A single entity often controls more than half of all Bitcoin mining

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,289   +192
Staff member

user controls bitcoin mining- security risk

Bitcoin has reached yet another milestone. Unfortunately, it's one that could pose a major security risk. Researchers from Cornell University have discovered that for the first time in the cryptocurrency’s five-year history, a single entity has – on multiple occasions – been responsible for more than half of the total computational power required to mine new coins.

That entity is GHash, a mining pool that (correctly, it would seem) claims to be the “#1 Crytpo & Bitcoin Mining Pool.” Despite the fact that GHash is comprised of multiple individuals, it’s still a single entity controlled by whoever is in charge of the GHash pool.

Why the big deal, you ask?

As noted in a report from Ars Technica, a 51 percenter has tremendous power over the market. For example, they could spend the same coins twice, reject mining transactions from competing pools or even extort higher fees from those with large holdings. Taking it a step further, GHash could launch a DDoS attack against the entire Bitcoin network.

The good news is that GHash has only maintained majority control of mining for up to 12 hours at a time.

All of this comes just months after GHash promised not to cross the 51 percent threshold, a move they said would undermine their investment.

Interestingly enough, Cryptocoin News points out that the mining pool recently went offline and suggests that it may have been the victim of a DDoS attack in response to the 51 percent news. As of writing, however, their site appears to be completely functional.

Permalink to story.

 
It does seem entirely not in their interest to mess with the market in this way. If it came out that they had control over the market the value of bitcoins would crash tremendously and their investments would be worthless.
 
It is not a currency, it is an investment in the ethereal or tulips
 
I saw an article several days ago claiming that over one petahash/s controlled "bitfury" was pulled from Gigahash.io to prevent future problems. (http://www.coindesk.com/bitfury-pulls-power-ghash-community-uproar/) And the blockchain shows gh.io at 33% right now which is a far cry from a majority. Im more terrified that bitfury as a company proved it has a minimum of 1.5 Ph/s because they aren't an aggregate of hundreds of thousands of miners like most large pools but a single entity someone can control.
 
I saw an article several days ago claiming that over one petahash/s controlled "bitfury" was pulled from Gigahash.io to prevent future problems. (http://www.coindesk.com/bitfury-pulls-power-ghash-community-uproar/) And the blockchain shows gh.io at 33% right now which is a far cry from a majority. Im more terrified that bitfury as a company proved it has a minimum of 1.5 Ph/s because they aren't an aggregate of hundreds of thousands of miners like most large pools but a single entity someone can control.
They said they will move additional petahashes as well so going by that they have a HUGE amount of mining power. If that one move dropped GHash about 15% or so and Bitfury can move even more they are a powerhouse considering the second highest pool controls 11% of the mining.
 
Back