Sign up for a new account or log in here:
Investigations by Russian antivirus firm Dr. Web have concluded that more than 600,000 Mac computers are currently infected by the new strain of Flashback Trojan, with a massive 56.6% of the total infected machines believed to be in the US alone. Apple released an update earlier this week to patch vulnerabilities in Java that could be exploited to run malicious code in a victim's computer, including the newest strain written of the Trojan in question, but this will only protect those that are not already compromised by the malware.
Dr. Web revealed on their website yesterday morning that the Flashback botnet was some 550,000 strong. Later that day, malware analyst Sorokin Ivan revised that figure to more than 600,000 on Twitter.

According to Dr. Web, the US has the most infections with 56.6% of the total infected with the BackDoor.Flashback.39 malware. Of the 300,000 plus infected machines, the Russian antivirus firm also revealed 274 were from Cupertino. Canada had the second highest infection rate with 19.8%, the UK has 12.8% and in fourth place with 6.1% of the total number of infected machines in Australia.
Internet security firm F-Secure has published detailed instructions on how to verify and remove the Trojan should your Mac computer already be infected. Interestingly, they state that the malware can infect a computer even without administrative permissions. "Whether or not the user inputs the administrator password, the malware will attempt to infect the system, though entering the password will affect how the infection is done."
The initial route to infection follows the same path. First the user visits a website which has been infected with the Flashback malware. Upon loading the infected webpage the script is executed, and it then immediately checks for the presence of several antivirus products. Should the presence of any be detected, the script then deletes itself and takes no further action.
If it doesn’t find anything, the malware then connects to a specified URL and downloads the payload. It then proceeds to install this payload, and infects the Mac computer. It appears to do this in one of two separate ways, dependent on whether you give administrative permissions.
.
For those that refuse to grant them, the malware searches for Microsoft Office 2008, 2011 and Word applications, as well as for Skype. If it fails to find these it then creates several files in the userspace area and creates a launch point in the "~/.MacOSX/environment.plist" location of the Mac user’s home folder.
Those that grant administrative permission will find the infection follows another pathway, creating several files inside Safari’s "/Applications/Safari.app/Contents/Resources" folder, and the creation of a launch point in "/Applications/Safari.app/Contents/Info.plist" to start the malware when Safari is run.
Another note of particular interest is the way the code has been written. It appears to take complete advantage of the average Mac users’ notion that their computer can’t get infected and therefore doesn’t need an antivirus product installed. Those using certain internet security products will therefore not have been infected but it appears to have been written to specifically target those that don't have any installed.
It's also important to note that the installation of the latest security patches from Apple is not enough to resolve the issue for those already infected. Many are now questioning whether Apple could have done more to prevent infections on such a massive scale, especially since Oracle had patches available back in February, but Apple took almost two months longer to release them on their platform.
MilwaukeeMike - For now, it apparently is just checking in with botnet servers. I presume that it could so something malicious in the future, like use all the infected comps to attack a website. I haven't heard about it gathering data sniffing for passwords or anything, but I suppose that is a possibility too.
As I mentioned above (in response to the contents of the article) this thing doesn't attempt to install itself anymore once it discovers if you have any AV (or in the second instance if you have word, office, skype). It actually goes so far as to remove itself if it finds those. It is actively doing this.. for what reason? I don't know that answer, and why those apps? Wouldn't put it past some security consultant to have created this for one or more AV producers for Macs. I'm not saying thats the case, esp by backing out (if you didn't give it your password) when it sees word, office or skype. But it is odd.
I can only but speculate as to why that is, maybe it only wants to spread among the ignorant! lol
I don't believe that the case is that it backs out when it sees those MS products, rather that the torjan tries to install itself in any of those locations.
No that is false. It modifies /Applications/Safari.app/Contents/Info.plist and creates ~/.MacOSX/environment DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES.
If you are going to disagree with an idea, then you should explain why you disagree.
It is "trojan" not "torjan" anyway.
Can't believe people still believe these things (I use a mac) are impervious to viruses/trojans. In fact, I'm a bit surprised that only 600,000 machines have been infected, given the care-free attitude most Mac users have about security.
Well call me an ***** but I have no antivirus. What I have is several cisco routers ah asa 5010 appliance. Let me see 20 bucks on ebay. You can have an enterprise set up for couple of hundreds. Who thought inflation was such a blessing.
Of course the US would have the highest percentage
Because Apple products sell highest in the US. Apple doesn't even rank in the top 25 worldwide.
You know how I know you don't know anything about statistics?
I see thousands of Apple followers with Dawson crying faces right about now.
Only one thing worse than the apple fanbois... and that's the windows fanbois who desperately want every other OS to be as full of holes as their malware sponge of choice...
You are hiding behind a guest account because you don't want to make these comments as a registered user.
Regardless, Mac's still fair multitudes better in this regard mainly due to four related factors:
1. Less proliferation
2. Higher price of entry
3. Quality control
4. More locked down
As OS X transitions to the iOS way of doing things, 3 and 4 will become the prominent factors for it's superiority in regards to infection.
Well, I suppose I should have said, "almost nobody"... ![]()
(*) Add "itinerant guest trolls at Techspot", to that elite.
Woohoo, lets skip ahead another 13 months.
Wouldn't normally reply to this. But, I have seen CC bump 2 threads in the last 3? days just to revisit an argument that had died months before. One was odd, 2 seems really odd, is this going to be a trend CC? I enjoy your comments even if I don't agree, but bringing back dead threads is a bit much.
Since I'm apparently notorious for looking for an argument, (although personally I don't believe a word of that), in my own defense, I can usually find enough contention in the present to satisfy my need to vent.
But WTF, I suppose I'll just plead insanity...:oops: That's the best excuse I can come up with, since I don't have a cell phone or Nvidia Shield game to blame for "distracted posting".
Then there's the conditioned response I have to many guest posts. It's like waving a red cape in front of a bull.
Edit: Whew, I'm glad I got this up before you locked the thread! That "art film" was taking forever to download... ![]()
OMG Cap, you are hilarious! Nobody can say, you don't have a sense of humor. ![]()
Are you sure you don't want a nVidia Shield or iPhone?
Are you sure you don't want a nVidia Shield or iPhone?
OTOH, if the iPhone comes with a pair of barely legal redheads who are willing to engage in a game of "hide the telephone, and let me call you", then I'm "all in". (So to speak)...
| Trending | Featured |
Get free exclusive content, learn about new features and breaking tech news.