Claude is the top free app on iPhone right now, and the Pentagon drama is basically why

[Endymio]

Again with the deflection. You know it was done under Bush and that trump is in the files

Biden's Administration leaked that "Trump was in the files" back while the files were sealed. Unfortunately, all those references were as Trump as an innocent witness with no connection to Epstein.

Obama knew of the Epstein case, and refused to allow it to be reopened. Trump instructed his DoD to reopen the case and Epstein to justice. Simple fact. Biden refused to unseal the Epstein files. Trump unsealed them. Again: simple fact. Sell the lies elsewhere.

"The Nazis promoted the powers and rights of labor unions." - and when they came into power they destroyed them all.

Glad you finally admit I was correct! Yes, the Nazis were no different than the Soviets, Chavez' Venezuela, Romania's Partidul Social Democrat, or any other far-Left political party. Once they gain ultimate power and manage to exile, imprison, or execute all their political opposition, they suddenly lose all interest in those fancy Left-wing ideals espoused on their rise upwards.

 

[Puiu]

You spend a significant portion of your life spreading falsehoods about him. But that's modern-day Romania, which "trumps up" false charges, arrests, and imprisons against any political opponent that doesn't espouse far-Left ideology.

"Falsehoods" - I only spoke the truth. When you have 26 women accusing him of SA, trump loosing in court, and a known trusted person (trusted by the FBI in official capacity) accuse him of raping her as a minor in relation with epstein then it's 100% clear that he did it. this scramble by the FBI to hide and burn all of the documents pertaining to trump is an abuse of power of the highest level.

I'm not the one who was bragging about going into the changing room of minors and watching them undress, trump did. It's sickening.

It's sickening.

 

[Puiu]

Biden's Administration leaked that "Trump was in the files" back while the files were sealed. Unfortunately, all those references were as Trump as an innocent witness with no connection to Epstein.

Obama knew of the Epstein case, and refused to allow it to be reopened. Trump instructed his DoD to reopen the case and Epstein to justice. Simple fact. Biden refused to unseal the Epstein files. Trump unsealed them. Again: simple fact. Sell the lies elsewhere.


Glad you finally admit I was correct! Yes, the Nazis were no different than the Soviets, Chavez' Venezuela, Romania's Partidul Social Democrat, or any other far-Left political party. Once they gain ultimate power and manage to exile, imprison, or execute all their political opposition, they suddenly lose all interest in those fancy Left-wing ideals they used to fool their supporters.

No seriously, wtf?

"Glad you finally admit I was correct!" - I just destroyed your entire argument about unions, and here you are now saying that I agree with you? can we please have a logical conversation based on the facts?

"Trump unsealed them." - no he didn't. Congress did it against trump's wishes. it was a forced action. and even so, trump's DOJ is breaking the law by not releasing them (only a portion was released with clear unlawful redactions).

in the end all you did was to somehow defend the far right nazi regime... I don't get you at all.

 

[Endymio]

... a known trusted person (trusted by the FBI in official capacity) accuse him of raping her as a minor in relation with epstein then it's 100% clear that he did it. this scramble by the FBI to hide and burn all of the documents pertaining to trump is an abuse of power of the highest level.

People are lucky Trump doesn't sue European vagrants. The case you're referring to wasn't by a "known FBI trusted person" (whatever that means, LOL), it was by an anonymous person using the pseudonym "Katie Johnson" who filed a civil lawsuit (NOT criminal charges) in 2016 against Trump (using a false address and other false info, no less), and alleging this happened more than 20 years in the past.

When the case was dismissed (by an Obama-appointed California judge), he/she/it then refiled it in a separate court -- then dropped it without pursuing it.

And despite your claims of the "FBI burning all the evidence", this was all reported by numerous news organizations -- back in 2016. Oops.

"Glad you finally admit I was correct!" - I just destroyed your entire argument about unions, and here you are now saying that I agree with you?

You agreed that the Nazis originally espoused and supported the rights of workers and labor unions, but attempted to counter with the claim they ultimately replaced independent unions with their Nazi-aligned union. That doesn't counter my point ... it reinforces it.

You still have yet to claim a single "right wing" ideology the Nazis espoused. Please, claim they were "militaristic", so I can decimate that argument too.

 

[Puiu]

People are lucky Trump doesn't sue European vagrants. The case you're referring to wasn't by a "known FBI trusted person" (whatever that means, LOL), it was by an anonymous person using the pseudonym "Katie Johnson" who filed a civil lawsuit (NOT criminal charges) in 2016 against Trump (using a false address and other false info, no less), and alleging this happened more than 20 years in the past.

When the case was dismissed (by an Obama-appointed California judge), he/she/it then refiled it in a separate court -- then dropped it without pursuing it.

And despite your claims of the "FBI burning all the evidence", this was all reported by numerous news organizations -- back in 2016. Oops.


You agreed that the Nazis originally espoused and supported the rights of workers and labor unions, but attempted to counter with the claim they ultimately replaced independent unions with their Nazi-aligned union. That doesn't counter my point ... it reinforces it.

You still have yet to claim a single "right wing" ideology the Nazis espoused. Please, claim they were "militaristic", so I can decimate that argument too.

"You agreed that the Nazis originally espoused and supported the rights of workers and labor unions, but attempted to counter with the claim they ultimately replaced independent unions with their Nazi-aligned union. That doesn't counter my point ... it reinforces it." -

1. I never agreed. you are making zero sense.
2. the nazi NEVER supported unions, it was just propaganda. the nazi always intended to destroy the unions and that's exactly what they did. there is no such thing as "nazi aligned unions". independent unions were destroyed (people in unions were killed!) and in their place the nazi made the German Labour Front (which isn't a union).

learn some real history for once: https://apwu.org/news/magazine-labo...ay-1933-dissolution-labor-unions-nazifascist/

You just killed your own argument with this and somehow you simply don't understand why you failed.

"You still have yet to claim a single "right wing" ideology the Nazis espoused." - I gave you a million examples, you somehow forgot. I gave you from how they were formed, leader quotes and philosophy, and policies they enacted (the real ones, not the ones you made up).

Nazi is far right and no matter how much you try to say otherwise. This is a historical FACT. I know some people have a hard time accepting facts, but you cannot deny reality forever. All you are doing is showing to the world that you want to rewrite history because it's "inconvenient" for you and your god trump.

It's insane to me that people exist who think the nazis were from the left. It's simply crazy to see people try to rewrite history with debunked disinformation.

Why do you go to such lengths to support known pedophiles like trump?

why did you cut this quote in a million pieces? "Nazism ideologically opposed "unearned income" as "parasitic" or "rent slavery"

Did you think I wouldn't check if it's real or not? After all the lies you've told me so far?