An internet tax that would charge by the gigabyte just squeaked through France's lower house

zohaibahd

Posts: 1,006   +21
Staff
WTF?! These days, moving a gigabyte of data across the internet usually costs companies well under a cent. France, however, wants them to pay several times that just in tax. Lawmakers there narrowly voted on Friday to charge content providers 5.5 cents for every gigabyte they send to French users – though the measure still has a long way to go before it becomes law.

Socialist deputy Laurent Lhardit's amendment passed the National Assembly by just 11 votes to 10. In fact, only 35 of the chamber's 577 deputies were even in the room at the time. Both the government and the budget's own rapporteur had advised against it, too.

If it survives, subscribers wouldn't be billed directly. Instead, ISPs like Orange, SFR, Bouygues Telecom and Free would tally how much data reaches their customers from each sender. Content providers would then owe €0.055 per gigabyte. That bill would be capped at 15% of French revenue or 2% of global revenue.

All told, Lhardit's group expects the tax to raise €10 billion a year. That figure leans on telecom regulator Arcep's estimate that about 200 billion gigabytes flow to French subscribers annually. Roughly half of that traffic comes from just five companies – Google, Meta, Amazon, Netflix and Akamai.

Budget minister David Amiel has his doubts, though. For one, he questioned whether the count could even work without flow sensors on networks or measurements taken on users' own devices. He also reckoned about half the bill would land on smaller content providers, many of them French. Meanwhile, VideoLAN, the French nonprofit behind VLC, warned it would be on the hook for more than €1 million a year.

For his part, Lhardit insists subscribers won't have to pay a thing. But Philippe Juvin, the budget's rapporteur, cautioned during the debate that the biggest platforms could simply pass the cost on to advertisers.

That kind of pass-through has already played out in France once. When its 3% digital services tax kicked in back in 2019, Amazon responded by raising fees for French marketplace sellers by 3%. Apple and Google later followed with higher charges for app developers and advertisers in the country.

If platforms pass the cost along again, the per-gigabyte math adds up quickly for games. Grand Theft Auto VI's reported 210 GB download alone would cost its distributor about €11.55 for every copy grabbed in France.

Before any of that matters, the tax still has to clear the Senate, where a conservative Les Républicains majority is unlikely to back it. Assembly president Yaël Braun-Pivet has also urged Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu to force the budget through without a vote under Article 49.3. If he does, the government can simply leave the amendment out.

Permalink to story:

 
I don't believe this will actually pass to the law. It is a crazy idea and would be devastating for access to the information. What they want to achieve - corporations paying taxes where the income was factually made - need to have a better execution not affecting ordinary people, who will in the end simply see the cost of any internet traffic passed to them, which for French companies would mean paying taxes twice...
 
Socialist deputy Laurent Lhardit's amendment passed the National Assembly by just 11 votes to 10. In fact, only 35 of the chamber's 577 deputies were even in the room at the time.
The only normal thing here is the fact this idi0cy comes from a socialist.

Passing with 11 of 577 votes (or less than 2%) is probably a world record. The stupidity of the "measure" is undoubtedly a world record.
What's next? Maybe installing spyware on every device to measure the traffic for tax purposes?

Depriving your own people from information was typical for the late USSR, I can't imagine the same may happen in France.
 
Passing with 11 of 577 votes (or less than 2%) is probably a world record. The stupidity of the "measure" is undoubtedly a world record.
What's next? Maybe installing spyware on every device to measure the traffic for tax purposes?

Depriving your own people from information was typical for the late USSR, I can't imagine the same may happen in France.
Nothing has happened which could endanger the access to information. Normal democratic procedure is taking its turns. Some guys wanted to get some fame and voted for an amendment to the proposed budget. The budget is not live and will be voted later this year, and any amendments which wont get the final approval will be scrapped. We already know this one will be scrapped as it was widely commented on French political stage.

You don't have to imagine anything, nothing is happening, there are rules to propose amendments and rules to actually implement them into law. They had right to propose and to add them, they used those rights and planned it nicely to ensure it will be voted on on the actual budget, and they know it has no chance to pass.
 
It’s a nasty habit in France to push through the shittiest, most useless laws in a nearly empty legislative chamber. They’re bound to churn out more gems like this one—just another example of how disconnected our deputies are from real life.
 
The idea that consumers won't pay for this because the tax targets content providers is laughable. Netflix, YouTube, and everyone else will just adjust their pricing, advertising, or services to compensate.

Also... only 21 lawmakers voting on something that could change how the internet operates in France is arguably the craziest part of this story. Where were the other 556?
 
As someone who hoards data and has a server closet with over 200TB in storage used, this is the dumbest idea I've ever heard of.

Everyone would be watching movies and TV in 540p and listening to music in compressed 128k format -- much like we all were back in the 1990's. It would be a giant leap back!
 
The idea that consumers won't pay for this because the tax targets content providers is laughable. Netflix, YouTube, and everyone else will just adjust their pricing, advertising, or services to compensate.

Also... only 21 lawmakers voting on something that could change how the internet operates in France is arguably the craziest part of this story. Where were the other 556?
Could you imagine trying to watch a movie on a streaming platform you subscribe to, and needing to justify what quality you stream it in because 4K quality costs $5 to stream? So you choose to watch in 540p and it's all blocky, and you still pay 50 cents for that low quality garbage stream. lol
 
Everyone would be watching movies and TV in 540p and listening to music in compressed 128k format -- much like we all were back in the 1990's. It would be a giant leap back!

Yes, then Sammy can have all his RAM because you won't need it. /s
 
Back