The most productive workers "rest" almost two and a half hours during an 8-hour workday, study claims

midian182

Posts: 10,732   +142
Staff member
A hot potato: Many bosses espouse the belief that working non-stop for hours on end without a moment's break is the key to high productivity. But a new study disputes this claim. It found that the most productive staff work in shorter bursts and take longer breaks. It also suggests that in-office and hybrid work encourages a healthier work-life balance than fully remote models.

DeskTime, the cloud-based time tracking and productivity management software from the Draugiem Group, carried out the recent productivity study.

The main takeaway was that the most productive employees operate on a 75/33 work-to-rest ratio: work for 75 minutes then rest for 33 minutes. That means in an 8-hour workday, the workers need about two hours and twenty-seven minutes of rest to be at their most productive.

During the remote working years of the pandemic, the ratio was 112/26, meaning the most productive employees were working 1.5 times longer without breaks, which were 1.3 times shorter. It was also found that workers took roughly 3 breaks over an 8-hour workday while at home. Now, they take approximately 4 longer breaks.

In 2014, the figures were 52/17, or 118 minutes of rest in an 8-hour day.

DeskTime posits that in-office or hybrid work offers a better work-life balance than being fully remote. Being in an office can lead to more indirect breaks, such as interactions with other workers and movements to other areas of a building, as opposed to sitting in front of a screen at home by yourself, relentlessly hammering away at a keyboard.

DeskTime CEO Artis Rozentals said that people are more naturally prone to taking breaks in the office, and while they may seem unproductive at first, they're vital for mental rejuvenation and contribute to employee well-being.

"The hybrid model is the Goldilocks choice, as it best leverages both the in-office social dynamic and the deep focus afforded by remote work," Rozentals said.

DeskTime's study involved analyzing the software's top 10% of users, amounting to 6,000 people. These users had the highest percentage of time spent in applications considered productive for that particular employee.

While it's true that there have been studies showing employees can be less productive at home, other sources, including the workers themselves, disagree. It's also worth noting that work management software isn't always the best way of tracking productivity as it often cannot capture work-related tasks done outside of apps.

Permalink to story:

 
What a load of crap.

A worker's ability to perform well depends on the job and the person in question. I personally excel at jobs that have little customer service interaction (because I'm an *** to stupid people and I don't like to chitchat) and require higher physical and/or mental work loads. I don't like being at work with nothing to do.

It all varies from person to person.
 
I remember the office days. In Texas, our big office had a quiet dark room where you could go take a nap mid day.

Our company has always recognized mental health and physical well being is part of being a productive employee. I even negotiated an earlier start time to my day recently to accommodate DST when it was in effect so I could get my workouts in.

They know me being healthy is good for the company and were happy to oblige.

Its crazy some folks still think the whip cracking work ethic means hard work. Both of us benefit from a mutually friendly relationship.
 
"The main takeaway was that the most productive employees operate on a 75/33 work-to-rest ratio: work for 75 minutes then rest for 33 minutes. That means in an 8-hour workday, the workers need about two hours and twenty-seven minutes of rest to be at their most productive."

Not in US... In Australia perhaps...!
 
Positive way to look at it, so get paid to have more breaks?
More realistic way they'll expect you to take the optimal amount of breaks and clock them but not pay for them and want you to stay on premises so they can confirm you are actually doing nothing
 
Yea, I agree that we need to take breaks. I do a lot of critical thinking and sometimes I need to walk away to prevent myself from over thinking it.

Even in school, I have been taught when writing a paper you do your draft or whatever and come back to it later.

However, I still believe the main factor for employee productivity is employee morale.
 
Yea, I agree that we need to take breaks. I do a lot of critical thinking and sometimes I need to walk away to prevent myself from over thinking it.

Even in school, I have been taught when writing a paper you do your draft or whatever and come back to it later.

However, I still believe the main factor for employee productivity is employee morale.
When I have a very complex technical problem that has me stumped, I get to a point where I could spend 8 hours straight troubleshooting and not figure it out.

