Most Popular
| Top Stories | Commented | Featured |
ATI Radeon HD 5570 Review featured
TechSpot's PC Buying Guide: Always up to date! featured
Weekend tech reading: Microsoft to patch 17-year-old bug
Microsoft axes Xbox Live for first-gen consoles, games
Steam weekend sale: Far Cry Complete for $14.99
Windows 7 overtakes Vista among enthusiasts, plus other interesting trends
Microsoft rumored to showcase Windows Mobile 7 next week with Zune-like interface
TS Community
| User Gallery | Recent Discussion |
This Is Counter Strike by BlindObject | I Found a Useful Paperweight! by Obi-Wan Jerkobi |
pc powered home theatre by vega | Techspot Contest by AbsolutGaloot |
Hardware
OCZ launches high-capacity 3.5" Colossus SSDs
OCZ expanded their lineup of high-capacity SSDs today, officially launching the 3.5" Colossus line. Starting at 128GB, the Colossus also offers sizes of 256GB, 512GB and a massive 1TB of space. The drives feature a maximum read and write speed of 260MB/s, a sustained write speed of 220MB/s, and a max IOPS (4k file size, random write) of 14,000.
The drive makes use of MLC flash, which is undoubtedly in the interest of cost. This compares to the company's Vertex SSD series, which includes drives that use the more expensive (but more reliable) SLC flash. OCZ pitches it as a solution for desktops and workstations that require a performance boost.
For the most part, SSDs have only come in 2.5" or 1.8" varieties. That has made a lot of sense for a while, as the biggest early market for SSDs is laptops, where those sizes are standard. As more people want to use SSDs for desktop use as well, it makes sense for manufacturers to take advantage of the more common 3.5” bays inside desktop chassis.

Whether or not that the 3.5" size has contributed to the Colossus capacity and performance specs isn't mentioned. One other interesting note is OCZ's mention of wear-leveling. OCZ made it a point to indicate the actual available space on the drive will be less than what is on the label, due to upwards of 5% of the drive capacity being reserved for wear-leveling purposes.
If these drives sound awesome, it's because they are -- and OCZ knows it. While the 3.5" form factor might make it easier on desktop users, the price probably won't. The 1TB Colossus was supposed to ship last month for $2,500, and 250GB drive is listed on Amazon for $1,122.99.
The drive makes use of MLC flash, which is undoubtedly in the interest of cost. This compares to the company's Vertex SSD series, which includes drives that use the more expensive (but more reliable) SLC flash. OCZ pitches it as a solution for desktops and workstations that require a performance boost.
For the most part, SSDs have only come in 2.5" or 1.8" varieties. That has made a lot of sense for a while, as the biggest early market for SSDs is laptops, where those sizes are standard. As more people want to use SSDs for desktop use as well, it makes sense for manufacturers to take advantage of the more common 3.5” bays inside desktop chassis.

Whether or not that the 3.5" size has contributed to the Colossus capacity and performance specs isn't mentioned. One other interesting note is OCZ's mention of wear-leveling. OCZ made it a point to indicate the actual available space on the drive will be less than what is on the label, due to upwards of 5% of the drive capacity being reserved for wear-leveling purposes.
If these drives sound awesome, it's because they are -- and OCZ knows it. While the 3.5" form factor might make it easier on desktop users, the price probably won't. The 1TB Colossus was supposed to ship last month for $2,500, and 250GB drive is listed on Amazon for $1,122.99.
User Comments (4)
Post a comment| Rick on November 18, 2009 11:15 AM | There's no way -- even with tons of money -- that I would pay +$1100 for an *MLC* flash drive. Especially if I were going to fill it up. They have nearly 1/10th of the life span and they are substantially slower (although guess still an improvement over mechnical drives in most respects). |
| tekkaraiden on November 18, 2009 11:59 AM | Well the price isn't dropping the the capacity is getting bigger. Still can't justify spending the cost of my computer for a single part. |
| green98ls on November 18, 2009 12:13 PM | These companies should focus on making SSD cheaper rather then bigger. It'd be nice to have a $100 SSD for just a boot/system drive. I don't need a 500gb SSD to store files on |
| Timonius on November 18, 2009 4:36 PM | I agree that the prices need to come down (and they will), but the main concern is the lifespan as Rick mentioned. |
TechSpot RSS



