EA reveals the minimum PC specs for Battlefield 5

"
The FX-6350 is significantly slower then a core i5 2500k in games. It's per core performance is worse then phenom II, about on par with first generation core 2 quads. And that FX only has 3 FPUs, and unless specifically coded for, has WORSE FPU performance then a sandy bridge i3 depending on the game engine.

The i5 6600K and FX-6350 are on completely different fields of performance, its like claiming a 3.7 GHz core i3 kaby lake and a 3.8 GHz pentium D are the same performance wise because they have the same number of cores and GHz, or writing game requirements as "ryzen 7 1700 or core 2 duo e5600".

The i5 6600K is much more comparable to a ryzen 5 chip then a FX.

You missunderstand, maybe FX performance per thread is way slower than i5 but, that FX still having 6 Threads and that i5 has 4 and slower clocks, BF games uses up to 6 threads, then, that FX-6350 could have the same overall performance on this Game

Greetings
 
Back