Artificial beauty? Exploring the world of AI models in the inaugural Miss AI pageant

midian182

Posts: 11,726   +177
Staff member
WTF?! In news that will likely elicit the use of the Professor Farnsworth "I don't want to live on this planet anymore" meme, this month will see the inaugural "Miss AI" beauty pageant take place. Judges – two human and two virtual models – will choose an AI-generated model in a competition that will be handing out thousands of dollars in prizes.

Produced by the UK-based creator subscription platform Fanvue alongside the World AI Creator Awards (WAICA), the Miss AI competition is offering prizes totalling over $20,000. The winner receives a $5,000 cash prize, along with AI mentorship programs and PR services worth $7,000.

The photorealistic entrants have been generated using "off-the-shelf and proprietary" AI tools. The models have Instagram profiles where they show off their artificial lives and homes, post updates, and even interact with fans.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

A post shared by Asena İlik (@aisenailik)

The four judges, only two of whom are real, will be rating the models based on their beauty, the way the technology was used to create them, and their "social clout," which is an assessment based on their engagement numbers with fans, audience growth, and utilization of platforms such as Instagram.

One of the contestants, a Brazilian-made AI called Ailya Lou, has almost 11,000 Instagram followers. There are some fairly realistic video clips on her profile, though they still have the uncanny valley effect that make them obvious AI creations.

Much like the real Miss World, the AI contestants support good causes, using social media feeds to talk about them. NPR notes that Anne Kerdi is a brand ambassador for the ocean conservation fund Océanopolis Acts, and Romania's Aiyana Rainbow (below) is described as an LGBTQ advocate.

The judges have selected ten finalists from 1,500 submissions. The Miss AI results will be announced at the end of June.

The popularity of beauty pageants has been declining over the last couple of decades as social values change. The organizers say the AI competition is a "monumental leap forward," but many argue this competition is even worse than traditional events, given the exaggerated, unrealistic, and fake young women that are on show.

So-called AI influencers can earn big money. One of the judges of the event, Aitana Lopez, aka "Spain's first AI model," can earn up to €10,000 ($10,800) a month doing modeling work for brands. Lopez's creator, an AI modeling agency called The Clueless, hopes that more brands will start using AI models rather than real people to advertise their products. The appeal to companies seems obvious: an unageing model who isn't going to cause any controversy. Could this be yet another area where AI takes human jobs?

Permalink to story:

 
Imagine the groomers.....
They will have a field day with this tech.... I hope the police are ready to start arresting thousands of pedo rapists
 
Honestly this is fine. When it comes to modelling work and beauty awards, there are always controversies about abusive behaviour towards the women, unrealistic expectations to women's bodies, pressure to look a specific way, stories years after of sexual misconduct towards the women. If you remove the real women from modelling, real women won't get hurt.
 
Just a matter of time before these start getting introduced as mods on https://www.nexusmods.com.

As for the moral question, it is... really complicated, for all genders. At a minimum, don't let this be a substitute for interacting with real humans.
 
- Eh whatever.

Seems more like an AI training competition in disguise, just that the output is intended to create pretty ladies instead of abstract art or whatever.

Imagine the groomers.....
They will have a field day with this tech.... I hope the police are ready to start arresting thousands of pedo rapists

- Honestly if pederasts focused their attention on fake AI generated creations and left actual real life kids alone then that's a huge, huge win in my book.

Honestly this is fine. When it comes to modelling work and beauty awards, there are always controversies about abusive behaviour towards the women, unrealistic expectations to women's bodies, pressure to look a specific way, stories years after of sexual misconduct towards the women. If you remove the real women from modelling, real women won't get hurt.

- To be fair, we'll go from "unrealistic beauty standards" to "literally unreal beauty standards" which can and does have an effect on people's mental health and self perception.
 
I didn't see a single pic of an AI model that was nearly as pretty as my top ten famous, REAL women.

Dear AI: Stick to math and whatever else I don't need you for. Digital middle finger EFF-YOU
 
That girl , the first , looks like Alexandra Botez - a canadian/american chess master . also a streamer . There are so many pretty women , why do we need artificially created ones !?

maybe a cross with their russian chess streamer friend a bit as well , though my facial skill recognition is probably below average
 
Ah great, just another attack on men and woman, distorting beauty standards for both sexes.

Keep your boys and daughters away from these platforms people, it is not good for their self image and the way they view the other sex.

Be well
 
Back