Canada introduces social media ban for under 16s

midian182

Posts: 11,708   +177
Staff member
In a nutshell: Another country is joining the rapidly growing list of nations to ban social media use among children. Canada has introduced proposed legislation that would prevent anyone younger than 16 from having accounts on these services, though there is a workaround for the tech firms covered by the rules.

Bill C-34, also known as the Safe Social Media Act, would make social media services and some AI chatbot providers responsible for protecting children from online harms. The Canadian government says the aim is to shift the burden away from parents and onto companies designing platforms that keep young users scrolling.

The bill would create a new Digital Safety Commission of Canada to enforce the rules, issue compliance orders, and impose penalties. Platforms would have to assess and mitigate risks, publish safety plans, give users clearer ways to flag harmful content and block others. They would also have to reduce children's exposure to seven categories of harmful material, including content that sexually exploits children, promotes self-harm, enables bullying, foments hatred, incites violence, or supports terrorism and violent extremism.

AI chatbot services would face duties tailored to their technology, including measures around harmful responses and crisis situations in which a user may be at risk of hurting themselves or someone else.

"Social media platforms and AI chatbots are designed to capture attention. They do not support healthy childhood development and have become a source of anxiety, isolation, depression and a range of other mental health challenges for many young Canadians," said Marjorie Michel, Canada's Minister of Health.

The loophole, or incentive, depending on your view, is that social media platforms can apply for an exemption from the under-16 account ban if they can show they have sufficient safeguards in place for children. The government has yet to spell out exactly what those safeguards will involve, though adult-content services will not be eligible.

Canada is following Australia, which became the first country to introduce a national under-16 social media ban and has since forced platforms to disable millions of accounts. Brazil, Malaysia, and Indonesia have also introduced or announced age-based restrictions, while France, Spain, Norway, Denmark, Thailand, and South Korea are among the countries studying or developing similar measures.

In the US, the fight has mostly unfolded at state level. Florida passed one of the strictest laws, banning accounts for children 14 and under and requiring parental consent for 15-year-olds, while Utah, Tennessee, Mississippi, and others have passed parental-consent, age-verification, or app-store-focused rules. Many have faced lawsuits or been blocked by courts.

It looks almost certain that the UK will be next. The government appears set to pursue restrictions on "harmful" social media for under-16s, alongside measures targeting AI chatbots, gaming, addictive design features, and child nudity protections, including on-device image scanning. The White House has urged Britain not to adopt an Australian-style ban, warning that sweeping rules could burden US tech companies.

Permalink to story:

 
The corporations are fighting like hell to make sure they have access to you 24-7, on the plane, on the train, on the bus, on the boats, wherever thou are.

...and they want your children...

This is not about free speech. This is not about censorship.

Smartphones are devices that virtually all of our scientific study and real world testing has proven are harmful for children and developing minds.

I thank all the governments and all the politicians who drew the line regardless what Big Tech had to say.

Special thanks to China.
 
"Shifting the burden away from parents."

Is a polite way of admitting the parents feed their children to the machine. Countless pre-signup profiles will be deleted, farmed from baby photos users excitedly share with loved ones. Profits will be lost. Sounds like a win to me. That being said, I'm sure the Canadian government will come out of this with a little more casual spying power on citizens. Otherwise, why bother?
 
"social media ban for under-16s"
Good luck enforcing this.
Even if the companies involved comply many if not all these kids will find a workaround.

I hope I'm wrong but really really doubt it.
 
That's fine. It will still block the majority.
Yeah, it's not even required to truly block it, just make so much friction that it's not enjoyable for kids and the way they like to socialize. They'll find something else to do that doesn't suck.
 
The corporations are fighting like hell to make sure they have access to you 24-7, on the plane, on the train, on the bus, on the boats, wherever thou are.

...and they want your children...

This is not about free speech. This is not about censorship.

Smartphones are devices that virtually all of our scientific study and real world testing has proven are harmful for children and developing minds.

I thank all the governments and all the politicians who drew the line regardless what Big Tech had to say.

Special thanks to China.

Not only children's minds.
 
The corporations are fighting like hell to make sure they have access to you 24-7, on the plane, on the train, on the bus, on the boats, wherever thou are.

...and they want your children...

Smartphones are devices that virtually all of our scientific study and real world testing has proven are harmful for children...
These drama-queen histrionics aren't helpful. Banning children from social media won't take away their smart phones. Nor is does a mild statement that tech firms hope these new regulations will be enacted in a manner that's not overly draconic mean they're "fighting like hell". Do you know what the word "fighting" even means?

Personally, I'd favor a total ban on, not just social media, but smart phones for all children. But I don't see that happening.
 
Last edited:
These drama-queen histrionics aren't helpful. Banning children from social media won't take away their smart phones. Nor is does a mild statement that tech firms hope these new regulations will be enacted in a manner that's not overly draconic mean they're "fighting like hell". Do you know what the word "fighting" even means?

Personally, I'd favor a total ban on, not just social media, but smart phones for all children. But I don't see that happening.
It's still a good start. They can tweak it later. And bans of phones in schools can be done locally, they don't have major corporations to tackle there.

As for the "overly draconic" statement, it's a clear regulation - it's a ban on kids on social media.
 
These drama-queen histrionics aren't helpful. Banning children from social media won't take away their smart phones. Nor is does a mild statement that tech firms hope these new regulations will be enacted in a manner that's not overly draconic mean they're "fighting like hell". Do you know what the word "fighting" even means?

Personally, I'd favor a total ban on, not just social media, but smart phones for all children. But I don't see that happening.


I can clearly see a difference in NYC public high schools.

#1 No fights recorded in school - they don't have phones
#2 No illegal activity in the school recorded.
#3 More focus on the teachers during class.

I'm not going to argue it: It's already put in hack and I want it to stay that way.
 
Back