1. TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users. Ask a question and give support. Join the community here.
    TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users.
    Ask a question and give support.
    Join the community here, it only takes a minute.
    Dismiss Notice

EA creating free Battlefield game sans cartoony graphics

By Matthew ยท 46 replies
Nov 8, 2010
Post New Reply
  1. Building on the success of its free-to-play first-person shooter, Battlefield Heroes, EA has announced plans to release a new freebie. Simply called "Battlefield Play4Free," the game will shed Battlefield Heroes' cartoonish graphics in favor of the grittier style seen in popular retail Battlefield titles -- and that's not all it borrows from EA's previous work.

    Read the whole story
  2. killamoves

    killamoves TS Rookie Posts: 18

    Graphics don't seem so great I wonder what the requirements are.
  3. Ranger12

    Ranger12 TS Evangelist Posts: 620   +122

    Alright, it basically combines the two best games in the battlefield series. Sounds like it'll be good
  4. ---agissi---

    ---agissi--- TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,929   +15

    Wow now this looks awesome! Im glad I registered for Heros even though I only played it once, it looks like it helped them realize they could have a following. BF2 probably my third favorite PC game of all time, I thought the gameplay was tight.
  5. lawfer

    lawfer TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,270   +91

    This is a bit old. I saw this a few days ago at Ars Technica.

    Well, sadly, the graphics look mediocre. I love Battlefield 2, but they should have used Battlefield Bad Company 2's graphics. I guess as long as the gameplay remains a mix of both games, it should be a good game. And it's free, so what the hell.
  6. razzrap

    razzrap TS Rookie

    free games for the win!
  7. codefeenix

    codefeenix TS Rookie Posts: 39

    Hopefully they balance paying users and free users a whole lot better than they did for BF: Heroes.

    TechSpot article says i should expect 32 player slots from a BF title. This is incorrect, as I expect 64.
  8. KG363

    KG363 TS Guru Posts: 523   +15

    I can't wait. I signed up this weekend
  9. Xclusiveitalian

    Xclusiveitalian TS Evangelist Posts: 782   +163

    "P4F will scale up to 32 players"
    You mean scale down, BF2 had 64, and the Korean version of this game i heard has 100+
  10. Relic

    Relic TechSpot Chancellor Posts: 1,372   +17

    The game will be free to play so toned down graphics and 32 player limit is understandable. I might give this a try but I'm not sure how much time I would spend with it as I'm happy with BF:BC2 and eagerly awaiting BF3.
  11. princeton

    princeton TS Addict Posts: 1,674

    Wow. Someone obviously has only played those 2 games. 1942 was by far the best battlefield game...
  12. JMMD

    JMMD TechSpot Chancellor Posts: 840   +6

    Never played "heroes" but I'm all for more F2P multiplayer games. Just hope the cheating doesn't ruin it too much.
  13. klepto12

    klepto12 TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,116   +13

    F2P multiplayer games have been a dime a dozen and its hard to find one that is great but i hope this one is and can change my mind about other F2P games.
  14. mpribe

    mpribe TS Enthusiast Posts: 31

    I'm guessing that the graphics don't look great because they are targeting this game at a wide range of PC players.

    I grew up a PC gamer and recently decided to buy back into the platform after a stint on the Xbox 360. When I got the Xbox, I reasoned that most big releases were going to be cross-platform, and that the console provided the cheapest way to access those titles. I hoped that the decline in PC gaming (which I lamented) would lead to an increase in the diversity and creativity of games coming out on consoles.

    Needless to say, I was disappointed in that regard. Console games, for the most part, are published by large corporations which impose burdensome restrictions on developers and hold a disdainful view of their customer base. Look at the recent MOH release, for example. EA rushed that game to be out before the new COD, and it shows. When confronted with the shortcomings of the game, one EA exec dismissed such concerns, saying that the game was fine for most of the market, and that the only people who don't like it are those who spend "80 to 90 hours a week playing shooters." In short, he is saying that he doesn't care if they put out a bad game so long as they sell millions of copies to unsuspecting casual players. Those players pay their $60 up front, and it doesn't matter whether the continue playing the game. Of course, the highly structured nature of the console gaming market makes this possible.

    My hope is that free to play gaming will help spark a renaissance in PC games. Such a business model is, of course, impossible on consoles where Microsoft wants money up front for every game. Indeed, they don't want this business model to succeed because it means that game developers will be forced to put out quality games and to maintain and update them on a regular basis; if gamers have a wide range of free games to play, they are going to play whichever ones are the best and have the best support.

