1. TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users. Ask a question and give support. Join the community here.
    TechSpot is dedicated to computer enthusiasts and power users.
    Ask a question and give support.
    Join the community here, it only takes a minute.
    Dismiss Notice

Facebook addresses facial recognition fears, will stop scanning faces by default

By Polycount ยท 5 replies
Sep 3, 2019
Post New Reply
  1. These practices have resulted in Facebook being slapped with a class-action lawsuit (which was recently granted permission to proceed by the US Appeals Court). Now, the company has finally taken measures to address user concerns. This decision was announced in a somewhat confusingly-worded blog post, so we'll try to tackle some of the core points here.

    For starters, Facebook says that, previously, it only used facial recognition technology for the "tag suggestions" feature, which scans photos for your friends' faces, and suggests you tag them if you wish (manual tagging has always been an option, too).

    Later, in December 2017, the company introduced a broader "face recognition" settings option for "some people." This switch not only let you switch on or off tag suggestions, but also other uses of face recognition across Facebook. Some of these uses include fraud and identity theft prevention, as well as accessibility features.

    Beginning today, Facebook claims that anyone who still had the tag suggestions setting up to this point will be shown a notification that lets them opt-in (or out) of the more comprehensive face recognition setting. If you do nothing (by not responding to the notice) or you only ever had the face recognition setting in the first place (if you've newly joined Facebook, for example), you'll now be opted-out of these features by default.

    Tying into these updates, Facebook is also making improvements to the face recognition settings interface itself. Moving forward, it will include clear information that describes how the technology works when it's on, what sort of data it collects, and more -- as well as on and off buttons, of course.

    It remains to be seen whether or not these changes will be enough to dissuade Facebook's class-action opponents from going after the tech giant.

    Permalink to story.

  2. p51d007

    p51d007 TS Evangelist Posts: 2,056   +1,319

    YOU have to "opt in"...but that doesn't mean Fakebook won't "scan" the data and use it for whatever they want to use it for.
    ShagnWagn and seeprime like this.
  3. QuantumPhysics

    QuantumPhysics TS Evangelist Posts: 1,581   +1,178

    You opt in the moment you get tagged in a photo by yourself or someone else.
  4. Uncle Al

    Uncle Al TS Evangelist Posts: 5,680   +4,025

    I equate this to taping of a phone ... unless the parties can obtain an order from a Federal Judge, it should be totally illegal without exception ...
    ShagnWagn likes this.
  5. Puiu

    Puiu TS Evangelist Posts: 3,571   +2,051

    They already have another source for this and they already have a big enough database to train AI's for decades.
  6. ShagnWagn

    ShagnWagn TS Guru Posts: 837   +642

    No doubt the government(s) have direct access to their facial recognition, and most likely maintain their own, live, backup copies of it.

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...