Asus Crosshair IV Extreme Review: Lucid HydraLogix Inside

By Julio Franco ยท 12 replies
Nov 30, 2010
Post New Reply
  1. Without beating around the bush, what separates the Crosshair IV Extreme apart from the pack is Asus' CrossLinx 3 technology. This allows users to mix and match multiple graphics cards from both AMD and Nvidia, including models of different GPU generations. CrossLinx 3 uses the Lucid HydraLogix engine, which bridges various graphics cards to enable their simultaneous usage.

    Read the full review at:

    Please leave your feedback here.
  2. Burty117

    Burty117 TechSpot Chancellor Posts: 3,146   +911

    Soo... I won't be buying one of these in a hurry!
  3. Arris

    Arris TS Evangelist Posts: 4,730   +379

    But look at all the pretty lined up capacitors! *swoon*
    Seriously though, some nice features but the Hydralogix seems a bit beta at the moment from what's been said in this review. And it's aimed at a very specialist segment of the market. I can understand it if it can be put into cheaper motherboards and allow people to get a performance gain from pairing two older generation cards, or sticking an older card in with their newer one when buying a different companies solution to get a performance boost. But can't really see the appeal of buying one of these and buying one AMD and one Nvidia card to put in it. Surely it will never offer a performance boost in comparison to running Crossfired or SLI'd setups.
  4. The layout looks incredible! Too bad the technology is obviously not ready for prime time.
  5. Yup. Invest 300 bucks in a dead platform. Amd can't keep adding cores forever. And with sandy bridge will hold the high end like the core series does now.

    I hope amd starts doing something soon.
  6. Leeky

    Leeky TS Evangelist Posts: 3,797   +117

    It definitely got my attention, it appears to be the "cleanest" motherboard design I've ever seen - everything seems to have an order and layout to it, and I love how all the components are grouped together.

    For that, and its overclocking features alone I'd consider it, but the deciding factor has to be the viability of the Hydra setup. If its ready in 6 months time for the big stage I'll definitely be having one of these.
  7. fpsgamerJR62

    fpsgamerJR62 TS Rookie Posts: 489

    The weak link in this Hydralogix thing is that AMD and Nvidia will never support their hardware. They'll always be playing catch-up with each game and driver release. Nvidia should just go back to selling Nforce chips to AMD so that gamers who are using AMD CPUs can have SLI on their boards in addition to Crossfire and not to have to shift to an Intel platform.
  8. princeton

    princeton TS Addict Posts: 1,676

    Wasn't AMD the ones who said no Nforce chips? Same with Intel. Intel mobos support sli natively in most cases.
  9. lawfer

    lawfer TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,270   +91

    Ok, I admit, it does look sexy.
  10. DokkRokken

    DokkRokken TS Rookie Posts: 267

    Lucid must have one of the best marketing teams on Earth. I cannot imagine how they manage to continue selling their chips, when performance is so markedly poor compared to SLI and Crossfire.

    Coming from an AMD owner, this board is simply way too much money for the platform, especially given that a few already excellent 890FX boards can be had for half the price. You'd have to really love AMD to justify this board over an Intel X58, especially when you're likely also factoring in an expensive hexa-core Phenom II.

    Plus, AMD users like myself who run nVidia cards can also use the SLI Hack, as that has become far smoother to operate lately, and offers results that easily better Lucid's, and no Hydra, nForce chip or extra cash is required.
  11. red1776

    red1776 Omnipotent Ruler of the Universe Posts: 5,224   +164

    expensive Phenom II hexa? they are quite the opposite, Unless you just meant that they will be pairing it with an upper end AMD that bad :)
    I agree though with the sentiment though, who is going to buy this for 300.00 (about $75.00 of it is for lucid) and crossfire/SLI different makes and older cards? this is an enthusiast board and and folks who but this are not going to piece meal together their graphic solutions. the only advantage i can see is maybe the ability to crossfire say the 5000 series with the 6000 series. I was looking forward to this board as a possible upgrade to my Crosshair IV Formula , but see not one good reason to do so.
  12. Considering this MB is the most expensive AM3 solution I would have expected the testing to include similar AM3 offerings with the 890FX chipset from Gigabyte, MSI, and others using the same CPU/RAM. Is it really worth buying? Would the Gigabyte MB with the 890FX chipset or other similar MBs perform as good or better and cost less?
  13. Steve

    Steve TechSpot Editor Posts: 2,869   +2,037

    Are you asking if all 890FX boards perform equal? Then the short answer would be yes they do. We have done a number of motherboard roundups over the years and we always find that the performance between boards using the same chip to be much the same. Where they differ is in overclocking performance, features and price.

Similar Topics

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...