    I'm glad to see that Dice hasn't forgotten about the PC market. They have, in the past, continually talked about how they can't just port the console versions of their games over to PC and call it a day the way Activision does. Hopefully this new Battlefield game will get the type of investment it needs to succeed under this business model. And hopefully it will show Activision how important it is to patch your game! Modern Warfare 2 only got patches for the most game-breakingly obvious bugs or imbalances. But there have been several bugs or imbalanced weapons that have never been patched, even though one would think that patching your game is a BASIC necessity in a competitive market.

    I'll gladly spend $60 or more on a game over time if it is good. I probably spent about $80 on League of Legends this summer. But I shouldn't have to pay $60 up front just to find out a game isn't good or that I don't like it and never play it again. I'm not some spoiled gamer who wants everything for free; I'll gladly pay for good content and reward developers who show me the respect of putting out a balanced, intelligent game.
  15. TeamworkGuy2

    TeamworkGuy2 TS Enthusiast Posts: 190

    This should be quite interesting. I played Battlefield 2 for a while, and liked it, although a lot of the servers were getting empty. It will be interesting to see how payments are incorporated into the game. If paying players get a lot of overpowered extras, it could be the downfall of the game.
  16. ColdFusion1990

    ColdFusion1990 TS Rookie Posts: 124

    I'm so excited to get back into Battlefield 2
  17. dustin_ds3000

    dustin_ds3000 TechSpot Chancellor Posts: 880   +20

    this looks fun, to bad i will be in basic training when this comes out.
  18. ryan29121

    ryan29121 TS Booster Posts: 174

    The Battlefield franchise has been my favorite over the years. I am glad they are making a free to play modern warfare style game. It should be successful.
  19. Wagan8r

    Wagan8r TS Evangelist Posts: 605   +67

    I tried Battlefield Heroes, but it didn't quite fit my style of game. Bad Company 2, however, is probably my favorite shooter right now. I'll try this out when it's released, but I'm really holding out for Battlefield 3.

    For those saying that the graphics are bad or that they should have used the Bad Company 2 engine, they simply can't due to the "few" people who would be able to play it. Those who can afford to buy a game, can afford a decent GPU. Making it free means that anybody can play it if he wants. For a free game, the more demanding you make the requirements, the more narrow your audience becomes.
  20. Ranger12

    Ranger12 TS Evangelist Posts: 620   +122

    Ok I played 1942 for a bit. Im just not a big fan of the WWII games.... In my opinion BF2 and BC2 were the best. Anyway, would love to see em bring back 64 players.
  21. jurrasstoil

    jurrasstoil TS Rookie Posts: 27

    I prefer good gameplay mechanics and balanced classes over fancy graphics.
    Counter-Strike is hideous, but still popular.

    I hope they manage to find a decent balance between the paying and non-paying hardcore and casual gamers.

    IAMTHESTIG TS Evangelist Posts: 1,682   +773

    Looks strikingly similar to BF2. I played that game for hours and hours, was loads of fun. This looks interesting... i'll probably try it out.

    I somehow doubt but would love to see LAN support for this. One of the thing that really gets me worked up is how EA/Dice is no longer putting LAN support in their games. People still have LAN parties you know! I personally bought the game and was disappointed when I saw no LAN. I still play online, but you can't expect 12 people at a LAN to join some online server through one internet connection when you could potentially just play on the LAN. You have no control, no one locally is hosting the game.
  23. ---agissi---

    ---agissi--- TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,929   +15

    Same here. USAF basic Nov.16th. The graphics look better than BF2s I thought. With the gun fire flares and everything coming out of the guns. And 32 player maps is pretty impressive for a free game. I was glad it wasnt 16. 64 is quite wild though I must say. Thats what made the original Battlefield 1942 so cool. Plus the variety of vehicles, which is also included in this.
  24. ---agissi---

    ---agissi--- TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,929   +15

    You should be able to develop a tunneling program with some skills. Called BattleLAN it was done for WC3 despite its built in support. I remember my father saying they just made a tunnel and played that way. Similar to how I think Zone.com used to make their online gaming host site work. It was a Microsoft supported online gaming site and we'd play Warcraft 2 online which didnt have Battle.NET at the time. Just to stem some thought..
  25. DSparil

    DSparil TS Rookie Posts: 35

    So it's like Battle.net, except that it's less popular.

    This is the new trend that pc games are going into to combat piracy. Starcraft 2 was quite successful with this new gimmick. More will soon follow this trend in the coming months.

    Next thing you'll hear is EA suing people for placing private servers.

    The software business is good nowadays.

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...