Trump is reportedly ignoring "inconvenient" security protocols relating to his iPhones

midian182

Posts: 10,653   +142
Staff member

Following reports that he was still using his old, unsecured Android handset after becoming president, the White House said Donald Trump finally switched to an iPhone last year. But according to Politico, Trump isn’t listening to his advisers when it comes to using mobile devices in a secure way.

Citing “two senior administration officials,” the publication writes that the president uses two iPhones—one for phone calls and the other for using Twitter and browsing a handful of news sites. The White House Information Technology and the White House Communications Agency issued both devices.

The report claims that Trump’s aides urge him to swap out the Twitter phone on a monthly basis, but he says this is “too inconvenient.” It’s now been five months since the device has been checked by security experts. Politico writes that President Obama had his handsets checked by staffers every 30 days.

It’s unknown how often the phone used for calls is changed, but a West Wing official said they “are seamlessly swapped out on a regular basis through routine support operations. Because of the security controls of the Twitter phone and the Twitter account, it does not necessitate regular change-out.”

It’s also reported that the phone used for calls still has its microphone and camera enabled—no word if the Twitter phone has the same functions—which may present a security risk. The GPS trackers on both devices, which could be used to track the president’s location, have been disabled.

As the report is based on the word of two anonymous sources, we can’t be certain that it's 100 percent accurate. Officials seem to be confirming some elements but downplaying the potential security risks they pose. You can read the full article here and decide for yourself.

Permalink to story.

 
Hilary had her OWN F**KING INSECURE SERVER AND MULTIPLE PERSONAL DEVICES

Tech-spot's political BIAS and lack of technical articles worth reading is driving me away
 
Hilary had her OWN F**KING INSECURE SERVER AND MULTIPLE PERSONAL DEVICES

Tech-spot's political BIAS and lack of technical articles worth reading is driving me away

lol it's like you were sitting around waiting for this article to post that all-caps rant.

IT Security surrounding the President of the US is pretty relevant to technology.

BUT BUT, HER EMAILS. Yeah, we've heard.
 
{bronx cheer} Just shows how ignorant/silly both of them are about tech. Powerful people have to have prerogatives.... {BAH!}

Since Politico is not known for sourcing from 'anonymous tipsters' right off the picket line there may be a real story here. Consider how important the President's twitters are and think about the impact of faked or hacked ones... or carrying a mic enabled cell in your pocket during a classified briefing. I mean, we ARE concerned about leaks and fakes, folks - no matter which side of the political spectrum.

ps: His desk looks almost as bad as mine.
 
29fd49dd183b7a4bbd235a514c608643--not-funny-funny-pics.jpg
 
{bronx cheer} Just shows how ignorant/silly both of them are about tech. Powerful people have to have prerogatives.... {BAH!}

Since Politico is not known for sourcing from 'anonymous tipsters' right off the picket line there may be a real story here. Consider how important the President's twitters are and think about the impact of faked or hacked ones... or carrying a mic enabled cell in your pocket during a classified briefing. I mean, we ARE concerned about leaks and fakes, folks - no matter which side of the political spectrum.

ps: His desk looks almost as bad as mine.

You check your phones in before classified meetings, they aren't even in the room.
 
Been there, done it myself. I also watched a 3 star admiral check in his phone along with staff before a meeting as well.
 
Hilary had her OWN F**KING INSECURE SERVER AND MULTIPLE PERSONAL DEVICES

Tech-spot's political BIAS and lack of technical articles worth reading is driving me away
Yes, Hillary probably authorized Trump's use of an insecure phone just so that he can blame it on her, and start yet another attempt to find something, anything, with which to charge her.
 
Hilary had her OWN F**KING INSECURE SERVER AND MULTIPLE PERSONAL DEVICES

Tech-spot's political BIAS and lack of technical articles worth reading is driving me away

Just like to point out, this was already investigated and cleared.

Either way, Politician X doesn't suddenly get a free pass because Politician Y is also potentially doing something illegal. You investigate both.

FYI an insecure phone is a hell lot worse than an email server. You can scrape a ton more data from a phone than you ever could from an email server. Heck, a phone is a walking talking listening device.

You would think people against hillary wouldn't want to compare Trump's security misnomers to his own though, as being "better" than "Crooked Hillary" was one of his rally cries. Should we also have Trump's breach of protocol with his phone investigated as well? After all, there is much more at stake for the President vs the Secretary of State.
 
Back