Bill Gates says AI will end doctor and teacher shortages, transform the future of work

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,012   +58
Staff
In brief: Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder long known for his focus on global health and education, has predicted that artificial intelligence could soon resolve some of the world's most persistent workforce shortages. Speaking on the "People by WTF" podcast, Gates argued that AI's rapid progress will make it possible to overcome the chronic lack of doctors and teachers – a problem that has plagued both developed and developing countries for decades.

"AI will come in and provide medical IQ, and there won't be a shortage," Gates said, pointing to nations like India and those across Africa where the scarcity of medical professionals remains acute.

The United States faces similar challenges. An Association of American Medical Colleges report projected that by 2036, the US could be short by as many as 86,000 physicians, specialists, and primary care doctors.

To address these gaps and ease burnout, healthcare-focused AI startups such as Suki, Zephyr AI, and Tennr have raised billions of dollars by promising to automate routine tasks like billing and note-taking, improve diagnostic accuracy, and help identify patients for new treatments. Consulting firm McKinsey estimates that generative AI could boost productivity in healthcare and pharmaceuticals by as much as $370 billion.

The education sector is experiencing similar strains. In the US, federal data from 2023 showed that 86 percent of K-12 public schools struggled to hire teachers for the 2023-24 school year, with 45 percent reporting they were understaffed.

But Gates' forecast extends well beyond medicine and education. He envisions a future where AI and robotics transform blue-collar work as well. "The hands have to be awfully good to do those things. We'll achieve that," Gates said, referring to the dexterity required for factory jobs, construction, and hospitality.

Tech giants like Nvidia are investing heavily in humanoid robots designed to pick items in warehouses and scrub floors, aiming to reduce labor costs and increase efficiency.

Such sweeping changes could fundamentally alter the nature of work itself. Gates believes that as AI takes on more roles, people may be able to retire earlier or work shorter weeks. "You can retire early, you can work shorter workweeks," he said. "It's going to require almost a philosophical rethink about, 'OK, how should time be spent?'"

He acknowledged that this vision represents a dramatic shift from the world he grew up in. "It's hard for those of us – in my case, spending almost 70 years in a world of shortage – even to adjust my mind," Gates admitted. He referenced economist John Maynard Keynes, who in 1930 predicted that technological advances could eventually reduce the workweek to just 15 hours. Nearly a century later, most people still work about 40 hours a week, despite significant productivity gains.

For Gates, the prospect of a world where work is optional is profound and personally relevant. "I don't have to work," he said. "I choose to work. Because? Because it's fun."

Permalink to story:

 
Of course it will end the teachers' shortages...as there will be no one teaching eventually as more and more people will be taking virtual classes with A.I as their instructors replacing human teachers.....
 
Last edited:
Of course it will end the teachers' shortages...as there will be none teaching eventually as more and more people will be taking virtual classes with A.I as their instructors replacing human teachers.....
I mean, I've met a lot of really dumb teachers. I went to a good private school and when I went off to college I ended up having to teach myself most of the subjects. I remember my organic chemistry teacher would just sit there and read out of the text book to us. I'll never forget getting into an argument with her about what monomers are. It was 2 hours long 3 days a week of just this person reading out of a book in a monotone voice who didn't even understand the material themselves. I dropped out once my scholarship money ran out, I wasn't paying for that.
 
Last edited:

AI will end doctor and teacher shortages
Next year right? Uh-huh..

I remember my organic chemistry teacher would just sit there and read out of the text book to us.
My teacher for an intro course 'Digital Electronics', in a 100 person auditorium, would face the white board, mumble to himself, and draw the pictures from the text book on the board. Like everyday... Attendance went from like 80 down to 15 over the first couple of weeks.

I had the same teacher later on in a graduate course for manufacturing circuits on silicon wafers via chemical vapor deposition (can't remember course's precise name). That same mumbly teacher was fantastic. I figure the intro course was boring AF to him and he had zero passion for it.
 
Why do these out of touch tech moguls always say this?

"You can retire early, you can work shorter workweeks," he said. "It's going to require almost a philosophical rethink about, 'OK, how should time be spent?'"

That is such a load of Bull. When has this ever happened with an kind of advancement? What it actually means is that ***** managers and CEOs will either try to replace people completely with AI (I guess that is one way to look at early retirement) or more likely just expect people to work harder and accomplish more. I just wish these Ivory Tower A-holes would bugger off and TechSpot wouldn't report on their BS.

AI will help the medical industry for sure. But LLMs are notorious for giving fabricated answers and any idea that a human Dr. doesn't actually make the diagnosis is completely bat $ crazy. I can't wait for Billing to become AI so they can find even more ways to screw you over and deny claims.

The enshitification continues. Excuse me while I go yell at some clouds :/
 
Funny there is no mention of lawyers. Well, you need legislation to make it possible but lawyers will fight against it so it's not easy.
 
Of course it will end the teachers' shortages...as there will be none teaching eventually as more and more people will be taking virtual classes with A.I as their instructors replacing human teachers.....
A lot of the shortages are at the elementary school level and those kids need a human element to their learning. I would also add the human element to doctor & patient relationships that AI can't provide. Gates himself has never been a big fan of human contact so that can appeal to him.
 
Last edited:
You can only retire early if you have created enough excess value above your living costs to amass enough wealth to live off it.

It doesn't matter if robots can do my work for me, if I don't have enough money to pay for the robots to do my work for me.

