AI firms are quietly buying and destroying millions of printed books to train their models

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,042   +59
Staff
What we know so far: A market built for libraries and booksellers is now feeding AI training, as companies seek large volumes of printed books that predate the generative AI boom. ISBNdb, which says it maintains the world's largest book database, now helps AI companies source physical books in bulk. The company says it can coordinate purchases ranging from 1,000 to 1 million books, drawing from secondary markets where libraries, retailers, and individuals sell used inventory.

Its pitch is simple: older books offer cleaner data. "The world's best AI training data is sitting on a shelf," the company says on its website. "Books represent curated, peer-reviewed, domain-specific human knowledge, structured in a way no web crawl can replicate. Dense, edited, authoritative."

The focus is largely on books published before 2022, before synthetic text became widespread online. That matters because AI models trained on AI-generated content can degrade over time, a problem often referred to as model collapse. ISBNdb frames print as a way around that risk. "Print books from the pre-LLM era are structurally guaranteed to be free of this contamination," the company says. "Physical books published before this date [pre-2022] are structurally clean of modern poisoning tools."

To make that usable at scale, ISBNdb combines its catalog with sourcing services that help buyers avoid duplicate titles and assemble large, varied datasets. It also emphasizes confidentiality. The site says every engagement is covered by a strict nondisclosure agreement and that the buyer's identity, strategy, and acquisition targets are kept confidential.

That lack of transparency carries over into the marketplaces supplying the books. Sellers on platforms like Alibris and Biblio say they have seen a sharp increase in bulk orders in recent months, though the buyers are not identified.

One bookseller who specializes in foreign-language titles said sales changed dramatically starting in April. "I personally have mixed feelings about all of this," the seller told 404 Media. "It benefits me financially as well as by clearing out old inventory that is otherwise unlikely to sell. I've been well-suited for these sales with inventory from overseas and foreign language books. On the other hand, I don't like the end-use, and I don't like that uncommon books are being pulped."

The orders themselves stand out. Instead of focusing on a subject area, they appear scattered across topics and formats. The seller said the orders were unusual not just because of their size, but because they seemed random and ignored normal pricing patterns. The seller also suggested that the pattern looked like AI-related purchasing because of the scale of spending.

Other sellers are seeing similar patterns. On an Alibris forum, one user asked, "Is it just me, or has there been an uptick in the number of AutoBuy orders since the tail end of last year?" Mike Feldman, director of client services at Alibris, replied, "We have a couple of new bulk buyers that are scooping up trade books so lots of sellers are getting lots of orders."

There is no direct confirmation that these purchases are tied to specific AI companies, but recent court cases show how printed books are being used. In a lawsuit involving Anthropic, internal documents described a plan to buy and scan millions of books. In many cases, the books were destroyed during the process.

That approach relies on high-speed destructive scanning, where the spine is cut and pages are fed into machines. It is faster and cheaper than scanning intact books. One vendor mentioned in the case, Datamation Information Services, offers both destructive and non-destructive options.

A federal judge later ruled that Anthropic's process qualified as fair use. "Here, every purchased print copy was copied in order to save storage space and to enable searchability as a digital copy," Judge William Alsup wrote. "The print original was destroyed. One replaced the other. And, there is no evidence that the new, digital copy was shown, shared, or sold outside the company." He called the use "clearly transformative."

ISBNdb points to that reasoning in its own materials. The company says buying paper books in bulk from the secondary market does not deprive creators of income, because the books have already been sold once.

It also acknowledges the optics. "'AI company destroys two million books' is not a headline that generates sympathy." In another section, it adds, "Responsible physical sourcing is not book burning. It is the completion of a book's lifecycle: from tree to knowledge to tree again."

Neither ISBNdb nor Anthropic responded to requests for comment.

For AI developers, print offers a cleaner, more controlled source of training data. For sellers, the surge in demand is moving inventory that might otherwise sit for years. What remains unclear is how many rare or low-circulation books could be lost through destructive scanning.

Permalink to story:

 
One day I decided that books on the shelf that I have read are little more than a "look what I have done" statement so I got rid of 98% of them. If people want to cherish books because they are bound books that's a mistake. Books have been supplanted by e-books just like we went from the sharp stick, to the quill to the ball point. I don't care that the books are being destroyed as long as the data they hold is preserved. The only thing I wonder about is if the data will be accessible in the near future. Where is that floppy with "Road Hog" on it? Even if I find it will it be easily playable? BTW time to stop using that aging, worn out, overused phrase "quietly".
 
