TechSpot en EspañolMost Popular
| Top Stories | Just in | Featured |
11 awesome applications you've never heard of featured
Microsoft to offer three-user Windows 7 Family Pack?
USB 3.0-equipped PCs due before end of the year
Apple issues advice on iPhone 3GS overheating
Firefox 3.5 breaks 5 million downloads in 24 hours
Fallout 3 gets 50% price cut on Steam this weekend
TechSpot RSSInformation Technology
Former TorrentSpy collaborator turns to MPAA
Wired has posted an interesting story about a hacker named Robert Anderson, in which he gives details about his association with the MPAA and how the powerful media organization promised him money and power in exchange for providing confidential information about BitTorrent site TorrentSpy.
According to Anderson, he began working with the MPAA in 2005 after a failed business venture with TorrentSpy founder Justin Bunnell. He offered to set up an anti-piracy marketing campaign for the MPAA, and received $15,000 from them in exchange of information about TorrentSpy, which included everything from bank records to passwords and the source code for the site.
The information provided by Anderson was eventually used to bring a copyright infringement suit against TorrentSpy, who in turn sued the MPAA under the federal Wiretap Act. The MPAA does not dispute it paid Anderson for the sensitive information, but claims that the information obtained from third-parties is only taken into consideration if it was collected by legal means – though clearly that was not the case here. You can read the complete story over at Wired.
According to Anderson, he began working with the MPAA in 2005 after a failed business venture with TorrentSpy founder Justin Bunnell. He offered to set up an anti-piracy marketing campaign for the MPAA, and received $15,000 from them in exchange of information about TorrentSpy, which included everything from bank records to passwords and the source code for the site.
The information provided by Anderson was eventually used to bring a copyright infringement suit against TorrentSpy, who in turn sued the MPAA under the federal Wiretap Act. The MPAA does not dispute it paid Anderson for the sensitive information, but claims that the information obtained from third-parties is only taken into consideration if it was collected by legal means – though clearly that was not the case here. You can read the complete story over at Wired.
User Comments (2)
Post a comment| phantasm66 on October 22, 2007 3:47 PM | Everyone has a price, I suppose.
Mine is just a lot higher than $15,000.
|
| Julio on October 22, 2007 3:57 PM | Who knows what was going through Anderson's head at the time but he was played in such an obvious way. I agree with Phant that for starters, $15,000 proves how he was blatantly downplayed by the MPAA.
|
