A radio-wave trick from the 1980s could keep fusion reactors running continuously

zohaibahd

Posts: 1,022   +21
Staff
Why it matters: A fusion power plant only makes sense if it can run for days on end, much like the coal and gas plants it would replace. Most tokamaks, however, still work in bursts, because the giant magnet coil driving their plasma current eventually has to stop and reset. Physicists in San Diego have now shown that radio waves can carry some of that load instead, using a trick that every experiment in the 1980s failed to pull off.

The coil in question, a central solenoid, works a lot like a transformer. It keeps ramping up its own current to induce one in the plasma, but it eventually runs out of room to ramp. Those stop-start cycles also wear on the machine over time, so engineers would much rather run a reactor in steady state.

The new method, called helicon current drive, gets around that by beaming 476 MHz radio waves into the plasma, where they nudge electrons along and keep current flowing without the coil's help. Bob Pinsker, a General Atomics physicist on the new paper, was among those who tried it back then. He told the American Nuclear Society that the theory predicted a very weak effect in '80s-era plasmas, so researchers were "kind of hoping for a miracle."

That miracle never showed up, so the idea sat on the shelf for decades. These days, though, DIII-D can produce plasmas that come fairly close to reactor conditions. On top of that, General Atomics built a "comb-line" antenna with 30 radiating elements, more than twice as many as earlier tokamak antennas carried, to launch the waves more efficiently.

The team has now published the results in Physical Review Letters. In each test, the antenna coupled roughly 370 kW into the plasma for a full second. That was enough to drive around 20 kA of current near the core. Comparison shots using microwave heating of similar strength showed no such effect, so heat alone doesn't explain it.

Even so, the plasmas in these tests carried around 1 MA of current in total, so the helicons supplied only about 2% of it. Realistically, then, helicons won't let anyone retire the coil anytime soon. Instead, they could become one of several current drive tools a future reactor uses at once. That matters because every watt a plant spends keeping its current going is a watt it can't sell to the grid.

Meanwhile, China's EAST, which held a plasma for a record 1,066 seconds last year, and France's WEST already sidestep the coil on long runs using lower hybrid waves. But those waves struggle in dense plasma, so in a power plant they'd mostly be useful near the edge. Helicon waves aren't expected to hit that density wall at all.

Permalink to story:

 
So your solution is to make it harder to solve.. sounds like Big Oil. Maybe it cannot innovate, but it can vastly speed up human development. If you are against that you should stop taking vaccines right now.
There’s already SPARC, ARC and ITER in the process of being built to prove viability
 
I'm 62 and I've been hearing every year since the 1960s that fusion power is just around the corner and I'm certain those same words will continue to be spoken for the next 62 years. Projects such as fusion power are government driven meaning they're simply projects designed to enrich politicians and the companies they own at the taxpayers' expense.

"A radio-wave trick from the 1980s could keep fusion reactors running continuously." Yeah, and a working time machine could take me back to the 1980s. Wake me up when we actually have a fusion reactor that works. Until then, stop wasting my time with absurd stories like this one.
 
I'm certain those same words will continue to be spoken for the next 62 years.
Are you a physicist? Engineer? How are you so certain? Oh, and there are many privately funded fusion reactors in existence now. As a matter of fact, private investment in fusion has reached an all-time high.
Until then, stop wasting my time with absurd stories like this one.
The only person wasting your time is you. No one forced you to read this article.
 
Tokamak are a dead-end, Stellarators are a much better technology on size, cost, operational stability. AI has made massive strides in taming the complex magnetic geometries and stabilising them. They are making a very big comeback now.
 
Back