Google engineer arrested for using internal search data to win $1.2 million on Polymarket

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,012   +59
Staff
What just happened? A federal case unfolding in New York shows what can happen when someone with access to company secrets decides to test their luck on prediction markets. Michele Spagnuolo, a Google engineer who'd been with the firm for over a decade, allegedly used his access to internal data to place bets on Polymarket – and it worked extremely well. The 12-year veteran of Google's information security team now faces federal charges of commodities fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering.

Spagnuolo, an Italian citizen who lives in Switzerland, was arrested on Wednesday and hauled before a federal judge in New York. Prosecutors say he made roughly $1.2 million by betting on outcomes he already knew.

The scheme centered on Google's annual "Year in Search" report, which tracks the most searched topics and people. Spagnuolo had access to that data before it went public and allegedly used it to inform his trades on Polymarket, a crypto-based prediction platform where people bet on everything from election outcomes to pop culture trends.

"Unlike the counterparties to his trades, Spagnuolo knew the outcome of these wagers before the trading public did because he had accessed Google's confidential, commercially valuable internal data," prosecutors wrote in the criminal complaint.

Between mid-October and early December 2025, Spagnuolo placed around $2.7 million in bets on who would top Google's search rankings. He went heavy on "no" bets for obvious names like Donald Trump and Bianca Censori while putting money on d4vd, a musician whose odds were near zero. When Google released the Year in Search results in December, those bets paid off handsomely.

What makes this case particularly awkward for Google is that Spagnuolo didn't hack anything. He used tools that all employees could access. The company confirmed as much in a statement, saying he "accessed our marketing material using a tool available to all employees, but using such confidential information to place bets is a serious breach of our policies." Google has placed him on leave and says it's cooperating with investigators.

The bets were placed through an account called "AlphaRaccoon" on Polymarket, and they didn't go unnoticed. By early December, people on Discord and X started speculating that whoever was behind the account had inside information, as the betting patterns were just too precise. Shortly after the chatter picked up, the "AlphaRaccoon" username disappeared, reverting to a generic alphanumeric wallet address.

That username change didn't help much. Polymarket runs on blockchain technology, which means every transaction is permanently recorded and traceable. That helped authorities track him down.

"Blockchain trading is transparent, traceable, and bad actors leave footprints," a Polymarket spokesperson said.

The FBI pieced it together by analyzing blockchain records, reviewing documents from Polymarket, and checking records from cryptocurrency service providers. The key link came from a crypto account that Spagnuolo had opened using his Italian government ID. That account funneled money to the wallet that funded the AlphaRaccoon bets.

After the wagers paid out, the account received more than $3.9 million in USDC.e, a stablecoin tied to the US dollar. From there, over $5 million moved back through intermediary wallets. Some of that extra cash appears to have come from other profitable Polymarket trades, though prosecutors haven't specified which ones.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has also filed a civil complaint against Spagnuolo, seeking to recover his profits and impose financial penalties. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig said the case "underscores our commitment to rooting out insider trading and promoting market integrity in prediction markets."

If convicted on the criminal charges, Spagnuolo could face up to 50 years in prison, though any sentence would be determined by a judge. He's been released on a $2.25 million bond.

Permalink to story:

 
Here's an interesting question: Would they have arrested him for losing? What does that tell you?
Would only tell us he sucked at using advantageous data to place bets. Or that he planned to lose.

But man, how do these supposedly smart people not pepper in some losses or other deflections into their supernatural lucky bets to help throw off accusations?
Well, I guess that question is for those that got caught lol
 
There were rumors about guys at Google being smart.
Obviously just rumors.
The smart engineers at Google passed on this information to a friend, who made the bets and split the profits with them.

Don't you dare to cheat the market, you filthy phlebs!!!
- US Political Elites who do daily insider trading
Insider trading isn't nearly as problematic as when politicians alter their stances on legislation to make even larger profits. One famous example, Nancy Pelosi -- who entered politics dirt poor and exits worth $150M -- used her Speaker position to take a strong public stance against a bill benefiting Visa/Mastcard, while her trader husband took up large options positions. Then she reversed herself, supported and helped pass the bill, and the stock skyrocketed.

It's illegal to profit off of insider information. Profit is the keyword there.
Nope. Whether you win or lose, it's still illegal under SEC regulations and federal law. See n 17 C.F.R. § 240.
 
