In truth, people that think success, hard work and dedication is for pricks, are the real life pricks.
Yes, natural thread progression seem lost on TS.
I see the "my purpose is to have Musk's baby" brigade infestation has begun.
You are correct - its all about work ethics; in both the work output for pay as well as the desire to do good. The work ethics of Twitter were always questionable; hence the cleaning of the stables approach adopted by Musk. Yes, if you think that you should work for a company whose work ethics do not match your work ethics - don't; since you will be found out an fired and it will bad on your resume- all that hiring and firing. My opinion as a person who has had to hire and fire many technical people: don't hire anyone that has been fired by Musk; you will have an 80% chance of having to fire them when your expectation of work performance from them are not met. Of course I only worked for high performance ethical companies; so you would need to go elsewhere for the opinion of low performance companies.
Agree. Its what I used to call the "hard truth" about individual survival in Western Society - if you want to assure yourself of the benefits you must put in the effort. Unfortunately is follows the 80/20 rule. There are 20% of people that survive without putting in the effort. It is disappointing in the 21st century that 50% of new adults seem intent on being part of the 20% - talk about a lack of STEM education - 50 into 20 does not fit.
That boat sailed a while ago; and 50% of new adults jumped on board. The race is now to the BIGGEST LOSER not merely a LOSER.
They're a private company sweaty, they can do what they want. If you dont like it go make your own twitter!
Remote workers are going to figure out real quick, if they want to stay remote, they are going to be in a very big pool of employees that work for very little. And I just want to say I CALLED IT, remote work was not permanent and never will be.
You need to define who these "people" are that you are talking about; for this comment to make any sense. Most of the people in the world have never heard of Musk (even in his birth country). I think of him as a "hero" if you will; but I do it from a businessman's perspective (that part of me that understands successful business in our world. So are you talking about "people" being those educated and experienced in successful business?
See my previous post on here and remember Twitter stocks were tanking when Musk purchased it.
Might I point out that you keep using the same link to a collection of monetized youtube videos that are all from the same period roughly a year ago that are all critical of Musk. Critique is the cornerstone of a functional debate as well as the basis of the scientific method, though that critique begins to wither in potency when it can easily be shown to be a mechanism of profit. One of the channels in the short list you linked seems to have come into existence entirely to base a business model on rage bait regarding Musk as evidenced by its content, time of creation and transparent monetization.
A lot of these rich people were born with all the advantages of the world at their disposal, or inherited wealth from their parents. Only a small number rose from humble beginnings.
The third reply down on Quora by Jeremy Arnold was the generally accepted rights of this until it became fashionable to propagate the myth surrounding the childhood of Tesla's leader. Other Journalists have dug into the past of Errol Musk and have come away with the same publicly available records of his time in council and his affiliations at the time. Government records are generally a great source for determining the rights of things down the road as very few people are interested in digging through municipal or regional government meeting minutes to misrepresent their contents as such their content tends to be un molested.
Both sides?
Did you even read the massive bickering melt above my post?
