UN chief says fossil fuels are "incompatible with human survival" as world breaks temperature...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nuclear, clean coal & gas are better options.
Well you got one right. Although gas is not nearly as bad as "clean" coal. So 2.

And clean coal is mostly a contradiction in terms:

Its old but unfortunate facts sometimes never get through.
 
Last edited:
Burty117, thanks to the *****s on the planet who the media want to allow their right to be thick and say there are more than two genders on this nyah planet... I can be whatever I like and say No, I am a plant based kettle drum from a galaxy beyond. Climate change or lack of resources, its chicken or the egg, either way this little species of humanoids is heading for the town of "itsallfkadeefkd!" population "insert googles numbers now".

Would you go back in time and Kill Hitler to save all those lives ? hint you need a calcualtor.

It's not just about money, it's about easy money, capitalism is the most retarded concept. And that word is so apt, as it slows down the true potential. The quick buck. Systems already in place, no need to change. Hold on as long as you can to easy street, until they are forced to take a left onto, slightly inconvenient but just as profitable lane.
Canabis got kicked out of the states because the Timber companies got scared they were going to be sent down that lane. Lobbyists slow down progress. See.
tswc
 
So we hit 1.5 degrees over the pre-industrial average and not a lot happened - and lets face it we have less than 0.7 degrees over the 1979 average (since which the world has produced twice the CO2 cumulatively than the previous 220 years combined - 1173 Billion Tonnes v 563 Billion tonnes, and that was only up to year end 2021). Hence a doubling of CO2 produced has led to only an increase of 0.7 degrees - so it would take another doubling of CO2 emissions to then hit the old 2 degrees fear limit. Hmmm, not sure there really is an emergency......


Widespread fires in for examples forests tell a different story.

 
You deserve a cookie for this amazing scientific thesis!!
Thanks!! But the cookie would obviously be just cold mush, not being cooked with polluting power plants.

On the other hand obviously this is an attack on myself as a person and not the comment, which clearly is not a thesis. However I understand the diversity in humans and maybe you really don’t know the difference.

So either you are trolling or your educational basis is not to the standard of contributing. Either case, the comment is useless.
 
Burty117, thanks to the *****s on the planet who the media want to allow their right to be thick and say there are more than two genders on this nyah planet... I can be whatever I like and say No, I am a plant based kettle drum from a galaxy beyond. Climate change or lack of resources, its chicken or the egg, either way this little species of humanoids is heading for the town of "itsallfkadeefkd!" population "insert googles numbers now".

Would you go back in time and Kill Hitler to save all those lives ? hint you need a calcualtor.
ah uh... ah uh... ok ok soo... Where did he hurt you?

All jokes aside, why have you chosen Earth to live on if you came from a galaxy beyond? Did you guys destroy your planet as well? Or was it a cosmic shock like a black hole sucking your planet in or something?
 
Science is not a set of hand picked data points it's a Meta analysis of all data points on a macroeconomic scale. Fear mongering doesn't help anyone except those who are going to profit the most from the mass hysteria. FYI we aren't trolling we live here too! Lastly misinformation can be also be state sponsored. Pop quiz does anyone know what an E.S.G score is?
 
We need a forum that weeds out misinformation. Or is there a site I can get into that does that?
The problem is with some people, facts and evidence mean nothing. So those people, even when confronted with cold hard truth, will claim anything they have chosen to deny is misinformation.

I have good friends who were Trump voters, folks that think Reagan was "not all that bad" as President.

But those people are fully aware of the facts behind Climate Change. Their beef is with just how much humans have caused it. That, at least, is worthy of the time spent to debate.

But what we see here is ignorance of the very foundations of undeniable evidence.
Many are the true definition of the word knuckle dragger.

Sadly, those people are only 50% of the problem. The other 50% are the people that will never stop trying to convince us that we are doomed in 5 years. Its too late! The sky is falling!

Two opposite ends that meet to form a big pile of bullshit.
 
The problem is with some people, facts and evidence mean nothing. So those people, even when confronted with cold hard truth, will claim anything they have chosen to deny is misinformation.

