What you are defining is not "free speech", rather you are defining "regulated speech" or "privileged speech". It's a common fault many Europeans make when trying to claim they have free speech comparable to Americas.
When your government determines what you can or cannot say, you do not have free speech either. That is what Twitter was doing before Musk bought it, and there were many a rich guy who were making decisions on what was allowed on twitter. You also ignore that the reason Musk, and many others, were banned on twitter was because a rich guy disagreed with them on whatever subject they may have cared about.
Hypocrisy isnt a good look.
You guys need to get your Musk Derangement Syndrome checked out. When it was social media denying the Chinese or the Russian access to data, you had no issue and even cheered on their actions.
Fighting government overreach is a good thing, actually.