I'm planning to upgrade a load of stuff at the end of this month, CPU, mem etc..
I want to know which CPU to buy out of the three below (*RETAIL* inc AMD h/s/f).
The XP 2000+ is obviously the cheapest - £74.26
and the XP 2100+ is only slightly more - £82.50
but the XP 2200+ is £138
I've heard that the XP 2100+ is really bad at overclocking...so should I go for the 2000+, the 2100+ one, or should I splash out for the XP 2200+?
I don't plan to be watercooling or fiddling much with the cpu...but a bit more extra power (i.e. overclocking) for no extra £ would be good.
What do you think?
(BTW - I plan to be running this on a Asus A7V-333 viaKT333 + USB2 + ATA133 ...is that a good choice to go with the above? I know KT400 sucks at the moment)
I want to know which CPU to buy out of the three below (*RETAIL* inc AMD h/s/f).
The XP 2000+ is obviously the cheapest - £74.26
and the XP 2100+ is only slightly more - £82.50
but the XP 2200+ is £138
I've heard that the XP 2100+ is really bad at overclocking...so should I go for the 2000+, the 2100+ one, or should I splash out for the XP 2200+?
I don't plan to be watercooling or fiddling much with the cpu...but a bit more extra power (i.e. overclocking) for no extra £ would be good.
What do you think?
(BTW - I plan to be running this on a Asus A7V-333 viaKT333 + USB2 + ATA133 ...is that a good choice to go with the above? I know KT400 sucks at the moment)