Bad temp readings? Afterburner, Catalyst, GPUZ, Overdrive. Who to believe?

[edison5do]

Hi, I recentrly build my new system, and I have x2 HD 5770 for CrossFired, And my temp reading of a single card are getting all diferent based on the software I use, For Example..

GPUZ said that my cards are around 78c - 85c, and even 92 one time, after 6 minutes on stability test with Stock MHz and the fan 95%.

Furmark Says that my cards are around 65c - 72c, fan 95%

MSI afterburner says the same as furmark (Never simultaneouly, I always use them separate).

The catalyst always says the same of the overdrive as they both are AMD's.

I have not tested any other programs, but im getting worried about the temp reading because if GPUZ is the one that is saying the truth I will basically burn the cards if I put them together.

Wich one would you trust the most for the temp reading.?

 

[gwailo247]

These are heat specs according to TS's review:

https://www.techspot.com/review/209-ati-radeon-hd-5770/page11.html

They're using Furmark too, and your ranges seem to be in line with theirs.

I cannot speak for GPUZ heat monitoring ability

 

[edison5do]

They're using Furmark too, and your ranges seem to be in line with theirs.

I cannot speak for GPUZ heat monitoring ability

Thank you, Basically then I will just Ignore the GpuZ's reading because im getting the normal temp with the same software that TS use... That's reasonable so.. Thanks