I stop. I go to bed. I wake up in the morning and within 5-10 minutes, the problem is solved. This has happened to me so much I have recognized the pattern.
 
When I have a very complex technical problem that has me stumped, I get to a point where I could spend 8 hours straight troubleshooting and not figure it out.

I stop. I go to bed. I wake up in the morning and within 5-10 minutes, the problem is solved. This has happened to me so much I have recognized the pattern.

100% this.

Taking a complete mental break from a problem and then coming back, I start from different perspective. Almost always the one that gets the problem fixed.
 
The 75/33 ratio makes a lot of sense when you think about how our brains work. We're not machines—we're more like sprinters than marathoners. Regular, deliberate breaks aren’t slacking off—they're maintenance.
 
I own my own low voltage security company, my employees get a 30 min break at 10, a 30 min break at lunch and a 30 min break at 230 and off at 5. Rarely Overtime unless they want it.

And yes, we pay them for it.
They are all productive and don't mess around, so while it isn't 2.5 hours, that 1.5 hour of rest they love and no one else in our industry does it with pay.

Happy employees means happy work environment. I do think 2.5 hours out of 8 is a bit much.
 
The honest truth is it has nothing to do with productivity, and everything to do with control. Some executives simply have no trust in their employees. Possibly because they know all the **** they pulled as they were climbing the ladder. That's why we have clear evidence that working from home being more productive being ignored by some companies. I guess the sadistic MFs want their employees to suffer?
 
DeskTime CEO Artis Rozentals said that people are more naturally prone to taking breaks in the office, and while they may seem unproductive at first, they're vital for mental rejuvenation and contribute to employee well-being.
Or they're just pretending to be productive when working remotely and they're mentally disconnected from work? That's what happened to me during Covid when I was shifted to remote only lol. Covid times is what the blog was comparing to for full remote work:
In the COVID-19 pandemic’s remote working years, the ratio was 112/26 – people worked 1.5x longer sprints and took 1.3x shorter breaks. The new data therefore suggests that in-office or hybrid work encourages a healthier work-life balance than fully remote work.
 
As I read these comments, I think of that Charlie Chaplin film in which he worked in a factory & was fed by one machine while putting parts in another. 🤪
 
It is always interesting to look at those researches and then getting understanding of work conditions in the US. Making me wonder if the slavery actually ever ended there. I remember going to a customer with colleague from US... he just started work and we told him to take some breaks or a few days of holidays to do some trips around Switzerland and enjoy the scenery. It was shocking when he told us he had only 5 days of holidays, 'but after 5 years I could get 15'. What was even more shocking, he said '5 days is too much, what would I do?'. (btw, he got a large (or like a full size) rental car because, you know, he likes large cars, but he couldn't drive swiss often narrow roads.... never before or after I heard so much scrapping noises and I was sorry for the car, really). It was surprising that he already got formatted enough to throw away his workers rights and become just obedient machine. How the families can normally function there if people can't have time for the closest ones? https://www.citizensinformation.ie/...s/hours-of-work/work-breaks-and-rest-periods/, and Ireland isn't even very good...

Anyway. Breaks are important, and even if I go for a coffee or read a book, after I'm back I usually have solution for my problem. It is bit different for physical work I presume, but even there you need to clear your mind to make less mistakes. I know I cant maintain my full focus for longer than 40 minutes and the linger I do that, the more break I need to attempt that again.
 
We already seen people ghosting their jobs or "quiet quitting". Even during Remote Work in the pandemic we literally saw people slacking off, sleeping, playing video games, having "intimacy", etc...

Some businesses get more productivity because they have you from sunup till sundown.

Other businesses and institutions need people to be there in person. We already know kids don't learn at home and we also know that mental health issues arise from the isolation.

The argument is over. These people mostly need to physically go to work.

Some businesses can handle the remote model, manage productivity and be profitable, but most others absolutely can't.

Furthermore: if your job can be done over the internet via computer, you are the most likely to lose your job to AI which could do your job 100 times over and run Crysis simultaneously.
 
Back