Amazon's new nuclear plant in the Pacific Northwest will generate 3x more power than planned

DragonSlayer101

Posts: 953   +13
Staff
Looking ahead: The AI boom is quickly creating an energy crisis. There is simply not enough electric power to sustain growth while still keeping the lights on for everybody else - not to mention the increased pollution from coal-powered plants. Amazon aims solve the problem by investing in nuclear power.

Amazon has announced that its upcoming modular nuclear plant in Washington state will generate three times as much electricity as initially proposed. The Cascade Advanced Energy Facility will provide clean power for the retail giant's Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centers and generative AI clusters, whose power requirements are growing exponentially.

Amazon plans to build the power plant in a joint effort with Energy Northwest near the latter's Columbia Generating Station in Richland, Washington. Columbia is the region's only existing nuclear power plant and has a nameplate capacity of 1,216 megawatts. Amazon says the Cascade project will create more than 1,000 temporary construction jobs and over 100 permanent positions.

Cascade's construction will consist of three phases, each generating 320 megawatts of electricity from four next-generation 80-megawatt high-temperature gas-cooled reactors. Once the entire plant is operational, the 12 reactors will produce up to 960 megawatts of electricity. The project will begin "by the end of this decade," with electricity generation expected "in the 2030s."

Energy Northwest is designing the facility based on small modular reactor (SMR) technology to enable faster deployment and reduce construction costs. Its overall footprint will reportedly be equal to a few city blocks - significantly smaller than traditional nuclear reactors, which can take up more than a square mile of land to generate a similar amount of power.

Amazon also sought to address concerns raised by environmentalists, academics, and native American tribes, who accuse the company of trivializing safety and environmental concerns. According to the company, the scalable, clean, and reliable nuclear power will help reduce carbon emissions, generate jobs, and contribute to the local economy while protecting the region's ecology.

With the increasing power appetite of AI models, Amazon last year invested in an SMR development startup called X-Energy with the intention of building its own power plant to fuel its AI clusters. The company believes reactors developed by X-Energy will help add more than 5 GW of clean electricity to the US grid by 2039 - enough to power 3.8 million US homes.

Amazon and X-energy also signed an agreement in August 2025 with two South Korean power utilities - Doosan Enerbility and Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Company - to deploy more SMRs in the US. Amazon inked an additional deal with Talen Energy in Pennsylvania to build a data center next to the latter's existing nuclear plants for easy access to carbon-free energy.

Permalink to story:

 
I'm guessing it will also cost 3 x more because IIRC that is pretty common for nuclear plants.
That and that the slooow construction are the big negatives IMO.

Doesn't mean I'm against it. I simply don't know enough to suggest a valid alternative.
 
Amazon doing what the US government and most state governments just refuse to do: build actual useful clean energy.
I'm guessing it will also cost 3 x more because IIRC that is pretty common for nuclear plants.
That and that the slooow construction are the big negatives IMO.

Doesn't mean I'm against it. I simply don't know enough to suggest a valid alternative.
Most of that comes from our unwillingness to invest in nuclear, thus creating a shortage of expertise and construction equipment for nuke plants, thus making the systems more expensive.

That and lawsuits. SO many lawsuits.
It's funny how anti-nukes people were until rich people wanted them.
Oh there's still plenty of environmental groups that will fight this tooth and nail, and communities that will wail about Chernobyl. It's just drowned out in the media by Capitan Cheeto news because outrage culture is all the media has left.
 
Nuclear should be nationwide...if it wasn't for Chernobyl (completely DIFFERENT kind of reactor which the west never used because it was dangerous), Three Mile Island, which proved even with the failures that happened, the safety features prevented a complete meltdown, the the silly movie "The China Syndrome". With that, the anti everything crowd along with the media, killed off nuclear power in the United States. Now, with the rise of EV's, banning gas stoves & other appliances, more things run on electricity and the grid can't handle the load.
We are going to be like North Korea one of these days if they keep up with it!
 
