GeoHot donates funds for Sony’s PS3 hacking lawsuit to EFF

By Emil · 12 replies
Apr 18, 2011
Post New Reply
  1. PlayStation 3 jailbreaker George Hotz, also known as GeoHot, has donated the remaining funds for his legal battle against Sony to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). He also says the battle with the PS3 will continue with or without him as others will continue to crack the latest firmware and find workarounds for the console:

    Read the whole story
  2. How much are legal fees in a case like this? How much did Geohot have to pay for his lawyers?
  3. Wendig0

    Wendig0 TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,136   +131

    I still feel like Geo sold out, but I think that corporate lackey "judge" would have granted Sony Geo's first born if they asked for it. The judge was obviously in their pocket, so perhaps Geo did the right thing by settling and turning it over to the EFF?
  4. Anyone have a guess has to how much he had to settle for?

    $20,000?? $50,000??
  5. Vrmithrax

    Vrmithrax TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,352   +293

    I think just getting it to court and the widespread media showing Sony's true colors counts it as a win for Geo, really. Even though he had to back down and settle (as Wendig0 points out, he didn't have much of a chance), Sony still got a public relations black eye from the battle.
  6. NeoFryBoy

    NeoFryBoy TS Rookie Posts: 72

    He probably didn't lose money. Sony grabbed everything they wanted, and banned him from touching another Sony product for life (most likely). And he thinks Sony got owned...?
  7. Dont mess with SONY Geo (goon)!!!
  8. madboyv1

    madboyv1 TechSpot Paladin Posts: 1,471   +375

    That last paragraph is kind of dumb. He won't publically admit of the possiblitiy that he'll do anything with Sony hardware in the future. At least he donated the money he had collected for legal costs.
  9. It's funny how he say that he respects the courts and the laws yet he have been hacking the PS3 which is not allowed. I don't have anything against the homebrew crowd but he acts like he can do whatever he wishes even when he bought the PS3 and agreed with the terms. If he does not agree with the terms of the PS3 then he should not have bought the PS3 in the first place. At the same time SONY took it too far too.

    For the most of us we only bough the system to play games as that's what it's sold as so we don't really care for this case as much. We bought the game system to play games. That's it and that's what we agreed with. If you bought the system for other reasons they just be careful but don't get mad when you get in trouble. It's like buying a phone then bricking it and complaining to the company when that happens.
  10. gwailo247

    gwailo247 TechSpot Chancellor Posts: 2,010   +18

    Wait till Sony starts cross-referencing the data he (was forced/willingly gave to Sony to avoid pound-in-the-*** Federal prison, take your pick) against PS3 players. Then a whole lot of people are going to get OWND. Then he got behind the Anonymous attack, which basically just screwed over more PS3 players. How else is he going to "help" the PS3 community? Write some viruses to turn them into a botnet?

    Thanks for seeing this thing through bro. Your rhetoric was mighty tough indeed, right up to the point you had to face any repercussions, then you folded faster than a protein on a supercomputer.
  11. Lionvibez

    Lionvibez TS Evangelist Posts: 1,266   +436

    lol you say that like he had a chance. Do you think he could have afforded a Multi million dollar lawsuit for years in court. When sony already had the judge in their pocket, if anything he did a smart thing and saved his ***. If any of you thought he was doing it for you or the community you are damn naive and I got some beach front property in Alaska to sell you.

    Money trumps all in this world and in the legal system most of you should know this by now.
  12. You don't have to agree to any terms to PURCHASE a PS3. The hardware is yours once purchased. There may be terms to agree to in your initial use of the hardware, but initial ownership doesn't involve any. That being said, if he never walked through dialogues and clicked 'Agree' then he didn't agree to any either.
  13. All of this crap could have been completely avoided if they didn't ban use of Linux kits.
    They should just brick systems from PSN access if they detect hacks. Who cares offline what happens.
    They promote video sharing through external sources as a main feature of their system, which most people obtain illegally, so it's funny that way too.

Similar Topics

Add your comment to this article

You need to be a member to leave a comment. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate.
TechSpot Account You may also...