I guess I’m stupid then ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
But at least I got my 3090 at msrp at launch.
What may be coming out next year is of no use to me as I live in the present.
You may not feel that way now (although there are a few games that don't play at 4k 60fps (Ultra + RT) even today. And don't tell me the foolish argument that you can lower setting... you don't pay over $1k in this case $1.5k on the "best GPU" to play at Medium settings, that's really stupid (and I seen people saying that...).
But next year we will get more next gen games, that are not cross-gen like the ones we have now and those games will push the 3090/6900XT so hard it will crush them at 4k even with DLSS/FSR. That's why we will have such a huge jump with Lovelace and RDNA3, we need that power to actually play the next gen games that will come soon.
So when you see that happening to your 3090, you will think differently, if you have an ounce of self-reflection, that is. Some people will pretty much be oblivious to this change and they will keep living in their own cognitive dissonant reality pretending it's not true.
And here I am still using a GTX 660. If I had a 3070, it would certainly last me five years. Riding the bleeding edge of technology for the majority is a choice not a necessity.
If you buy the 3070 for 1080p (like I did with the 6700 XT) it will last you 4-5 years (without RT). But if you buy it because it can do 1440p today, you are wrong like so many others that live and buy for "today".
People nowadays take the wrong advice from so many YT channels and sites of "buy only for now, what is good enough now for you" and that is wrong. With that mentality you will need to constantly upgrade, as frequent as every year possibly, so you will lose a lot more money that way in the long run, than if you plan a little with your purchase and do a proper analysis of price/performance/longevity to buy a GPU for more than 2 years.
There only one caveat: you cannot do that for 4k rez. There is not GPU today that can last you 4 years (without major downgrade in IQ settings), like I said above as soon as next year those ludicrously expensive so called 4k GPUs of today will be mocked by next gen games and next gen GPUs alike.
But you can still apply this to 1440p to some degree, but mostly to 1080p.
The biggest issue here is the 4k dangling carrot (another one like RT). It's a stupid rez that people are hooked on for so many years now, yet for so many years we can't do proper 4k 60fps on all games without lowering the settings on some. So what's the use of 4k Medium, when you can do 1440p Ultra and unless you are nuts and play with pausing every 2 min and doing 600% zoom like DF, you will not notice the difference, but you will notice between Ultra and Medium settings, from a mile away.
And now they push 4k 120fps and 8k 60fps. Hahaha, that's the beyond stupid an even bigger dangling carrot.
News flash: even with a 2x perf upgrade of Lovelace and RDNA3 we will not do 4k 120fps Ultra + RT or 8k 60fps Ultra + RT. So what's the use of those crazy resolutions if you play on Medium settings on a $5000 or $10000 PC?
There will be this kind of "stupids" that pay those silly money thinking they are on the top of the world and either play at 8k 40fps maxed out or 60fps on Medium settings.
Riding the bleeding edge of technology for the majority is a choice not a necessity.
Yes, it's not a necessity, but actually for the majority is not even a choice, it's too expensive to be one.