Nuclear should be nationwide...if it wasn't for Chernobyl (completely DIFFERENT kind of reactor which the west never used because it was dangerous), Three Mile Island, which proved even with the failures that happened, the safety features prevented a complete meltdown, the the silly movie "The China Syndrome". With that, the anti everything crowd along with the media, killed off nuclear power in the United States. Now, with the rise of EV's, banning gas stoves & other appliances, more things run on electricity and the grid can't handle the load.
We are going to be like North Korea one of these days if they keep up with it!
There was a huge power outage last year where I live. Some cities did not have power up to 7 days.
Having at least natural gas to cook food would be nice in situations like that. We do not need green power, we need power that does not all come from the same source.
 
There was a huge power outage last year where I live. Some cities did not have power up to 7 days.
Having at least natural gas to cook food would be nice in situations like that. We do not need green power, we need power that does not all come from the same source.
It doesnt matter if your power is made from solar, nuclear, or coal, if the grid goes down due to external factors you're not going to have power either way.
Will also generate 3x times the BOOM!
No.
 
It doesnt matter if your power is made from solar, nuclear, or coal, if the grid goes down due to external factors you're not going to have power either way.
No.
Solar panels would make a difference. But I am speaking more about different sources in general. Like natural gas for example. Removing it removes the ability to have basic necessities for people when natural and unnatural disasters strike.
It is good to have various sources of energy spread out for safety.
 
I am speaking more about different sources in general. Like natural gas for example. Removing it removes the ability to have basic necessities for people when natural and unnatural disasters strike.
It is good to have various sources of energy spread out for safety.
I can only second that.
 
Amazon doing what the US government and most state governments just refuse to do: build actual useful clean energy.

Most of that comes from our unwillingness to invest in nuclear, thus creating a shortage of expertise and construction equipment for nuke plants, thus making the systems more expensive.

That and lawsuits. SO many lawsuits.
Oh there's still plenty of environmental groups that will fight this tooth and nail, and communities that will wail about Chernobyl. It's just drowned out in the media by Capitan Cheeto news because outrage culture is all the media has left.
Nuclear energy is neither cheap, nor clean. The decommissioning costs are eye-watering.
Anyway...The AI bubble will have burst before it comes online, leaving the taxpayer with the cleanup costs.
 
Solar panels would make a difference. But I am speaking more about different sources in general. Like natural gas for example. Removing it removes the ability to have basic necessities for people when natural and unnatural disasters strike.
It is good to have various sources of energy spread out for safety.
As someone who literally builds infrastructure all over the US like this, your natural gas will only last so long in a power outage if you have it. The generators that are installed in natural gas plants that pressurize the "gas grid," for lack of a better term, are only there to power essential safety features and services. The plant that pressurizes your natural gas lines also relies on the grid. If the grid is out then your gas lines are only going to remain pressurized for about 2 days, tops. Gas stations? They rely on the grid to pump gas into your car. This is actually part of the reason I want to have an EV as I can charge it off the solar on my RV in a power outage

I have 800 watts of solar on my RV and no generator. I can(and have) run my fridge and microwave off of my RV for a few days during a poweroutage. I do highly recommend that people have a couple solar panels laying around and sometype of battery backup for "just in case" scenarios. They've started building datacenters in my area of Pennsylvania and power outages are a lot more frequent ever since then. That's on top of the cost of electric nearly doubling. Things go on basically as normal with just that 800 watts of solar plugged into my houses breaker box. No AC and the server rack has to be shut down, but we still can watch TV, use our laptops and charge our phones just fine. Connectivity is a separate issue, it all depends on whether the ISPs or cell towers have power. I have never seen both go out so it's really just one or the other in a power outage