Everyone buys books quietly, I don't remember ever observing someone making loud noise while buying a book. That's actually valid for most things - unless you buy a musical instrument or an alarm system, chances are it happens quietly.

I'm not sure why this story has to be recycled again and again, but it's a good opportunity to express our gratitude to all the companies that digitize books not yet available in digital form. One physical copy turns into an unlimited amount of digital copies, which is fantastic!
 
Everyone buys books quietly, I don't remember ever observing someone making loud noise while buying a book. That's actually valid for most things - unless you buy a musical instrument or an alarm system, chances are it happens quietly.
Hahaha fair enough ! x)
 
Ebooks may be more convenient but companies like Amazon have a reputation for deleting books you own and paid for, or editing content to appease people who like censorship. Mega corporations can't take away your physical books, except I suppose when AI datacenters want to destroy them all for data harvesting. I guess ruining clean water and air wasn't enough.
 
I'm not sure why this story has to be recycled again and again, but it's a good opportunity to express our gratitude to all the companies that digitize books not yet available in digital form. One physical copy turns into an unlimited amount of digital copies, which is fantastic!

You do realise that these books are not being digitised for you to read online in whole, freely available by the human race right?
They are being destroyed to feed the AI machine, never to exist physically again, never available for another human to pick up, flick through physical pages in joy, never available to be passed down or onto another person to enjoy, for the book to be preserved. It's history lost forever.
Without tangible physical proof of what a book's contents contained, how are you to really know what's fact and what's make believe?
AI makes shed load of errors already, do you trust that the book it might one day allow to you access is complete in full without error, without being changed for political or social reasons?
Anthropic, Chatgpt etc are certainly not digitising these books for the sake of being sold on Amazon as an ebook.
 
For my part, the destruction of books is a painful sight. The public thinks of libraries as hallowed archives but, unfortunately, many old volumes, ironically better than the modern junk, go for pulping.

Digitisation is not a bad thing, but to destroy books in the process is not right, particularly old rare volumes.
 
You do realise that these books are not being digitised for you to read online in whole, freely available by the human race right?
They are being destroyed to feed the AI machine, never to exist physically again, never available for another human to pick up, flick through physical pages in joy, never available to be passed down or onto another person to enjoy, for the book to be preserved. It's history lost forever.
Without tangible physical proof of what a book's contents contained, how are you to really know what's fact and what's make believe?
AI makes shed load of errors already, do you trust that the book it might one day allow to you access is complete in full without error, without being changed for political or social reasons?
Anthropic, Chatgpt etc are certainly not digitising these books for the sake of being sold on Amazon as an ebook.
Calm down.

They are destroying a single copy of a physical book not wiping it from existence.

(Note the destruction is only for legal proof that they’re not reusing after training or reselling it.)
 
Calm down.

They are destroying a single copy of a physical book not wiping it from existence.

(Note the destruction is only for legal proof that they’re not reusing after training or reselling it.)
Tell me how destroying a book isn't wiping it from existence? Of course it is. That physical copy of the book is gone forever.
Note: Where is destruction of the book required for "proof"? Also who cares if they resell it? That's a far better option!
 
Calm down.

They are destroying a single copy of a physical book not wiping it from existence.

(Note the destruction is only for legal proof that they’re not reusing after training or reselling it.)
Why destroy the book though?

Donate to charity, library, I dunno, something. It seems wasteful to burn them when they have practical use.

Pretty sure you can resell a used book without any legal issues so I dont really understand the "reselling it" clause you put in there. Am I missing something?

You can literally resell anything you want that you purchased.
 
They are being destroyed to feed the AI machine, never to exist physically again, never available for another human to pick up, flick through physical pages in joy, never available to be passed down or onto another person to enjoy, for the book to be preserved. It's history lost forever.
I laughed so hard reading this ridiculous sloganeering
🤣🤣🤣
Don't you think the lousy AI that concocted it needs to be improved a lot?
It definitely does, and that's one of the reasons to have these books digitized - otherwise you'll keep posting such things.
 
One day I decided that books on the shelf that I have read are little more than a "look what I have done" statement so I got rid of 98% of them. If people want to cherish books because they are bound books that's a mistake. Books have been supplanted by e-books just like we went from the sharp stick, to the quill to the ball point. I don't care that the books are being destroyed as long as the data they hold is preserved. The only thing I wonder about is if the data will be accessible in the near future. Where is that floppy with "Road Hog" on it? Even if I find it will it be easily playable? BTW time to stop using that aging, worn out, overused phrase "quietly".

And how do you know the data being preserved hasn't been altered? THINK.
 
Back