AI boom drives SK Hynix to pay $477,000 bonus per employee

DragonSlayer101

Posts: 956   +13
Staff
The big picture: Buoyed by the windfall profits generated by the AI boom, South Korean chipmaker SK Hynix is reportedly planning to pay hefty performance bonuses to its staff, averaging around 700 million won (about $477,000) per employee. With the AI chip supercycle expected to continue well into 2027 and beyond, those bonuses could rise to roughly $900,000 next year.

After removing its previous bonus cap last September, SK Hynix is set to pay out 10% of its annual operating profits to employees as performance-based bonuses this year. With memory prices at record highs, analysts predict the company will generate about 250 trillion won ($169 billion) in operating profit, putting the bonus pool at an estimated 25 trillion won ($16.9 billion), according to Korea JoongAng Daily.

The money will reportedly be distributed among roughly 35,000 employees, with each worker expected to receive an average of $477,000. This comes on top of the 140 million won (about $95,000) in profit-sharing bonuses the company has already paid to each employee on average earlier this year. If profits continue to rise, each SK Hynix employee could receive nearly $900,000 in performance-based bonuses next year.

The news about SK Hynix's plans is creating ripples at another major South Korean chipmaker, Samsung. According to reports, the company's employee union is demanding 15% of operating profits as bonuses this year, while management is only willing to offer 10%, matching SK Hynix's plan. If the union has its way, the company's 77,000-strong workforce would receive a combined 29.8 trillion won ($20.2 billion) in bonuses, amounting to around 580 million won (about $396,000) per employee.

Curiously, the bonus payout plans are facing significant pushback online, with some South Koreans calling for the money to be shared with the public instead. On social media and online forums, many argue that the windfall profits were made possible by state support, and that the gains should therefore be shared with citizens. These comments refer to the 20 trillion won ($13.6 billion) in low-interest loans and tax credits the companies received from the government and state-run banks in 2024.

One commenter on the South Korean workplace forum Blind argued that SK Hynix would likely have collapsed without the infusion of taxpayer money, and that the company should reward its benefactors by sharing its profits. Another Blind user, claiming to be an employee of the state-run financial institution Credit Guarantee Foundation, suggested that the bonuses be distributed in local currency vouchers to boost domestic consumption.

Permalink to story:

 
I think the more interesting metric would be the median payout to the 35k employees. The average I can imagine, like here in the US, is heavily skewed by absurd levels of executive's bonus compensation.

I don't think I see executives excluded from this - so 35k people averaging $477k bonuses. I laugh imagining this breaking down to 34k underlings taking home $1000 each and 1k exec's receiving $16.6 million between them lol. I wonder how far off I am
 
Employee profit sharing is nice.

Noteworthy no one suggests employee loss sharing. That’s the entrepreneur risk v reward that people forget when times are good.

There were 40 RAM manufacturers in the 80s. 12 in 2000. It’s a difficult industry to survive.

Except somehow ‘entrepreneurs’ who lose massive amounts of money always seem to be doing just fine. It’s the former employees of the companies getting bankrupted that tend to get ****ed. Not the former owners. Either they’re so wealthy the losses don’t lead to significant lifestyle changes, or they have their companies split into so many separate entities that they manage to compartmentalise losses and still pay themselves big while losing money overall.

Mom and pop shops sometimes see significant consequences… the ‘entrepreneurial’ class… somewhat more seldomly…
 
Each employee gets $477K...and how much goes back to the government in the form of income taxes or what not?
 
I think the more interesting metric would be the median payout to the 35k employees. The average I can imagine, like here in the US, is heavily skewed by absurd levels of executive's bonus compensation.

I don't think I see executives excluded from this - so 35k people averaging $477k bonuses. I laugh imagining this breaking down to 34k underlings taking home $1000 each and 1k exec's receiving $16.6 million between them lol. I wonder how far off I am

This
 
Except somehow ‘entrepreneurs’ who lose massive amounts of money always seem to be doing just fine. It’s the former employees of the companies getting bankrupted that tend to get ****ed. Not the former owners. Either they’re so wealthy the losses don’t lead to significant lifestyle changes, or they have their companies split into so many separate entities that they manage to compartmentalise losses and still pay themselves big while losing money overall.

Mom and pop shops sometimes see significant consequences… the ‘entrepreneurial’ class… somewhat more seldomly…
You are conflating entrepreneurs with uber rich a holes.

An entrepreneur is a person who organizes, launches, and operates a business venture, assuming the financial risk in pursuit of profit. Mostly small business owners that sometimes become big businesses and on extremely extremely rare occasions become big enough that you have heard of the business.

The wealthiest 0.001% aren't entrepreneurs. They're investors. The fund entrepreneurs ideas and take a lion share of the profit. When the lose they get politicians to bail them out. It's the golden rule. He who has the gold makes the rules. Those people are terrible but let's be clear about who they are.