On a slightly similar note, you'd be surprised how little power you actually need if you turn off the AC. Solar is pretty cheap these days, having a "solar generator" is actually a decent investment. I'd argue that more so if you live in an area prone to frequent power outages. We get outages lasting5-10 minutes probably once a month, but we get bigger ones lasting 2-3 days during storm season. It's wild, I don't remember storms like this growing up in Pittsburgh. I remember 1 in the 90's and then after 2018ish we started getting wild thunder storms in the middle of summer. I remember watching storms on the porch with my mom growing up and not being worried about it. These days, I often see storms where I say "hey, we should go inside, this is getting kinda wild." Keep in mind, I'm 20 minutes outside of Pittsburgh, we typically don't get bad storms but we had 7 tornadoes this year. Tornadoes used to be so infrequent here that they made the news if we got one. I remember 3 between 1990 and 2015. The last 5-6 years we get multiple every summer. They say our mountains are supposed to disrupt wind currents making it difficult for tornadoes to form, but I guess they've been pretty determined to form in-spite of our mountains
 
Last edited:
Not sure I have a dog in the fight for or against nuclear energy.

What I do know is that Amazon isn’t a trustworthy or responsible company, generally.

Any corporation running a nuclear power plant, that treats people the way Amazon does, cannot be a good thing in the end.
 
Amazon doing what the US government and most state governments just refuse to do: build actual useful clean energy.

Most of that comes from our unwillingness to invest in nuclear, thus creating a shortage of expertise and construction equipment for nuke plants, thus making the systems more expensive.
I'm not a US citizen (I would be if I could but...different storyline) but live in the EU. I'm under the véry strong impression that on my side of the watery thingy it's the companies that build the plants are the ones that make the costs triple during construction.
Same result though. Slow going and super expensive.
 
Amazon.
Nuclear Power Plant.

Those are words I never expected to be in the same sentence.

Nvidia Nuclear Power.
Google Nuclear Power.
Tesla Nuclear Power.
Apple Nuclear Power.

If all the trillion dollar companies decide to become Nuclear power plant operators, we're gonna end up with Weyland Yutani.
 
Oh there's still plenty of environmental groups that will fight this tooth and nail, and communities that will wail about Chernobyl. It's just drowned out in the media by Capitan Cheeto news because outrage culture is all the media has left.
Yes, but the media is now silent on nukes since AI became a thing.

Formerly the left media was all for shutting down nukes in Europe (which sometimes happened) to go 100% "green".

The difference is stark.
 
Funny, how the ones who push for green energy, are actually the ones without resources, like oil and gas... Usa having a lot of resources, it's a myth... They always imported huge quantities from Canada and UAE, for many decades.
 
No one cuts through environmental safety policies quite like a billionaire CEO with an army of lobbyists. Apparently nuclear was dangerous because the checks weren't fat enough, but now that hurdle has been lifted.
 
3 words.

We are fu#$ed!


Was strolling through my local supermarket and realised, when were shops allowed to sell their own brands. I thought 🤔 this is what's seriously fu#$ing up businesses everywhere. Look, competition is good, innovation is good but monopolisation is really fu#$ing bad! On so many levels it pushes competition and innovation out.

When I shop I don't wanna buy supermarket branded sh#$ where other products exist that are superior in most ways. These businesses that branch out into other areas don't care about quality just profits... And this pisses me off!

Amazons' over reach comes into question - Critical industry should remain independent to other industry; eg energy production, telecommunications, medical services, teleportation, etc shouldn't be something to acquire or run by a company that runs retail or digital services. Regulation isn't a requirement it's a fu#$ing right within itself!
 
Last edited:
I lived in UK both before and after the important infrastructure like electricity production, telecoms, rail transport, water supply, postal service, etc. was "privatised" by the Thatcher witch. She sold it off to get the Conservative government out of debt. The result? A lot of the money raised went into the pockets of the rich, and the cost of all those services increased to the general public. The revenue went mostly into the pockets of investors and very little went into maintenance and improvements that would aid future capacity. The more you depend on commercial entities to supply the needs of the citizens the less you get for your money. Their first priority is profit.
 
I trust Google about as far as I can throw them! They, (Goggle) have proven time and time again they cannot be trusted. Google, is NOT your friend!!
 
I'm guessing it will also cost 3 x more because IIRC that is pretty common for nuclear plants.
That and that the slooow construction are the big negatives IMO.

Doesn't mean I'm against it. I simply don't know enough to suggest a valid alternative.

That's where flux capacitors come in...
 
Back