A retailer sold iPad Airs for $17, now it wants them back

midian182

Posts: 11,624   +176
Staff member
A hot potato: Imagine you spotted a 13-inch iPad Air on a popular retail site for just $17, bought it, and then the company demanded you hand it back or pay almost the full price. It's the situation a European electronics chain's loyalty cardholders find themselves in, and they're not happy about it.

On November 8, loyalty card holders were likely delighted to see a deal appear on the website of Italian retailer MediaWorld: a 13-inch iPad Air for 15 euros (about $17) instead of the usual €879 (about $1,012).

Wired reports that the offer was snapped up by several customers. Some chose delivery while others opted to pick up the device in store to ensure there were no issues and, presumably, it hadn't been a mistake. The orders went through, and the customers likely thought they'd snagged the early Black Friday deal of the century.

But the elation turned to anger 11 days later when MediaWorld contacted the buyers via email. The company claimed the iPad price was "clearly incorrect."

The buyers were given two options: they could either keep the iPad and pay the difference, though they would be given a €150 ($173) discount; or they could return the tablet free of charge to get their €15 back along with a €20 ($23) discount voucher for their troubles.

While many companies have clear disclaimers about pricing errors in their terms and conditions, those that MediaWorld attached to the iPad orders made no mention of such a clause.

MediaWorld told Wired that its pricing had been due to a "clearly recognizable technical error."

Regarding its attempts to recover the iPads or make the customers pay close to the full amount, a spokesperson said, "By virtue of the provisions of the current regulations, we found it necessary to intervene, resorting to a legal principle aimed at preserving the contractual balance in the event of an error of this magnitude."

MediaWorld also highlighted that the customers were receiving discounts whether they decided to keep the iPads or send them back.

It appears that Italian law is on the side of the company in this situation. Article 1428 of the Italian Civil Code states that a contract can be annulled if one party entered into it because of a mistake, but only when that mistake was essential – meaning it directly influenced their decision to agree – and recognizable by the other party, who should have noticed it through normal diligence.

But consumer lawyer Massimiliano Dona argues that as the email in which MediaWorld made its demands doesn't qualify as a formal warning. Sent by regular mail and framed as a simple "choose one" proposal, it carries no legal force on its own. If recipients ignore it, MediaWorld would then have to decide whether to pursue formal legal action.

The bigger question, Dona adds, is whether MediaWorld actually has a solid legal basis for such action. To void a contract in Italy, the retailer must prove that the buyer knowingly took advantage of a pricing error. And a 98% discount, while dramatic, isn't automatically proof of consumer bad faith. With today's landscape of flash sales, app-only deals, social-media promos, and the chaos of Black Friday pricing, Dona argues it's plausible that a customer might assume the price was just an aggressive marketing tactic rather than a mistake.

The crux of the issue is the buyer's ability to recognize that the price was incorrect. We'll have to wait and see if any customers decide to fight for their $17 iPad Air.

In 2019, Amazon accidentally sold Canon EF 800mm f/5.6L IS USM Super Telephoto Lens for Canon Digital SLR Cameras for $94, which was 99.3% less than its usual $13,000 price.

Permalink to story:

 
Looks like Italian lawyers are up to no good there, as is their crooked law.

In any civilized country there would be fat chance of any return in this situation.

Say, you buy a product at a great discount, then sell it to somebody else at a profit, and spend the money on something else, which is very normal. So, you have no product and no money left. Now the original seller tells you to get their product back or pay the full price. It is the buyer's right to tell the seller to screw off. Anything else is 100% illegal, I don't care if lawyers pull a rabbit out of their behind to prove otherwise, it is a travesty of law.

Demanding money from a customer to cover their own screw-up is an extortion, and can never be legal. If Italians manage it differently, they are a bunch of criminals then.
 
Last edited:
If it was “clearly incorrect”, the employees could have stopped it from being sold.

Transaction completed in good faith (e.g., not working with employees to defraud company) is done.

