New AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT info reveals high boost clocks, possible price tiers

[yRaz]

You are incorrect. The minimum specs listed for GTA6 includes an older 8GB card.

Try again.

The joke
----------------
Your head.


You literally can't play it right now on PC.

 

[Kirby1]

You are incorrect. The minimum specs listed for GTA6 includes an older 8GB card.

Try again.

There are no known minimum specs for GTA6 yet. Rockstar hasn't even confirmed a PC release yet.

Stop making things up.

Intel sells more GPUs simply because they sell the most CPUs and all their CPUs come with an Intel GPU, technically.

 

[Theinsanegamer]

I don't know why people continue to argue this point...
There's multiple options and configurations available at multiple (if elevated) price points...
You all get choices, so stop ragging on other peoples choices which for the most part are based on their budget and needs, and be happy with your own choices and options...

Personally I'm looking forward to the review of the RX 9060 XT 16GB to see how much of a performance upgrade I MIGHT get if I upgrade from my current ASUS 3060 Ti 8GB card...

When the presence of one's choice continues to deny advancement for others, the others are gonna get pissed. Dont know why that's hard to understand.

The longer 8GB cards stick around the longer games will continue to be compromised so that 8GB users can pretend to have modern hardware. Space Marine 2 looks WAY better with the 4k texture pack but with said pack cannot run on 8GB cards. Only reason that wasnt the default was, you guessed it, the presence of so many 8GB cards in the market.

Now, before you go "well you have the option thooooooo" most games do NOT get that 4k texture treatment. The only option you have for those games is the compromised version that runs on 8GB cards. And it's gonna get worse when the next gen consoles with 32GB of RAM drop in a couple years.

OK, give me that "credible" source. That source is wrong anyway so use better ones.

Here is one: https://www.jonpeddie.com/news/q424-pc-gpu-shipments-increased-by-4-4-from-last-quarter/

Intel: 65%
AMD: 18%
Nvidia: 16%

FYI, Intel has sold more than AMD+Nvidia combined over a decade in a row. And before you even start to say about your share is discrete ones, notice that desktop CPU share is only 31% and laptops 69%. Btw, every Nvidia laptop GPU is discrete, whereas most AMD and Intel ones are integrated.

I don't think there is need for your "source".

Nearly all of those intel GPUs are iGPUs present on all their CPU sales. They have no impact on the gaming scene.

It's like saying Honda is the biggest car maker because they've sold so many Supercub motorbikes, and those technically qualify as transportation.

 

[manowar51]

The joke
----------------
Your head.


You literally can't play it right now on PC.

Im glad I dont share your sense of humour...

 

[Kirby1]

Nvidia also sells trash like GT710 that have no impact on gaming scene. Much less than AMD APUs.


Your source is Jon Peddie Research. My source is Jon Peddie Research. Same source, different results. I understand numbers, you don't.

Tom's Hardware is just not lying. It's just you who is not understanding at all what you are writing about.

The person you are quoting has been wrong about other things, but they're not wrong about this, you are.

Intel ships more GPUs by nature of their iGPUs embedded in their CPUs compared to any other GPU maker, and the link you posted as a source earlier shows that. Specifically it shows that Intel has 65% of the market.

And we all know that Intel's iGPUs are not for gaming, they're just so people can get a display working without a dedicated GPU. So while yes technically Intel has the most market share, they definitely don't sell more GPUs in terms of dollars and market value compared to Nvidia or AMD.

 

[HardReset]

The person you are quoting has been wrong about other things, but they're not wrong about this, you are.

Intel ships more GPUs by nature of their iGPUs embedded in their CPUs compared to any other GPU maker, and the link you posted as a source earlier shows that. Specifically it shows that Intel has 65% of the market.

And we all know that Intel's iGPUs are not for gaming, they're just so people can get a display working without a dedicated GPU. So while yes technically Intel has the most market share.They definitely don't sell more GPUs in terms of dollars and market value compared to Nvidia or AMD.

Some Intel GPUs are faster on gaming than Nvidia low end trash like GT710. For AMD APUs, even more are faster than low end Nvidias. Now remember that original claim:

Remember AMD only sell one GPU for every 9 Nvidia sell.

To put it another way, Nvidia sells 9 times more (that is, amount) GPUs than AMD.

Now, stick with original claim, try to understand it, and say again why I'm wrong here.

 

[Kirby1]

Some Intel GPUs are faster on gaming than Nvidia low end trash like GT710. For AMD APUs, even more are faster than low end Nvidias. Now remember that original claim:



To put it another way, Nvidia sells 9 times more (that is, amount) GPUs than AMD.

Now, stick with original claim, try to understand it, and say again why I'm wrong here.

Also wrong because AMD also sells CPUs with iGPUs now.

Nvidia is the only GPU maker that only makes high end GPUs.

Being faster that a GeForce 710 is meaningless. Intel iGPUs have been somewhat decent for very low end gaming for some time.

 

[HardReset]

Also wrong because AMD also sells CPUs with iGPUs now.

Nvidia is the only GPU maker that only makes high end GPUs.

Being faster that a GeForce 710 is meaningless. Intel iGPUs have been somewhat decent for very low end gaming for some time.

Those have no effect on original claim which is, as argumented, wrong.

 

[Puiu]

In europe I can find the 9070 and 9070 XT at around MSRP (I checked germany, romania and france) when you remove the VAT from the online price.

So the 9060 XT being above 500 makes no sense and seems to just be a placeholder price.

The prices in the US seem to be way out of whack.

 

[yRaz]

In europe I can find the 9070 and 9070 XT at around MSRP (I checked germany, romania and france) when you remove the VAT from the online price.

So the 9060 XT being above 500 makes no sense and seems to just be a placeholder price.

The prices in the US seem to be way out of whack.

US prices make no sense right now. Atleast I know this won't last forever, I just hope it ends before I need to upgrade. 7700x and a 6700xt are just not the beans right now

 

[Kirby1]

Those have no effect on original claim which is, as argumented, wrong.

You posted the link. It shows clearly that Intel has 65% market. We all know that is due to iGPUs. What more do you want?

 

[HardReset]

You posted the link. It shows clearly that Intel has 65% market. We all know that is due to iGPUs. What more do you want?

What do You want?

Remember AMD only sell one GPU for every 9 Nvidia sell.

What have iGPUs to do with this one? Nothing.

And as you could see from my source, AMD sells MORE GPUs than Nvidia. What are you trying to tell here?

 

[Kirby1]

What do You want?

What have iGPUs to do with this one? Nothing.

And as you could see from my source, AMD sells MORE GPUs than Nvidia. What are you trying to tell here?

I guess we are just coming to terms with ur inability to separate different data sets.