1. TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users. Ask a question and give support. Join the community here.
    TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users.
    Ask a question and give support.
    Join the community here, it only takes a minute.
    Dismiss Notice

AMD CEO Lisa Su on early strategy, lessons learned at IBM

By Shawn Knight · 12 replies
Jun 18, 2019
Post New Reply
  1. In a recent phone interview with Barron’s, Su said that one of her main goals when taking over as CEO was to “focus on the right things.” She believed high-performance computing was a great market that was only going to become more important moving forward, so they focused on it.

    Also instrumental to success in tech, she said, is to make bets far out in time.

    "The decisions that we made in that 2015 to 2016 timeframe were very important technology bets that are now playing out in the roadmap in 2018 and 2019. It’s things like betting on 7-nanometer technology and being early in that, really investing in our core IP and our core foundation."

    Equally as important was deciding on what not to invest in. Su said there were plenty of areas they thought were interesting but wouldn’t make or break them so they decided not to pursue them.

    Su is well aware of AMD’s up and down history but said she has always been attracted to solving really tough problems and if we’re being frank, AMD was in a tough position when she took over. The company had long lost its place in the fight against Intel and the outlook looked grim.

    As a young engineer at IBM, one piece of advice Su picked up was to run towards problems because “problems actually create opportunities.”

    “When you look at the opportunity that we have in the markets that we serve and the customers that we’re partnered with, there’s no better opportunity in the semiconductor industry,” she added.

    Permalink to story.

  2. MikitaM

    MikitaM TS Rookie

    Deeply respect Lisa. We were really loosing AMD as a high tech company, which would had led to sad consequences for all us pc enthusiasts. Glad she found her way to save it. Of course, it involved many hard choices, and she had to cut many corners, but the whole picture in 2019 is a ton better than it was in 2014.
    MaitieS, Mike Gray, Dosahka and 5 others like this.
  3. wiyosaya

    wiyosaya TS Evangelist Posts: 3,993   +2,290

    IMO, Lisa Su is a brilliant woman in technology and business. Making her CEO has got to be one of the best decisions AMD has ever made.

    Thank you Ms. Su for bringing competition back to the CPU market place! I, for one, look forward to the day that AMD GPUs compete in the gaming market. For now, though, GPU competition in the HPC market will have to do.
    Mike Gray, Dosahka, Clynt and 3 others like this.
  4. toooooot

    toooooot TS Evangelist Posts: 820   +403

    I am glad to see what she and AMD have done lately. There is no better way to measure their product success than watching people ditch their mid level Intel platforms for cheaper priced AMD builds.
    Dosahka, Clynt, pencea and 3 others like this.
  5. quadibloc

    quadibloc TS Booster Posts: 84   +53

    Wanting to know more about her, a few days ago I looked at the article about her on Wikipedia. It seems that she was working on the Ryzen project at AMD before she became CEO. As well, at IBM, she was working on the IBM/SONY CELL processor, an innovative design, if not successful in the market.
    MikitaM, Dosahka, Clynt and 1 other person like this.
  6. R00sT3R

    R00sT3R TS Guru Posts: 161   +342

    You also got lucky, Lisa. Intel screwing up an entire process node was not something anyone would/could have predicted, giving AMD a free 2yr shot at catching up. In normal times you would have never caught a break like that.

    ...but credit where its due, you have to make the most of others misfortune and she's done that.
  7. zigi1337

    zigi1337 TS Rookie

    dont be foolish... they got greedy, didnt push for 7nm manufacturing, they pumped up the prices because they could... in my book they failed. AMD took the risky technology bet and beat them fair and square.
    MikitaM, Reehahs, mbrowne5061 and 2 others like this.
  8. Footlong

    Footlong TS Addict Posts: 143   +73

    The only thing I want from AMD now is a decent GPU. I mean some are glad only with RTX 2080Ti performance. I can't afford it. I'm more interested in a GPU that offers RTX 2070/80 performance with a lower price, of course.
  9. Dosahka

    Dosahka TS Addict Posts: 149   +59

    I think AMD wants to secure the "best overall" first, then aim at HEDT later, which from AMD's point of view with Ms. Su as a CEO makes perfect sense to go with. Intel screwed up and abused AMD too much, same for NVIDIA and now they are getting bullied by AMD.
    AMD still behind in some areas, but catching up really quickly in the last couple years, others might seeing it as a "hit or miss", but it's more like getting slowly but surely up from the bottom.
  10. wiyosaya

    wiyosaya TS Evangelist Posts: 3,993   +2,290

    I mostly agree, however, I would not call honest competition bullying.

    Like @zigi1337 said, sIntel raised prices because they could. As I see it, sIntel got way too overconfident and then either consciously or unconsciously decided to slow further development of anything really meaningful. Honestly, I have an Ivy Bridge proc that is not much slower than today's sIntel parts including some of the way overpriced ones. To me, that is the definition of milking their product, and subsequently, their customers.

    And, IMO, because of sIntel, $2K for a HEDT part is acceptable - think the latest versions of Threadripper...

    Some would also argue that AMD does have the HEDT market now. As I see it, that is workstation territory and AMD's MT performance is better than sIntel in many cases ATM.

    To me, nVidia is playing that way too overconfident game ATM, too.

    I just hope that if the trend continues and AMD gets to the top in all areas, they do not fall into the way too overconfident trap.
    Dosahka likes this.
  11. Reehahs

    Reehahs TS Guru Posts: 729   +472

    Free 2 year shot? Last time Intel innovated was with core architecture. Everything else has been incremental piece meal overpriced products requiring switching the whole platform unnecessarily after every tick-tock cycle.

    Before Lisa AMD did Phenom and Bulldozer, with Lisa we got Ryzen.
    MikitaM likes this.
  12. ghostf1re

    ghostf1re TS Guru Posts: 414   +265

    Yup. Even if you're an Intel person, she made it better for everyone. By closing the gap between the two companies, she is helping to drive better competition. Everyone wins in this situation. They make money and we get better products. Even better than that, we get choice. I'm personally an Intel person myself, but no matter how you look at it, it's good for everyone.
    MikitaM likes this.
  13. Soaptrail

    Soaptrail TS Rookie

    In that case you have to give Intel credit because had they not announced the Itanium and created the vacuum intel would not have made the Althon and beat intel ~20 years ago.

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...