Now you have a dollar amount to connect to the bad business procedures that got you here in the first place. I.e., good learning opportunity for the company!
 
snatch-brad-pitt.jpg
 
Looks like Italian lawyers are up to no good there, as is their crooked law.

In any civilized country there would be fat chance of any return in this situation.

Say, you buy a product at a great discount, then sell it to somebody else at a profit, and spend the money on something else, which is very normal. So, you have no product and no money left. Now the original seller tells you to get their product back or pay the full price. It is the buyer's right to tell the seller to screw off. Anything else is 100% illegal, I don't care if lawyers pull a rabbit out of their behind to prove otherwise, it is a travesty of law.

Demanding money from a customer for their own screw-up is an extortion, and can never be legal. If Italians manage it differently, they are a bunch of criminals then.
I guess you never owned a business.
 
The article is missing crucial context. How many people in total took advantage and actually received these ipads?

I would argue that unless the number is well above 50 then it would be actually a good marketing move to turn this mishap into profit by letting them keep it and advertising themselves as true to their word. This would win over more customers and increase web traffic.Thus at least partially offsetting the loss.

Trying to litigate every single one could end up costing way more than the actual loss because lawyers are far more expensive than a 1000€ ipad.

What's bizarre is that no one at the store noticed. Usually these kinds of unbelievable deals are not even shipped as the retailer pretty quickly catches the error before actually shipping the product.

I guess in the BF madness they overlooked this.
 
Yet I can still understand that random, big losses like this don't help a company.
Well, perhaps these massive corporations should take a little more care in their dealing, and some financial pain from their ignorance will help persuade them.

You cant expect anyone to learn while shielding them from mistakes.
 
I’m not versed on EU law, but in the USA, fat chance there chuckles. Frankly, the nerve of this company to put their obvious error on others is an asinine abuse. I hope those customers are not subject to a law that requires them to prove anything. Under no circumstances should customers obey this nonsense.

MediaWorld should do their job right the first time instead of blaming their customers.
 
It's one thing to quickly see the error and put a statement on the website that the price is in error and won't honour the deal, but to have actually sold it at the ridiculous price and then demand back the product several days later, is outrageous and I'm certain would be illegal in Australia.
 
Sure it's a technical error and someone feels bad they didn't do their job properly, but the bad press and bad customer relations are really not worth it for such a small loss that wouldn't even appear as a rounding error in their $22 billion annual sales.
 
The legal cost for MediaWorld in fighting this in court would be more than the iPads are worth at retail and with the snails pace of the Italian legal system would take years. Not a single employee questioned the price either.
 
Yet I can still understand that random, big losses like this don't help a company.

totally irrelevant, I love US law on this, the marked price is the price you must sell it at unless you wish to sell lower. Say you see a TV priced at $99, you grab it at the store and go up front and they say oh the 2 must have fallen off because its $299, well you can go back to the display if the sign over the TV's says $99 and there isn't another price label on the shelf itself or on the backside, and the only visible price is the $99 then by law they must sell the TV at $99, stores do lose money on this all the time, but the onus for accurate prices is on them not the consumer. If Italian or EU law is different, well all I can say is that is incredibly backwards on the EU's part to not have basic consumer protection laws to prevent a clear bait and switch.
 
You learn by what you hear and what you don't hear.
Has anyone ever heard of consumers returning something that wasn't defective at the request of the seller?
So why would you start now with a couple laptops?
 
What are the necessary components of a contract in Italy?

Offer, acceptance, consideration, where I am from. If it's something similar to that effect there shouldn't it a done deal for he seller?
 
The retailer will just need to write it off as a loss. It is not their customers fault they made a mistake, customers bought the product in good faith.

Imagine if those iPad Airs were full price and a customer bought one but the customer claims the box contained an old kindle instead of an iPad Air. Imagine how much trouble the customer would have trying to get a replacement or a refund from the vendor.
 
Back