Early DLSS 4 test showcases cleaner images and multiplied framerates

[Haaky]

But what kills me is, If these cards are suppose to be so fast. Then my do we need any type of frame generation? Or fake frames as I like to call them.

Shouldn't the raw horsepower of these so called "fast" cards be enough to handle the graphics thrown at them?
Apparently not. Sound like a bunch of BS to me.

A 5070ti card is as fast as a 4090. Not bloody likely. Sure if you throw a bunch of fake, make believe frames at it. Just another scam to separate you from your money.
Its all corporate greed, nothing else

 

[kiwigraeme]

Not my comments saw on YT

How much effort is Nvidia going to pull into AI learning each game.
probably great open world non -twitch games

In fast twitch games with rapid camera angle changes to look for enemies how will AI predict where a player will suddenly look

People want the most agnostic solution that the community itself can build, they can be applied to all relevant games

 

[WhiteLeaff]

A big propaganda, the advantage of running at high framerate is the much lower latency there's no point in this higher number on the screen when the real performance is below 60fps as well as the latency

 

[Macar]

I'm not a FPS competitive gamer, and I hate latency.

 

[Revolution 11]

Didn’t realize most people want a GPU that’s 5 slots wide, chugs 1000W, and doubles as a central heating system for the entire house. And here I was, thinking Nvidia, the leader in AI, should actually keep pushing their AI-driven tech like DLSS forward. Nope, my bad. Totally missed the memo. Perhaps AMD has a better plan.

How much Nvidia stock do you have?

 

[manowar51]

Just remember, the reason why Nvidia beats AMD every single year is because Nvidia spends billions more on R&D than AMD does. 8 billion vs 5 billion last year to be precise. Of course AMD makes even more billions in profits so it's not like they are short on cash for R&D, they would just have to give up a higher percentage of their profits to match them and potentially compete.

 

[HardwareHunt365]

How much Nvidia stock do you have?

What exactly does this have to do with the topic being discussed? The bias is showing, and this isn’t the first time someone tries to derail the conversation when I make a valid point. If AMD works for you, by all means, stick with it while Nvidia forges ahead.

 

[yRaz]

What exactly does this have to do with the topic being discussed? The bias is showing, and this isn’t the first time someone tries to derail the conversation when I make a valid point. If AMD works for you, by all means, stick with it while Nvidia forges ahead.

Could you clarify the valid point you were attempting to make?

 

[HardwareHunt365]

Could you clarify the valid point you were attempting to make?

Maybe, learn to read?

 

[Manoa]

Just remember, the reason why Nvidia beats AMD every single year is because Nvidia spends billions more on R&D than AMD does. 8 billion vs 5 billion last year to be precise. Of course AMD makes even more billions in profits so it's not like they are short on cash for R&D, they would just have to give up a higher percentage of their profits to match them and potentially compete.

that is correct, I would only add: AMD use most of the R&D on hardware engineering, but nvidea use it also for software, if AMD rebalanced their money and put more of it on software, they could at least fix most of they problems with drivers and who knows mybe some of it could be left for features development....(that being said: FSR 4 is very impressive), the problem is even though their money is now good with the CPU leadership, they are still a battle on 2 fronts (CPU and video cards), so the money for development already has to be split in 2
and then you need money for software also that is the problem

 

[PurpleYoda]

Clearly emotions are running high because let’s face it, deep down we all would like a miracle product but have been burned too many times to let ourselves believe in miracles..

Let’s just wait and see when the cards are actually out, in the hands of reviewers and reserve our comments until then. We simply don’t have enough information to make any informed conclusions yet ;-)

 

[loki1944]

No thanks; I'll stick to native for a far superior image; this stuff should be called de-resolution; not super resolution.

 

[dipique]

"Cyberpunk 2077 in DLSS performance mode added approximately 10 milliseconds of lag. However, the accompanying 60 percent increase in framerate easily outweighed the delay"
Depends on the game and who is playing it.
Competitive gamers are not excited about more latency.

I hear people say this constantly, but competitive gamers typically play at 1080p with graphics optimized for contrast instead of prettiness. In other words, they don't *need* this feature. And they don't need to use it.

 

[dipique]

A big propaganda, the advantage of running at high framerate is the much lower latency there's no point in this higher number on the screen when the real performance is below 60fps as well as the latency

This is a common misconception. The TWO main advantages of high FPS are reduced latency and temporal fidelity. This feature drastically increases temporal fidelity with a minor cost to spatial fidelity and latency.

Only you can decide whether this trade-off is worthwhile. For me, it depends on the game. Wouldn't use it on a moba, but for Indiana Jones it's perfect.