Insider trading isn't nearly as problematic as when politicians alter their stances on legislation to make even larger profits. One famous example, Nancy Pelosi -- who entered politics dirt poor and exits worth $150M -- used her Speaker position to take a strong public stance against a bill benefiting Visa/Mastcard, while her trader husband took up large options positions. Then she reversed herself, supported and helped pass the bill, and the stock skyrocketed.
Oh come on! Be fair. Insider trading and allegations of such affect politicians regardless of party or political office held.
For instance - https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/is-trump-illegally-profiting-from-stock-trades-229bcd
And I suggest that's only the tip of the iceberg.

Note I am not saying that it is legal or ethical for any politician, regardless of party or office held, to engage in such.
 
Last edited:
The smart engineers at Google passed on this information to a friend, who made the bets and split the profits with them.


Insider trading isn't nearly as problematic as when politicians alter their stances on legislation to make even larger profits. One famous example, Nancy Pelosi -- who entered politics dirt poor and exits worth $150M -- used her Speaker position to take a strong public stance against a bill benefiting Visa/Mastcard, while her trader husband took up large options positions. Then she reversed herself, supported and helped pass the bill, and the stock skyrocketed.


Nope. Whether you win or lose, it's still illegal under SEC regulations and federal law. See n 17 C.F.R. § 240.
I haven't looked into these claims at all so I can't verify them, but according to this there are a number of insanely timed trades: https://www.celebritynetworth.com/articles/celebrity/nancy-pelosi-stock-trades/
In July 2024, the Pelosis sold 5,000 shares of Microsoft for approximately $2.2 million. A few months later, the Federal Trade Commission announced an antitrust investigation into the tech giant.

Just weeks earlier, Paul Pelosi had also offloaded 2,000 shares of Visa, worth an estimated $525,000, less than three months before the company was hit with a Department of Justice monopoly lawsuit. The stock dropped following the news. That sale came nearly two years after Pelosi made a similarly timed exit from Alphabet stock ahead of another antitrust lawsuit — part of a long-standing pattern of selling before bad headlines hit.

Then, in January 2025, the Pelosis bought call options in Tempus AI, a relatively unknown artificial intelligence healthcare firm. Months later, Tempus inked a $200 million deal with AstraZeneca, and its stock price doubled. Around the same time, the couple also acquired call options in Vistra, an energy company whose stock rose after announcing a $1.9 billion natural gas acquisition deal tied to rising U.S. power demand.

These were not the first suspiciously timed investments. In past years, Paul Pelosi bought Nvidia stock ahead of the CHIPS Act vote, acquired Tesla options before a federal EV push, and made moves in Apple, Amazon, and Alphabet around key moments in Congress. But 2024 brought a surge in volume, dollar value, and profitability that went beyond prior years — setting the stage for a record-breaking portfolio run.

By any measure, 2024 was a phenomenal year for Paul and Nancy Pelosi's investment portfolio. According to newly filed disclosures and third-party analysis from Quiver Quantitative, the couple allegedly added between $7.8 million and $42.5 million to their net worth in a single year. Their estimated portfolio return for 2024? A staggering 54%, more than double the S&P 500's 25% and higher than every major hedge fund, according to Bloomberg's end-of-year rankings.
 
I haven't looked into these claims at all so I can't verify them, but according to this there are a number of insanely timed trades: https://www.celebritynetworth.com/articles/celebrity/nancy-pelosi-stock-trades/
 
Nope. Whether you win or lose, it's still illegal under SEC regulations and federal law. See n 17 C.F.R. § 240.

Ding ding ding! We have a winner!
Selective enforcement is an insidious tool. If they're not going to prosecute every violation, they shouldn't prosecute any of them, and if it's impractical to do so, that law cannot be fairly enforced. Stop skimming the betting site and shut it down. Anything less is an intentional non-solution.
 
The smart engineers at Google passed on this information to a friend, who made the bets and split the profits with them.
LOL OK, that's a tiny bit less stupid, but still ... Google is spying on everyone, these guys should know how easy it is to connect the dots.
 
Ding ding ding! We have a winner!
Selective enforcement is an insidious tool. If they're not going to prosecute every violation, they shouldn't prosecute any .... Stop skimming the betting site and shut it down. Anything less is an intentional non-solution.
It's not selective enforcement, it's simply easier to detect winners than losers, particularly when you win multiple long-odds bets. But if you file a whistleblower complaint with the SEC for insider trading, they'll prosecute: win, lose, or draw.