I have good friends who were Trump voters, folks that think Reagan was "not all that bad" as President.

But those people are fully aware of the facts behind Climate Change. Their beef is with just how much humans have caused it. That, at least, is worthy of the time spent to debate.

But what we see here is ignorance of the very foundations of undeniable evidence.
Many are the true definition of the word knuckle dragger.

Sadly, those people are only 50% of the problem. The other 50% are the people that will never stop trying to convince us that we are doomed in 5 years. Its too late! The sky is falling!

Two opposite ends that meet to form a big pile of bullshit.
Let's not forget the misinformation from some politicians like AOC afew years back using children as props and going on social media rants saying the world will end in 12 years and what's the point of having kids. Also we have extremists eco fascists blocking traffic which adds to worse carbon emissions and desecrating art, lastly the ones with highest ESG score like Microsoft is number 1 FYI is also the highest polluters eg. where is the Xbox made. Also why are the 1% like Bill Gates flying in a Jet contributing the more pollution 1000 times Over than you and me are excempt and shrug off the question when asked by a reporter. Why isn't Geothermal and Nuclear energy being promoted? Why are we ignoring the waste from lithium batteries? Why are we ignoring the risks of mining that goes into precision elements that goes into EVs? Why are we ignoring Ch!na manufacturers 80% of solar panels? The solution shouldn't be worse than the problem via blind side of potential worse pollution, famine and poverty while making Bill games even more rich!
Update let's not forget the fires contributing to real deaths from E bikes are on the rise. Shhhh let's not talk about that it was in the bronx.
 
Last edited:
Let's not forget the misinformation from some politicians like AOC afew years back using children as props and going on social media rants saying the world will end in 12 years and what's the point of having kids. Also we have extremists eco fascists blocking traffic which adds to worse carbon emissions and desecrating art, lastly the ones with highest ESG score like Microsoft is number 1 FYI is also the highest polluters eg. where is the Xbox made. Also why are the 1% like Bill Gates flying in a Jet contributing the more pollution 1000 times Over than you and me are excempt and shrug off the question when asked by a reporter. Why isn't Geothermal and Nuclear energy being promoted? Why are we ignoring the waste from lithium batteries? Why are we ignoring the risks of mining that goes into precision elements that goes into EVs? Why are we ignoring Ch!na manufacturers 80% of solar panels? The solution shouldn't be worse than the problem via blind side of potential worse pollution, famine and poverty while making Bill games even more rich!
The least you can do when you rant so wildly off-topic is provide proof. I do all the time.
Or at least point out things like your claim about AOC, and how it is different from a politician posing with his whole family holding guns at Christmas.
How were they not "props"? And why is that A-Ok?

Overall though.

tswc
 
Last edited:
So we hit 1.5 degrees over the pre-industrial average and not a lot happened - and lets face it we have less than 0.7 degrees over the 1979 average (since which the world has produced twice the CO2 cumulatively than the previous 220 years combined - 1173 Billion Tonnes v 563 Billion tonnes, and that was only up to year end 2021). Hence a doubling of CO2 produced has led to only an increase of 0.7 degrees - so it would take another doubling of CO2 emissions to then hit the old 2 degrees fear limit. Hmmm, not sure there really is an emergency......
So much BS from you. All you have to do is look outside and see that everything has changed. Seasons are severely out of wack for over a decade now. In Europe I think this winter we had over 20 degrees C in mid December/January (when we should have had snow) and it was unusually cold mid freaking May. Slowly but surely the seasons have shifted a month or two and we have much more extreme weather patterns.

In Romania on the 2nd of Jan we've had the hottest January day ever recorded 21.3 C.

We don't need to "double" CO2 emissions. You also seem to have sever lack of understand how these numbers work and why they were set by scientists.

2 degrees ins't the "fear" limit. (the words used by you just shows that you are actually anti climate change) After a certain point a feedback loop starts where even if we lower emissions the damage is irreversible and will actually increase on its own.

You also don't seem to understand the timescale. We aren't talking about a 4-5 years. All climate change scientists talk about the effects by the end of the century. Short term variances happen with or without climate change, but long term effects are devastating and it can be measured.
 
