Norway set to become the next country to ban under-16s from social media

midian182

Posts: 11,726   +177
Staff member
In brief: The number of countries banning children from using social media continues to grow. The next to join the list will likely be Norway, which will present a bill to parliament stopping under-16s from accessing the platforms. It will also make companies responsible for introducing robust age-verification tools to ensure they comply with the law.

Norway's Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre said the legislation was being introduced to ensure "a childhood where children get to be children."

"Play, friendships, and everyday life must not be taken over by algorithms and screens," he added. "This is an important measure to safeguard children's digital lives."

The minority Labour government added that the bill will be introduced to parliament by the end of 2026.

Australia became the first democratic country to impose age-based social media restrictions in December, passing bipartisan legislation that sets a mandatory minimum age of 16 to open and operate social media accounts.

Since the Australian ban, France, Indonesia, Austria, Spain, Turkey, Denmark, Malaysia, Greece, Poland, and Slovenia have introduced similar social media restrictions or are considering them.

One country struggling to introduce a ban is the UK. MPs voted 260 to 161 against a Lords amendment to the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill this week that would have forced platforms deemed harmful to raise their access age to 16 within 12 months.

Ministers argue that a consultation, rather than an immediate ban, is the better route, with the government instead favoring more flexible powers that could include curfews, scrolling limits, location-sharing restrictions, or targeted blocks on specific services and features. The consultation, which closes May 26, is also looking beyond traditional social media to cover risks from gaming, messaging services, and AI chatbots.

One of the problems with these types of bans is their questionable effectiveness. Earlier this month, a study by the UK-based suicide prevention charity Molly Rose Foundation found that 61%, or three in five, Australian 12- to 15-year-olds who had accounts on restricted platforms before the ban came into force still had access to one or more accounts.

Several US states have already introduced their own age-related social media bans or restrictions. It's long been assumed that a nationwide ban would never happen, but the prospect has become more likely following the social media addiction lawsuit in which Meta was found liable for harming children.

Permalink to story:

 
Or we could just stick with that 'freedom' thing that's been working out well so far.

Children need to be protected from certain products, services, and life choices. But adults get to make their own decisions.
I’m with you on the freedom thing but I do have to point out that “adults” are severely lacking in the USA and that is clearly partly due to social media influence. The number of 30-year-old’s I’ve met that are stunted emotionally and intellectually is staggering and disheartening. The “feed” is bad for your health and just saying “freedom” doesn’t make the future brighter. I don’t think we should let it become a crisis before we make a change somewhere. If I trusted our educational system and parents to solve that problem then I’d be all for the free-market approach. Unfortunately, that doesn’t seem to be a trend that’s providing appropriate results. Also, it’s been working until recently. Social media is new. The resulting trend is clear.
 
As a Norwegian with children under 16 - I support this bill, the endless scrolling on tik tok for 10 second snippets of useless AI slop - only momentarily halted by commercials aimed at children is not good for mental health.
They should still allow some chat service for children to communicate - but on a non commercialized platform and not run by malign algorithms
 
Or we could just stick with that 'freedom' thing that's been working out well so far.

Children need to be protected from certain products, services, and life choices. But adults get to make their own decisions.


I'd like to introduce you to a new word:

"technofascism"
 
Ban it. Anything that makes Zuckerberg lose a bunch of money gets my vote. The man and the company he founded are a cancer on society. He's a one of the key figures responsible for the dystopian sh1thole the US has become in the last few years.
 
I was dropping off something at a MIDDLE SCHOOL (oldest would be 15) Friday morning. This was as class was just starting for the day. As I came out the door headed back to my car, EVERY kid had their phone out with their eyes glued to it. I probably could have been dressed as a killer clown and 90% of them probably would have NEVER noticed! 🤡
It's amazing how QUIET restaurants are these days because instead of people talking to each other, they are usually eating with their heads glued into their phones, snapping selfies etc. ;)
 
It's always one thing or the other, dictatorship or freedom. The question is never, why not dismantle those evil corps that hurt society by design and on purpose.
 
It's always one thing or the other, dictatorship or freedom. The question is never, why not dismantle those evil corps that hurt society by design and on purpose.
Probably because most, if not all of them are in bed with their respective governments. Which, of course, things being as they are, means the US government. (Or maybe more accurately, Donald trump).
 
Or we could just stick with that 'freedom' thing that's been working out well so far.

Children need to be protected from certain products, services, and life choices. But adults get to make their own decisions.
Pretty naive to think that we have any real "freedom" in the modern world . And please don't waste your time trying to convince anyone that the 'good ol' USA is any different. Unless you are one of the 1%, just kiss your *** goodbye.
 
You're trying to regulate or control something you can't regulate or control. Makes much more sense to just ban the social media altogether!
 
Interestingly those defending corporations and less regulations in the name of a "free market" and "freedom" are for government enacting more regulations to do the parenting instead of parents, which is a slippery slope towards forcing everyone to hand over an ID to use a computer.

And in the age of AI being put into everything to "protect" us, freedom is just an illusion, especially when more people are being falsely arrested because some AI bot connected to a camera hallucinated an image or license plate.
 
...freedom is just an illusion, especially when more people are being falsely arrested because some AI bot connected to a camera hallucinated an image or license plate.
It's fun to invent fantasy worlds and share them online, isn't it? In the case to which you refer, no AI model "hallucinated" anything, and the woman wasn't arrested because of AI, but because a lazy police investigator broke department regulations and filed for a warrant simply because someone resembled the photo of a suspect.
 
You're trying to regulate or control something you can't regulate or control. Makes much more sense to just ban the social media altogether!
Actually that is quite easy - if you have a requirement of "bank id" which is a login method widely used for "official services" here in Norway - you can limit it as kids below 16 doesn't have access to Bank ID in Norway.
The only limiting factor would be for them to use a VPN, which is of course doable, but not a widely known service for "below 16" in Norway
 
Actually that is quite easy - if you have a requirement of "bank id" which is a login method widely used for "official services" here in Norway - you can limit it as kids below 16 doesn't have access to Bank ID in Norway.
The only limiting factor would be for them to use a VPN, which is of course doable, but not a widely known service for "below 16" in Norway
And now everyone above 16 is no longer anonymous… well done!
 
Back