AI can be a tool for some people to create more value in a day/week/year that let's them make more and (if they don't just spend more) retire earlier. But not all people. Gates is so out of touch on how W2 people make money that he can't even see this fact.
 
It's worth noting that the both areas with shortages have been largely removed from the free market. Both teachers with government schools and doctors with middle men insurance paid for by yet another third party, don't respond to changes in demand or differentiate on quality because their customers (government and insurance) don't care about either of those things.

The funny thing is that (superior) private schools often cost less than government schools, except the cost of government schools is forced on everyone so the private school cost is in addition to the "free" school which is why only higher income people can afford it - and pay for school twice.
 
I'm a teacher, and while I doubt AI can replace my experience and how I tie the real world to the books and curriculum in any meaningful way. I'll be interested in seeing it keep up with poor behavior, loss of interest, sleeping in class, motivation, etc. You'd have the same thing that would happen if I did nothing else but impart information.....20 kids doing whatever they please and learning nothing.
 
When has technology allowed anybody to "retire early"? Increased productivity just makes everybody more competitive, not more valuable. Value is relative! So, unfortunately, when everybody is more productive, nobody is really more valuable than anybody else based on productivity alone.




It's worth noting that the both areas with shortages have been largely removed from the free market. Both teachers with government schools and doctors with middle men insurance paid for by yet another third party, don't respond to changes in demand or differentiate on quality because their customers (government and insurance) don't care about either of those things.

The funny thing is that (superior) private schools often cost less than government schools, except the cost of government schools is forced on everyone so the private school cost is in addition to the "free" school which is why only higher income people can afford it - and pay for school twice.


I see you're really trying to tick off the public-sector shills. Next you're gonna assert that not all workers are equally valuable and should therefore be paid in regards to their talent or performance. What will those supposedly talented public-sector union workers do if/when the general public is no longer forced to pay their salaries?
 
A student that is considering becoming a doctor is looking at 12 to 16 years of school/training, crushing student debt, crazy work load, and a work place that is increasingly owned by venture capital (in the US) that cares about money rather than medicine. Patients know that a medical visit may bankrupt them so they will be reluctant to go (sicker) and even more suspicious of treatments. Why is that Tylenol marked up to $175 again? Meanwhile, if AI ever becomes useful, will put unlimited downward pressure on people income. AI, they claim, will become better in time, meanwhile the student, if successful, will at best match status quo. I humbly disagree with Bill, and suggest that AI will drive a crushing shortage of doctors instead and maybe the profession for people will go away entirely over the next 50 years or so.

With educators, the shortage is more a function of low pay, and I am sure the current hostile political clime has a chilling effect, too.
 
Last edited:
Also, Microsoft is investing at least $1bn in OpenAI. OpenAI is loudest fear monger among them. Theyse companies need to find something useful for the AI to do, and intimidating the cometition is one way to stack the cards. I wasn't able to express myself the way I wanted due to content filtering.
 
Last edited:
Nvidia ( is the number one ai company in the world) can't get it's drivers in order but somehow ai will replace Doctors who were trust with our health and Teachers with our youth. 🤡🤡🤡
Can't wait until he retires his crony gig!
 
A lot of the shortages are at the elementary school level and those kids need a human element to their learning. I would also add the human element to doctor & patient relationships that AI can't provide. Gates himself has never been a big fan of human contact so that can appeal to him.
If you think about it, you don't need an actual human teacher for elementary either, all you need is a classroom guardian or a facilitator such a glorified "teacher's aid" to keep control of the students while classes are in session, but aside from a facilitator, kids learn quite quick from even a tablet....it will be a terrible future but a future that will eventually happen.
 
AI and automation will eventually wipe out the working class and nullify the need for and utility of, low level human labor. Think the ruling class will try to create purpose for the now disenfranchised or take care of them? Fat chance.
 
Tech companies are revving up for Gen A/B and beyond as they will be indoctrinated into AI when growing up. We are in the testing phase/generation.

If you're lucky to work alongside AI, you'll have to be "The best of the best of the best" and perhaps political. As long as people (consumers) are concerned about costs of goods and services and want it right away AI robots will be utilized in the labor field.
 
AI and automation will eventually wipe out the working class and nullify the need for and utility of, low level human labor. Think the ruling class will try to create purpose for the now disenfranchised or take care of them? Fat chance.
The outcomes would be self-triggered effects.
I mean we witnessed it many times in history.
When a lot of people become extremely poor,
they begin to ask why those other people are still so rich.
Our rich should be pulling hair, spending good portion of their daily lives
thinking about how they can create new jobs and integrate people losing jobs
to AI. Which they of course do not. If anything, they would race each other competing
how many more human jobs they could cut compared to the rivals'.
 
Sure, Bill! Everyone believes everything you say! I'll rush right out and invest my retirement funds in AI. /s
 
Why does anyone care what this guy says? People act like he's an expert at everything.
To me, it certainly does not sound like he's an expert at health since his statement seems to imply that humans should spend more time sitting on their collective a$$es.
 
To me, it certainly does not sound like he's an expert at health since his statement seems to imply that humans should spend more time sitting on their collective a$$es.

The sitting doesn't do the damage anywhere near as the diet. My body provides evidence of this, as I have not trained in five years, and, while a few pounds less massive, my diet has kept me looking lean and mean. Of course a diet most of you likely cannot do, so.....tech to the rescue, right?
 
Back