Last edited:
The least you can do when you rant so wildly off-topic is provide proof. I do all the time.
Or at least point out things like your claim about AOC, and how it is different from a politician posing with his whole family holding guns at Christmas.
How were they not "props"? And why is that A-Ok?

Overall though.

tswc
I was more on topic than what you posted though. This morning another 4 people died from climate change I mean E bikes



AOC speech simple Google search for those lacking such skill

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York suggested this weekend that it may not be ethical to have children, given the difficulties that climate change will likely cause in the years to come. In a live stream on her Instagram, Ocasio suggested to her 2.5 million followers that the answer was not clear.Feb 25, 2019

questions?
 
Fossil fuels have been one of the largest factors in increasing human prosperity and standard of living. Life as we know it would not exist without the use of fossil fuels. That's a fact. Cheap energy has done more to drive people out of abject poverty than anything else.

I agree that we should invest in renewable energy sources but the vilification of fossil fuels is just a political ploy to gain more control. Climate change is real. The extent of it's negative effects are greatly exaggerated and the doomsday prognosticators never consider the mitigating benefits of warming such as decreased mortality from cold (cold still kills more people than heat), increased global greening of semi-arid regions, and increased agricultural activity in many regions.
 
I was more on topic than what you posted though. This morning another 4 people died from climate change I mean E bikes



AOC speech simple Google search for those lacking such skill

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York suggested this weekend that it may not be ethical to have children, given the difficulties that climate change will likely cause in the years to come. In a live stream on her Instagram, Ocasio suggested to her 2.5 million followers that the answer was not clear.Feb 25, 2019

questions?
Just one. Do you realize how easily I drew you out? Just by asking a simple specific.

So you go on record that AOC exploited unborn kids. Kids that do not exist. Ghost kids.
You still haven't addressed my comment about the tRUMPer that exploited his family in their Christmas photo. And his family actually exists.

And let me tell you now pal, I will put lung and respiratory related deaths against the number of people that died because of faulty e-bikes all freaking day for God’s sake.

What a collection of conflicting impulses.

I agree that we should invest in renewable energy sources but the vilification of fossil fuels is just a political ploy to gain more control.
Wrong. It's a plan to start creating cleaner air and water. To save lives.
Polluting filth is the most effective and ruthless serial killer the world has ever seen.
 
Last edited:
Florida was supposed to be underwater 20 years ago, mass starvation and widespread thirst.

None of that happened.

Now we have these jokers using the same language,t he same doomday screaming, all while enjoying their multi million dollar beachfront properties taking private flights to discuss what is good for us, the peasants.

Why does anyone take these jokers seriously?

I think you should leave your village sometime and visit Miami during even a small tropical depression. It IS underwater!!

Just because your favorite Faux outlet is scared to report that, it doesn't mean it's not happening.
Same applies to many turbo-charged natural events, from universal droughts to new weekly records for heat.
Yeah man, science sucks to the oblivious crowd..
 
Just one. Do you realize how easily I drew you out? Just by asking a simple specific.

So you go on record that AOC exploited unborn kids. Kids that do not exist. Ghost kids.
You still haven't addressed my comment about the tRUMPer that exploited his family in their Christmas photo. And his family actually exists.

And let me tell you now pal, I will put lung and respiratory related deaths against the number of people that died because of faulty e-bikes all freaking day for God’s sake.

What a mass of conflicting impulses.


Wrong. It's a plan to start creating cleaner air and water. To save lives.
Polluting filth is the most effective and ruthless serial killer the world has ever seen.
Majority of those deaths are outside the western hemisphere though. Can we do better? Sure? But not blindly as some want. Imagine assuming every critic is a climate denier, while some want a better world but not at the cost of poverty, more waste, and famine. You said tell someone who cares but you do care hence why you back for more!
 
Let's do something else, for example take care of the garbage we produce, with most advanced recycling available to every nation on earth. Half the world drops garbage outside their house if you can call those houses.
By the time and if they can get out of poverty, they will live on layers upon layers of garbage. There will be historical garbage layers with each layer explaining what resources people used and what was popular.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back