For example Kevin O'Leary. The I'm smarter than everyone Shark Tank host and most importantly accredited investor. He had significant funds at Silicon Valley Bank because it was doing sketching financing of startups he was involved in when it collapsed in 2023. He was very vocal in the media about wanting depositors made whole beyond the standard $250,000 FDIC limit. The federal government ultimately did guarantee all SVB deposits. Kevin should have lost his money. Or given up his ability to be an accredited investor. Neither happened. He's a bad person.
 
You are conflating entrepreneurs with uber rich a holes.

SK Hynix is owned by SK Group.
"In 1998, Sunkyoung Group was renamed SK Group, along with most of its subsidiaries. That same year, Choi Tae-won took over the group, but by the early 2000s, he and several other senior management members were indicted on charges of financial fraud, specifically inflating profits."
And there are a lot of people working at SK Group.
It's a bit more complicated.
 
Last edited:
If a company, any company make big profits, they are a decent company too if they share some of those profits with staff as bonuses. Additionally good performers deserve bonuses as well, not just the CEO. Of course repeat underperformers need to be sacked, but a good case has to be made.

This story is likely to make the typical middle manager or lower working in the USA, or for a USA company rant and rage with envy!

In the USA, with some exceptions, the CEO, and possibly the CFO, and other very senior people keep it all to themselves.

Heck American companies care so little about their employees that they don't even get proper health insurance, a mininum of 20 working day paid holiday per year. Plus it's easy to sack someone for any reason. Job security? Doesn't exist except for the priveliged few.

The only 1st world country that treats it's employees as disposable non-humans.

Fair is fair, work hard, get a bonus. Mess up bad, fair enough - fired. Good CEOs are valuable so multi million dollar packages are to be expected.

But that argument becomes laughable when considereing Sataya, the a**hole CEO of MicroSlop. (Oh wait, I forgot about the shareholders - silly me coming from a consumer perspective.)
 
SK Hynix is owned by SK Group.
"In 1998, Sunkyoung Group was renamed SK Group, along with most of its subsidiaries. That same year, Choi Tae-won took over the group, but by the early 2000s, he and several other senior management members were indicted on charges of financial fraud, specifically inflating profits."
And there are a lot of people working at SK Group.
It's a bit more complicated.
The sum of humanity more complicated than I can cover in a single comment - of course.

As an entrepreneur myself, I can't abide the broad strokes of all are rich evil people that must be thrown out or worse based on a simplified communism they learned online or worse from university. That's what I was addressing.

But yes some execs commit fraud. Most are just people doing there best.
 
Don't you just love corporate welfare, and then get the third degree when you are bankrupted by medical bills or can't find a job to pay education loans?
 
Employee profit sharing is nice.

Noteworthy no one suggests employee loss sharing. That’s the entrepreneur risk v reward that people forget when times are good.

There were 40 RAM manufacturers in the 80s. 12 in 2000. It’s a difficult industry to survive.
Loss sharing is called layoffs. Though in modern times we have layoffs for no good reason anyways.
 
Loss sharing is called layoffs. Though in modern times we have layoffs for no good reason anyways.
That's not the same as taking money from the employees to pay for the loss.

Obviously this should not happen to employees but that's the deal. If you want to show up, make widgets, go home, and get paid regardless of how things are going, you don't get to complain about being fired or not getting excess profits.

If you want to avoid layoffs and get excess profits, start a business. It's hard (though easier than ever before), but that's how you get ahead. Being a cog in the machine and complaining about it is not.
 
That's not the same as taking money from the employees to pay for the loss.

Obviously this should not happen to employees but that's the deal. If you want to show up, make widgets, go home, and get paid regardless of how things are going, you don't get to complain about being fired or not getting excess profits.

If you want to avoid layoffs and get excess profits, start a business. It's hard (though easier than ever before), but that's how you get ahead. Being a cog in the machine and complaining about it is not.
Or we can change the laws to make profit sharing more equitable for everyone.
 
Why? Where would the incentive for starting / owning a business be if you knew you would have to share most of your profits?
It's not like small businesses are these great dragons of industry hoarding all the wealth, so no, the laws of relevance here aren't really applicable to them. A fair minimum wage is what is required. A more general law that says the highest paid employee should make say 20x or less the lowest paid employee would go a long way to bringing equitable pay. Employees are the reason businesses have profits in the first place, and someone else's employees are the reason the business has any customers. It benefits society and business to ensure they are all paid fairly.

If a business requires hoarding all the profits for an elite few to justify its existence, it's doing more harm than good.
 
It's not like small businesses are these great dragons of industry hoarding all the wealth
No one is "hoarding" wealth. Stop using 19th century cliches. And actually in the US, small businesses constitute about 45% of total GDP.

A fair minimum wage is what is required.
As Nobel-prize winning economist Milton Friedman says, minimum-wage regulations are one of the clearest examples of a government regulation having the exact opposite effect as that which is intended.

No business will hire a worker unless that worker's labor can generate more profit for them than what the worker costs them. And thanks to ill-advised government regulations, the cost of a worker to a business is, depending on city and state, two or even three times higher what the worker's actually paid.

...A more general law that says the highest paid employee should make say 20x or less the lowest paid employee would go a long way to bringing equitable pay.
A nation called the USSR tried that ... you might want to look up how that worked out for them.
 
Back