pcaceit said:
WRONG WRONG WRONG
Actually am very Qualified in these matters (Dont like to be Vain)
so wont quote any letters after my name or etc...
At least I have no illusions about my vanity. I don't think you have any letters after your name. If you do, they should be forcibly taken away.
pcaceit said:
so at sub atomic level are none of the particles solid?
That is correct. They are not solid in the way you think of things as solid. They do not behave like, say, marbles or ball bearings.
pcaceit said:
so you would suggest that even the tiniest known particle is also made up of some similar scheme like the Atoms of which they are a part of! and infinitely reccuring for all particles of particles of particles of particles..............................
No, I wouldn't suggest that. I'm not saying there aren't infinite layers of sub-particles, but I don't think there are.
pcaceit said:
and all of these held together by force only?
Yes. Forces are the ONLY things that hold ANYTHING together. If this doesn't seem obvious to you, then your idea of what "force" is flat-out wrong.
pcaceit said:
and none of these sub particles ever actually physically in contact at all levels, so therefore force increases exponentially as thing get smaller? which it would have to for anything to actually hold its form, so are you saying that there are even more significantly energetic reaction than Nuclear Fusion and Fision? so are the models of atomic structure apply to infinity because nothing is ever truly solid or in contact with anything else???
Like I said before, the 1/r^2 dependence of many forces (electric field, magnetic field, gravity) is accurate on the macroscopic scale. On the atomic scale, things do not have a well-defined position, and do not therefore have a well-defined distance from each other. The 1/r^2 approximation does not work well on this scale.
pcaceit said:
If you have a formula or explaination of how this all works then i will hail you with much respect.......
i * h * derivative(Psi(x,t),t) = -h^2 / (2m) * derivative(Psi(x,t),x,x) + V(x) * Psi
where
Psi(x,t) = the wave function, a function of position and time
i = the square root of (-1)
h = hbar, a universal constant
m = the mass of the particle
V = the potential, a function of space
derivative(a,b) = the derivative of a with respect to b
derivative(a,b,b) = the second derivative of a with respect to b
That's the one-dimensional time-dependent Schrodinger wave equation. It's an empirical formula, but basically all of quantum mechanics is derived from it. Just solve that equation for Psi for a given potential V(x), then normalize Psi. Psi^2 gives you the probability density of the particle as a function of space and time. The 3-dimensional Schrodinger equation is even more complicated.