort of like a Harley Davidson, but the Harley motors hardly leaked at all by comparison. So, people were saddened by the fact the motor couldn't even be modded to power an experimental aircraft, which the Volkswagon mills will.
And last, American cars were never designed to go around corners in the first place. Banna should have known that. They were designed with soft suspensions so that when we hit a bump we wouldn't feel it. Our a**es were "smaller" back then, not the lavish 6 to 8 inches of cellulite we have on average today. And when I say "smaller" please note the quotation marks. Now the cars can be sold with a firmer ride since our a**es have gotten so big that we wouldn't feel it if someone hit us in one with a thrown brick. After all one of our bums now takes up 2 airplane seats.
The American automobile had a manifold design objective, (highlights to follow).
1. To have fins higher than last year's American car
2. To rust out in 5 years tops
3. To have a large enough back seat to accommodate a Roman orgy.
4. And last but not least, to be able to burn all the tread off the rear tires with one press of the accelerator.
Now I ask you, how would cornering ability factor into any of that?