Nor does the prevalence of inside traders conflate to a requirement to shut down any betting site. The majority of bets on those sites are ones for which inside knowledge isn't available, and for the rest -- caveat emptor. The invisible hand of the market will handle the problem.
 
Last edited:
I don't follow (or participate in) prediction markets, I had no idea they had official status as regulated markets. They certainly don't feel like securities in the traditional sense to me. How/when did the SEC gain jurisdiction?
 
I don't follow (or participate in) prediction markets, I had no idea they had official status as regulated markets. They certainly don't feel like securities in the traditional sense to me. How/when did the SEC gain jurisdiction?
Not only do they (claim to) have jurisdiction, but they are taking states to court claiming that the states have no regulatory authority. Since these prediction markets can be used to bet on anything (including sports and elections), the politics around them is only going to get more, shall way say, interesting.
 
The username "AlphaRaccoon" on a crypto prediction market is doing so much character work here. This is a 12-year Google security engineer, someone whose entire professional identity is built around understanding how people get caught... and he picked a memorable animal alias, traded in patterns so obvious that random people on Discord noticed within weeks, and apparently forgot that the entire value proposition of the blockchain he was using is that it never forgets anything. Incredible.
 
Amazing...a google employee gets busted for making millions.
But on the other hand, our "elected officials", that make no more than $200k per year,
while maintaining a residence in the home district, while living in one of the more expensive
areas of the country (DC area) somehow turn into millionaires within a few years after being
elected. Gee, wonder how THAT works. ;)
 
“ If convicted on the criminal charges, Spagnuolo could face up to 50 years in prison, though any sentence would be determined by a judge. He's been released on a $2.25 million bond.”

He can try and make some of that money back by betting on how long he’s going to prison.
 
It's not selective enforcement, it's simply easier to detect winners than losers, particularly when you win multiple long-odds bets. But if you file a whistleblower complaint with the SEC for insider trading, they'll prosecute: win, lose, or draw.

Nor does the prevalence of inside traders conflate to a requirement to shut down any betting site. The majority of bets on those sites are ones for which inside knowledge isn't available, and for the rest -- caveat emptor. The invisible hand of the market will handle the problem.

Losers have nothing to seize and don't make for catchy headlines.
 
But man, how do these supposedly smart people not pepper in some losses or other deflections into their supernatural lucky bets to help throw off accusations?
Well, I guess that question is for those that got caught lol
Plenty of possible answers.
1) They're not actually smart. There's tons of people in high positions that get there simply by being abrasive. Some people are experts at bullshitting their way up even when they're not very intelligent.
2) They could be a massive narcissist, in their view they deserve it and everyone else is too dumb to put things together anyway
3) Laziness/complacency. Ironically a lot of people that are up to no good don't actually get better at what they're doing over time - they get sloppier instead. Take care to cover their tracks at the start but find it to be a hassle and no one seems to be looking anyway (human laziness can explain a surprising amount of things in the world).
 
I haven't looked into these claims at all so I can't verify them, but according to this there are a number of insanely timed trades: https://www.celebritynetworth.com/articles/celebrity/nancy-pelosi-stock-trades/

Not defending the Pelosis (or insider trading) but buying Nvidia stock around the time of the CHIPS Act vote doesn't seem suspicious at all. The CHIPS Act was in the works for months (and was the combo of two preceeding pieces of legislation, the first of which dated back to 2019), and the Act itself had broad, bipartisan support and passed with a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate.

Some of these trades are undoubtedly suspicious. The others could easily be chalked up to common sense decisions made by any broker who has access to the internet and simply pays attention to the prevailing economic and political trends. Buying Nvidia or Tesla on an upswing (which then continues post-governmental action or inaction) is hardly evidence of Nancy coming home and talking shop with her husband (in those specific instances, not necessarily the others).

And to be fair, the comparison to the S&P and major hedge funds is purposefully misleading. It's far harder for an index or a hedge fund with AUM of hundreds of millions to billions of dollars to have a return of 54%, simply because the amount of money being invested is greater than what the Pelosis are working with. It's akin to saying that some memecoin is up 2000% while Ethereum is only up 20%, and inferring that the memecoin is obviously the more valuable investment, ignoring the fact that the memecoin still hasn't broken a dollar while Ethereum is trading at $2k a pop.
 
Back